What was the last movie you've seen?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24192
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by MrPopo »

marurun wrote:
MrPopo wrote:Jupiter Ascending.

I have no idea what the hell I just watched.
Did it keep you entertained, if clueless?
The movie definitely brought the spectacle.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by samsonlonghair »

I watched it too. I want you guys to know that I really do love movies. I don't set out to immediately hate every movie I see. That said, here we go...
Image
Jupiter Ascending
Jupiter Ascending gives you the visual flair you expect from the Wachowskis. The space scenes are gorgeous with shots of Planet Jupiter's famous unending hurricane. The quasi-immortal great red spot of Planet Jupiter is a visual metaphor for the villainous house Abrasax who extend their own lives for millennia by consuming planets. The character Jupiter Jones is also gorgeous. I felt like I was in danger of falling right into the pools Mila Kunis's big brown eyes. This movie gives the audience an abundance of eye candy, but is there any steak and potatoes under all that sugar?

Let's talk about world building for a moment, or in this case world borrowing. In Jupiter Ascending we see noble families trying to take control of galactic resources as in the Dune franchse. Indeed the family Abrasax sounds an awful lot like Planet Arrakis, no? We see lizardmen from the D&D franchise. We see genetically spliced animal people from James Cameron's Dark Angel series. I get the impression that the Wachowskis wanted to build up an elaborate mythos to make their own franchise, but I don't see this movie turning into a trilogy anytime soon.

I'll give the filmmakers credit for tackling the issue of first world over-consumption, but they go about it in such an obtuse way. The bad guys live by killing everyone on a planet. That's it. There's No nuance, no depth, just evil people who extend their lives by consuming yours.

I'll end this review on a positive note by saying that Eddie Redmayne really surprised me as a great villainous actor. In a movie this stupidly blunt, Redmayne was the one actor who supplied some much-needed subtlety. I'll probably be exploring his imdb page later to see what other films he has acted in since The Other Boleyn Girl.

The Verdict: Watch this on DVD or Netflix. Skip the theatre.
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Pulsar_t »

2014 was a bloody good year for film.

Anyone seen Boyhood? It won at the Baftas.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
Posts: 12412
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by prfsnl_gmr »

My wife really, really enjoys Agent Carter. (Seriously, she loves that show.) And, since we have enjoyed the show so much, we decided to watch Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

Whereas, Captain America: The First Avenger contends with Iron Man 2 for the duboius distinction of worst MCU film, I think that Captain America: The Winter Soldier contends with Iron Man for the honor of best MCU film. It was consistently entertaining; the atmosphere and setting were excellent; and the action sequences were spectacular. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
User avatar
Sload Soap
Next-Gen
Posts: 2105
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:43 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Sload Soap »

Pulsar_t wrote:2014 was a bloody good year for film.

Anyone seen Boyhood? It won at the Baftas.
No, but I heard it took twelve years to make.
User avatar
nullPointer
128-bit
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by nullPointer »

prfsnl_gmr wrote:Whereas, Captain America: The First Avenger contends with Iron Man 2 for the duboius distinction of worst MCU film, I think that Captain America: The Winter Soldier contends with Iron Man for the honor of best MCU film. It was consistently entertaining; the atmosphere and setting were excellent; and the action sequences were spectacular. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
I first saw The Winter Soldier this summer during a flight from Minneapolis, MN to Orlando, FL. We were traveling with our twin girls (age 5) though, so it was a far cry from what one might call an optimal viewing experience.

So fast forward to the present; my wife and I watched The First Avenger and Winter Soldier back to back last night. I have to say your assessment is spot on. The First Avenger does a few things right, and had the potential to be awesome, but ultimately winds up as a missed opportunity. You know something has gone terribly wrong when the best scenes in the film are the ones featuring Steve Rogers prior to his becoming Captain America. The WWII setting is rife with opportunity for fantastic vignettes of the Cap knocking some Nazi heads together, but it's an opportunity that's almost completely overlooked. Hugo Weaving puts in a solidly diabolical performance as Red Skull, and it's alwasy fun to see Tommy Lee Jones ... being Tommy Lee Jones, but the few decent performances here are not enough to salvage the film. It just never really gels. The lack of effective action scenes and overwhelming moments of cheesiness prove to be detrimental. Furthermore despite some rather nice portrayals of WWII America and Europe, the design team widely missed the mark in terms of well presented retro-futuristic elements (essentially any of the Hydra weaponry). Given the amount quality dieselpunk design available for inspiration (I'm looking at you Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow), that part should have an easy gimme.

