Don't forget that many of the best moments and strongest elements in the original film involving Gene Wilder were actually ad-libbed by him and not in the script. His Wonka is far darker and more troubled than perhaps even the script required.samsonlonghair wrote:I've heard the argument that the remake is closer to the original book, but here's the rub:MrPopo wrote:See, I always felt like the original diverged far too much from the book and didn't enjoy it. Charlie is closer to the book with some understandable modernizations. Now, the ending is definitely changed, but up until that point I enjoyed it better.KalessinDB wrote:We're doing back-to-back Chocolate Factories at work. Just finished the far superior Willy Wonka, now watching Charlie. I didn't detest the remake like most people did, but it really didn't hold a candle to the original.
The original book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was written by Ronald Dahl, and the screenplay for Willy Wonka was written by...Ronald Dahl. See where I'm going here? Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory diverges from the original book because the author made that choice. Ronald Dahl understood a simple truth: Books aren't movies, and movies aren't books.
What was the last movie you've seen?
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
-
Gamerforlife
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 10184
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
Yeah, I really dug that movie. It doesn't get talked about muchSpaceBooger wrote:Snowpiercer
This is a nice take on us humans and the post apocalyptic future minus zombies. The survivors are all living on a train divided up by social classes. The movie deals with that issue, the true meaning of most revolutions, and a somewhat open ending.
This movie can be a fun action flick or somewhat thought provoking depending on your mood when watching.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
It's funny how many people either "loved" the darkness of this movie or "hated" it, because it was actually just made as a spoof of how ridiculous it is that hollywood keeps making gritty reboots. It was supposed to be bad.samsonlonghair wrote:I just watched that Power Rangers "bootleg" short film that was making the rounds on the interwebs two or three weeks ago. I had high hopes going in.
I'm pretty disappointed. It's basically a generic action flick with brooding dudes, a morally ambiguous setting, and a female character who is a trope wrapped in a trope wrapped in another trope. Zach, the black ranger, is the only one we see doing any fighting in his ranger outfit. There's only a brief moment wherein we see zords fighting in the background.
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Equinox
A guy, his blind date, and a couple that he is friends with go on a picnic and decide to swing by an old professor's rustic cabin on the way. When they arrive, they find the cabin in ruins, a mysterious castle, a sheriff named Asmodeus, and a laughing man in a cave who gives them a locked book. Then they make the stupid decision to open the book. Hijinks and hellfire ensues...IN CLAYMATION!
Equinox is a low-budget horror film from 1970 that is amateurish in nearly every way: the dialog is bland, the acting wooden, and the cinematography leaves much to be desired. It follows a story-within-a-story approach, as a journalist listens to the ravings of the now insane guy as he recounts what happened to him. But there's a plucky underdog side to the film that is hard to deny, mainly because the plot is vaguely reminiscent of Evil Dead, just from an earlier era. If you're interested in what Evil Dead would have been like with considerably less gore and a reworked plot that is just that much hokier, well, here you go.
Also, the high point of the film is the special effects, which consists largely of some very impressive claymation. As in, it rivals some of the best work of Ray Harryhausen...which isn't that surprising considering the creator/director/producer/special effects man behind the film, Dennis Muren, went on to become a part of ILM and now has 9 academy awards for Best Visual Effects.
- prfsnl_gmr
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 12412
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
If I recall correctly, my wife and I watched this last October during horror movie month. I thought it was suprisibgly enjoyable, and the special effects were certainly a highlight (along with the park ranger's performanceAck wrote:Equinox
- samsonlonghair
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5188
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
- Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
If it was supposed to be bad, they succeeded. That's kind of a weak excuse don't you think? There are plenty of parodies that are still good movies.Jrecee wrote:It's funny how many people either "loved" the darkness of this movie or "hated" it, because it was actually just made as a spoof of how ridiculous it is that hollywood keeps making gritty reboots. It was supposed to be bad.samsonlonghair wrote:I just watched that Power Rangers "bootleg" short film that was making the rounds on the interwebs two or three weeks ago. I had high hopes going in.
I'm pretty disappointed. It's basically a generic action flick with brooding dudes, a morally ambiguous setting, and a female character who is a trope wrapped in a trope wrapped in another trope. Zach, the black ranger, is the only one we see doing any fighting in his ranger outfit. There's only a brief moment wherein we see zords fighting in the background.

On a more positive note, I'm excited for the coming summer blockbuster movie season. I'm especially excited for Age of Ultron and how it sets up Cap3 Civil War next year.

I'm definitely going to see Jurassic World. It doesn't even need to be a good movie. As far as I'm concerned, Steven Spielberg already has my money. I love dinosaurs, doesn't everyone?

Just the name "Brad Bird" is enough to get me interested in Tomorrowland. I loved the Incredibles.

Ant-man is a goofy name, but Marvel has been hitting it out of the park so consistently that I wouldn't doubt them for a moment. I hope this is as much fun as Guardians of the Galaxy.

Star Wars 7 is the only one leaving me apprehensive. Lucas himself has already done so much damage to his own franchise. We may as well see what Disney can bring to the table.
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
Haha, seeing that as a looped gif really drives home how unrealistic that looks. I'm fine with motorcycles looking unnaturally smooth in movies on roads, but moving any wheeled vehicle through the jungle would not a smooth proposition without violent bouncing and weaving all over the place. Especially not at speed. Espeeeeecciiiaaaallllly not while being chased by dinosaurs without looking around you like a crack monkey.samsonlonghair wrote: I'm definitely going to see Jurassic World. It doesn't even need to be a good movie. As far as I'm concerned, Steven Spielberg already has my money. I love dinosaurs, doesn't everyone?
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
-
AppleQueso
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
heh he was pushing for that in ROTJ toosamsonlonghair wrote:![]()
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
There is something juvenile, but funny about the phrase "Back to back chocolate factories".
Re: What was the last movie you've seen?
back and forth
forever
))<>((
forever
))<>((
