What was the last movie you've seen?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
CFFJR
Next-Gen
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:51 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by CFFJR »

I don't think its weird either. I've gone to quite a few movies by myself. I also occasionally eat at restaurants by myself. I usually bring a book, which makes for excellent company.

The only thing I find weird is how self conscious people get about doing these activities alone, as though they're being judged. But if I'm wrong and loners are in fact being judged, that just seems even weirder. Oh well.

Anyway, Popo has it right. I'm sure as hell not going to miss out on something I want to do just because someone else isn't interested.

Besides, I know I'll have a good time because I'm such a fun guy. :lol:
GameSack wrote:That's right, only Sega had the skill to make a proper Nintendo game.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Luke »

CFFJR wrote:I'm sure as hell not going to miss out on something I want to do just because someone else isn't interested.
Insert a joke in bad taste about ejaculating here.

I saw CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS by myself in an empty theater. It ruled. I laughed as loudly as possible and even took off my shoes and kicked up my feet.

I've only eaten at a restaurant/gone to a bar by myself a few times because I was out of town on business. That doesn't feel weird either. Plus, for some reason if you are wearing a suit it doesn't seem odd to have a scotch at noon. And if you travel often, you see tons of people grabbing a drink alone.

You also see people drinking at 6am. The thing is, is that they may have just gotten off a ten hour flight and don't have a sense of time. That and some people want a drink before a flight.

In short: who cares? Do you. If you are worried about what joe blow thinks about you you will lead a miserable life. Watching a movie isn't meant to be a group activity. Live a little and see one by yourself.
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Exhuminator »

Luke wrote:If you are worried about what joe blow thinks about you you will lead a miserable life.
If you don't care what everyone thinks about you, why do you consistently use Racketboy as your personal life blog to garner opinions? Not that anyone minds you doing so, but your remark quoted above seems rather hypocritical in contrast to your forum behavior.

Anyway, I didn't mean seeing a movie by yourself equates to being a miserable lonely wretch. It's just I intrinsically equate going out to see a film as a social experience. I enjoy seeing my friends/family's reactions to the film, and then going out for dinner afterwards and discussing what we just saw. I -have- seen a movie or two by myself in the past, and I did not enjoy the experience nearly as much as I do with friends of family in tow.

On the flip side, I have zero problems sitting at home in my recliner watching movies on the big flat screen with a humongous bowl of popcorn in my lap all by myself. I actually prefer to do this when I'm watching a film that is "artsy" or more introspective than your typical dumbed down action flick or shallow dick'n'fart comedy. It allows me to become much more absorbed into movies I actually care about.

Speaking of which, I had exactly that experience from 11pm-1am last night with this:

Image

Bobby Deerfield (1977)

So in this film Al Pacino is a formula one race car driver. He witnesses two of his fellow racers get into a horrific racing accident that leaves one of them dead and the other paralyzed. This causes his character, Bobby Deerfield, to go into a state of existential shock. He refuses to accept the accident was a result of human error (it was) and keeps looking for mechanical or nature failure instead. He is deeply afraid of death coming to him in a way that he has no control over.

When he goes to visit his paralyzed compatriot at a specialist hospital in the beautiful mountainous countryside of Germany, he incidentally meets a unique woman also staying there. Her wild European outlook on life distinctly contrasts with his own more conservative less contemplative American one. Eventually they end up in a strange but rewarding relationship which causes Bobby to cheat on his girlfriend back home. He ends up leaving his racing career a bit stalled out as he spends as much time as possible with this new woman.

However, the woman has cancer. And Bobby does his best to ignore this fact and live a fantasy life traipsing all about Europe with her, living a fastly fading dream. Of course the inevitable eventually occurs, and she dies. Bobby however, does not emerge a broken man. Because he has learned from his time with this woman, that life is about living, not the fear of dying. And the way in which you spend your time, is more important than how much of it you are able to have in total. He looks back upon the accident that set his life on this crazy course, and realizes it was neither fate nor chance, it merely was.

To be honest I went into this film hoping to see Al Pacino as a crazy race car driver with high stakes adrenalin infused races in tow. What I got was nothing like that. This was a dark and introspective film, extremely slow paced and absolutely the anti-thesis to high stakes anything. Well, other than high stakes acceptance of our own moral essence.

But Bobby Deerfield did surprise me in one aspect. It showed me that Al Pacino was absolutely capable of auteur acting. And it made feel a tinge of sadness to know he left that behind once the world saw him as a the perfect mafia crime guy. A role in which he became permanently typecast after the indomitable Scarface. Maybe Mr. Pacino chose finance over freedom in those after years, but with Bobby Deerfield he had already proven he is as good an actor as anyone. Everything after this for him were simply victory laps.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
Gamerforlife
Next-Gen
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Florida

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Gamerforlife »

o.pwuaioc wrote:Just because a gimmick sells doesn't mean it's permanently here to stay:

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/j ... lan-parker

http://betanews.com/2014/04/07/why-3d-t ... -the-home/
There's a lot of BS in both of those articles. 3D glasses are NOT uncomfortable(and I wear glasses so I actually have to put the 3d ones over them and it doesn't bother me at all), and they've never made me dizzy or given me headaches. Are people really such pansies now and days? And the fact that the CASUAL audience is not taking to 3D doesn't mean jack to me, as none of my interests generally relate to casual, mainstream audiences anyway.