The Winter Soldier rights many of the wrongs committed in the first film. Among other things I think the sequel nails the classic anachronistic theme of Captain America being "a man out of time" when set against the backdrop of post 9/11 America. The action scenes are fantastic (Black Widow is a longtime favorite of mine), and it's a pretty impeccable example of how proper pacing in an action film should be done. Lastly the 'long game payoff' reveal harkening back to the first movie is well planed and neatly executed. If not for this last bit the first Captain America could (and possibly should) be skipped all together.
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22576
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Ack »

Image

Robin and the 7 Hoods

I don't care who is in it, or that it got nominated for an Academy Award(for best song), or that it is the last of the real Rat Pack trilogy of films. For me, this movie is a beautiful train wreck. Watch this movie if you want to see Sammy Davis, Jr., tap dance on a bar top while shooting two pistols, if you want to see Frank Sinatra singing about how much he loves Chicago while dressed like a leprechaun, if you want to see Bing Crosby dance with children, if you want to see Peter Falk have a musical number! I just can't take this movie seriously...

...which is probably the point. It's obvious that everyone involved was goofing off and having fun. There are gags galore, and the whole production is ridiculous. It's the story of Robin Hood, but it's like Guys and Dolls, but less serious, yet still keeping to a "bad guys lose" message while showing how evil women's groups are and making sure that not all the bad guys lose...just the hero bad guys. And there are lots of jokes about burying people in cement blocks. I just, I just....wow.

Image

Parasite

Hey, it's Demi Moore! This is her second film, and she was only 20 at the time. But she's not the hero of the film, she's a young woman with a passion for growing lemons and wearing baggy pants. Instead, our hero is Bob Glaudini, who plays Dr. Paul Dean. Instead of cooking up things in the kitchen, he cooks up exotic new parasites for the government, thinking somehow that this will be a good thing. It's not, and the good doctor gets himself infected by one of the parasites he created. So he takes another parasite to experiment on, kills the rest, and flees. But in this post-apocalyptic wasteland, where runaway inflation and a mega business guild known only as the Merchants has effectively taken over the government and instituted Soviet-style work camps, Paul has little hope. He's now being pursued by one of the Merchants' own, a one-gloved assassin named Wolf, and his parasite is slowly growing in size.

If you haven't figured it out yet, the name that is tingling in the back of your mind is "Alien." Yep, it's an alien knock off, with a Stan Winston-created blood sucking worm with a killer smile that loves to sink its teeth into things and explode out of old women's faces. Unfortunately it also takes its dear sweet time showing up on screen, so we have to watch a good 45 minutes of characters trying to develop and an "evil" group of wasteland teenagers try to appear threatening. And there's the crazy fake rape scene at the beginning too, in which I guess the tied up woman went insane and develop Stockholm syndrome real quick and helps her tormentors attack the guy who just rescued her. High art, this is not.

So what are the highlights? The parasite, when it finally shows up. Most everything else is filler, and while there are a couple of interesting characters in the post apocalyptic wasteland, most are either stereotypes(angry gas station guy, friendly old man, valiant but scarred African American supporting cast member) or they are woefully pathetic(teenage kids). Unfortunately, the big villain falls into that second category. Wolf is about as menacing as a Wall Street stockbroker armed with a laser pointer, and outside of the few times he gets the drop on someone, he's about as effective. I can pull better evil out of my ass, dude!

Above all, I found this film middle of the road. It's not so terrible as to become laughable, but there isn't enough to make this even approach the idea of a good movie. And there are awkward mistakes, like the closeups of a man being burned to death which show it's obviously a stunt guy in a fire suit that's about twice as big as the guy getting burned, or a kid getting his ear cut off and then having it much later.
Image
User avatar
J T
Next-Gen
Posts: 12417
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by J T »

Pulsar_t wrote:2014 was a bloody good year for film.