And I don't care what ONE director says about 3D, when there are other directors who use it to great effect.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
Forlorn Drifter
Next-Gen
Posts: 5166
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:02 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Forlorn Drifter »

Exhuminator wrote:
Luke wrote:If you are worried about what joe blow thinks about you you will lead a miserable life.
If you don't care what everyone thinks about you, why do you consistently use Racketboy as your personal life blog to garner opinions? Not that anyone minds you doing so, but your remark quoted above seems rather hypocritical in contrast to your forum behavior.

Anyway, I didn't mean seeing a movie by yourself equates to being a miserable lonely wretch. It's just I intrinsically equate going out to see a film as a social experience. I enjoy seeing my friends/family's reactions to the film, and then going out for dinner afterwards and discussing what we just saw. I -have- seen a movie or two by myself in the past, and I did not enjoy the experience nearly as much as I do with friends of family in tow.

On the flip side, I have zero problems sitting at home in my recliner watching movies on the big flat screen with a humongous bowl of popcorn in my lap all by myself. I actually prefer to do this when I'm watching a film that is "artsy" or more introspective than your typical dumbed down action flick or shallow dick'n'fart comedy. It allows me to become much more absorbed into movies I actually care about.
I only care about what the average person thinks because I don't know that many people who do think positively about me who actually know me, so I feel pressure to make myself seem normal to the other people around who don't know me. Its embarrassing enough how often I go to the movies with my parents considering my age, no need to make it worse.

And jp1 kind of leads me to a point- why risk embarrassment, perceived or otherwise, of going out alone, when I can wait for the movie to come out on video and watch it by myself?
ninjainspandex wrote:Maybe I'm just a pervert
PSN: Green-Whiskey
Owned Consoles: GameCube, N64, PS3, PS4, GBASP
User avatar
jp1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by jp1 »

Forlorn Drifter wrote:
Exhuminator wrote:
Luke wrote:If you are worried about what joe blow thinks about you you will lead a miserable life.
If you don't care what everyone thinks about you, why do you consistently use Racketboy as your personal life blog to garner opinions? Not that anyone minds you doing so, but your remark quoted above seems rather hypocritical in contrast to your forum behavior.

Anyway, I didn't mean seeing a movie by yourself equates to being a miserable lonely wretch. It's just I intrinsically equate going out to see a film as a social experience. I enjoy seeing my friends/family's reactions to the film, and then going out for dinner afterwards and discussing what we just saw. I -have- seen a movie or two by myself in the past, and I did not enjoy the experience nearly as much as I do with friends of family in tow.

On the flip side, I have zero problems sitting at home in my recliner watching movies on the big flat screen with a humongous bowl of popcorn in my lap all by myself. I actually prefer to do this when I'm watching a film that is "artsy" or more introspective than your typical dumbed down action flick or shallow dick'n'fart comedy. It allows me to become much more absorbed into movies I actually care about.
I only care about what the average person thinks because I don't know that many people who do think positively about me who actually know me, so I feel pressure to make myself seem normal to the other people around who don't know me. Its embarrassing enough how often I go to the movies with my parents considering my age, no need to make it worse.

And jp1 kind of leads me to a point- why risk embarrassment, perceived or otherwise, of going out alone, when I can wait for the movie to come out on video and watch it by myself?
How did I lead you to this? I think it is totally fine to go alone. I don't do it because of my personal preference, but I don't make judgments on those who do. Some people like to experience things differently, it doesn't say anything about you other than you felt like watching a movie.

But, if your preference is to watch it at home, why not? Whatever makes you happy.
User avatar
Fragems
Next-Gen
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:01 am
Location: Proctorville, OH

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Fragems »

Really any more I prefer to go alone.

Reasons:
1. I like to go at odd hours mainly to avoid crowds and to get in on matinee and/or early bird(first showing) prices.
2. I like "weird" stuff according to my family.
3. Seems like every time I go with a group I have to bug someone to put their phone up constantly :roll: . There have been times when I've gone with a group and multiple people are facebooking the whole movie which is not only distracting but can lead to some very awkward arguments amongst the audience on occasion.
4. I also find it relaxing not having to worry about the people in your group understanding or enjoying a movie. When you are by yourself you just go to what you want to see.
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Michi »

Luke wrote:I saw CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS by myself in an empty theater. It ruled. I laughed as loudly as possible and even took off my shoes and kicked up my feet.
I went to go see Insidious by myself and ended up being the only person in the theatre. It was probably one of the most enjoyable experiences I've had going to the movies. And as an added bonus, there was nobody around to judge me if I jumped and accidently spilled my popcorn.
User avatar
DeadPark
16-bit
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 11:44 am
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by DeadPark »

Just now i watched the original Hellraiser movie for the first time, and i'm a bit confused.

None of the Cenobites, Pinhead included, actually DID anything. they mentioned having done horrible things, and threatened going to do horrible things. but in the course of the movie, none of them did anything other than standing there looking scary.

Do they do more in the sequels that made Pinhead the horror icon he is? or is it just because of how unique he looks that everyone remembers him?
Visit me at http://www.DeadPark.com. The Many Deaths of a Gamer.
Or follow me on Facebook or Twitter
User avatar
CFFJR
Next-Gen
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:51 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by CFFJR »

Forlorn Drifter wrote: Its embarrassing enough how often I go to the movies with my parents considering my age, no need to make it worse.
Just as a side note, my favorite movie going companion is my dad.
GameSack wrote:That's right, only Sega had the skill to make a proper Nintendo game.
Post Reply