Anyone seen Boyhood? It won at the Baftas.
I did and I loved it.
My contributions to the Racketboy site:
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by samsonlonghair »

nullPointer wrote:
prfsnl_gmr wrote:Whereas, Captain America: The First Avenger contends with Iron Man 2 for the duboius distinction of worst MCU film, I think that Captain America: The Winter Soldier contends with Iron Man for the honor of best MCU film. It was consistently entertaining; the atmosphere and setting were excellent; and the action sequences were spectacular. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
I first saw The Winter Soldier this summer during a flight from Minneapolis, MN to Orlando, FL. We were traveling with our twin girls (age 5) though, so it was a far cry from what one might call an optimal viewing experience.

So fast forward to the present; my wife and I watched The First Avenger and Winter Soldier back to back last night. I have to say your assessment is spot on. The First Avenger does a few things right, and had the potential to be awesome, but ultimately winds up as a missed opportunity. You know something has gone terribly wrong when the best scenes in the film are the ones featuring Steve Rogers prior to his becoming Captain America. The WWII setting is rife with opportunity for fantastic vignettes of the Cap knocking some Nazi heads together, but it's an opportunity that's almost completely overlooked. Hugo Weaving puts in a solidly diabolical performance as Red Skull, and it's alwasy fun to see Tommy Lee Jones ... being Tommy Lee Jones, but the few decent performances here are not enough to salvage the film. It just never really gels. The lack of effective action scenes and overwhelming moments of cheesiness prove to be detrimental. Furthermore despite some rather nice portrayals of WWII America and Europe, the design team widely missed the mark in terms of well presented retro-futuristic elements (essentially any of the Hydra weaponry). Given the amount quality dieselpunk design available for inspiration (I'm looking at you Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow), that part should have an easy gimme.

The Winter Soldier rights many of the wrongs committed in the first film. Among other things I think the sequel nails the classic anachronistic theme of Captain America being "a man out of time" when set against the backdrop of post 9/11 America. The action scenes are fantastic (Black Widow is a longtime favorite of mine), and it's a pretty impeccable example of how proper pacing in an action film should be done. Lastly the 'long game payoff' reveal harkening back to the first movie is well planed and neatly executed. If not for this last bit the first Captain America could (and possibly should) be skipped all together.
These are cases where my expectations influence my assessments of a movies.

I expected Captain America: The First Avenger to stink up the theatre. I was impressed that this movie made steve rogers likeable, told a good story, had charismatic villain, and helped unify the franchise. I didn't expect a good movie, so I was pleasantly surprised.

I liked Captain America: Winter soldier even more. I shouldn't, but I do. I don't generally enjoy spy movies, which is basically what this movie is. The hero uncovers a conspiracy, finds corruption at home (imagine that), goes rogue, blows stuff up, unmasks a double-agent and saves the western world. This is basically the plot to every James Bond, Mission Impossible, and Jason Bourne movie ever made. Despite falling into this old formula, I enjoyed Winter Soldier more than I expected to. Chris Evans and Scarlett Johansson are more likeable than Pierce Brosnan and Roger Moore teaming up with George Lazenby and Timothy Dalton to punch Daniel Craig in the nose. Also, I found CA: Winter Soldier very timely in regards to the NSA, wikileaks, and the Eric Snowden scandal.
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by samsonlonghair »

I was going to post this next bit in the "smile/ticked off" thread, but based on its content, thought it was more relevant to the movie thread.
KalessinDB wrote::D Mel Brooks talking Spaceballs 2 for semi-serious

:( Wouldn't do it unless he could get Rick Moranis on board.
Luke wrote:
MrPopo wrote:Spider-Man... Spider-Man... does whatever an Iron Man can...
I really do think that Sony and Disney got together and someone from Sony said "If you can help us not screw up another Spider-Man movie and help make a good one...You can use him too".

This is going to make Civil War oh so much better and intriguing. Meanwhile DC Films must be thinking "Oh shit".

As far as Spaceballs 2 goes, it's not happening unless Joan Rivers is in it too so take that into consideration. Fairly certain all this talk is just Mel reminding Rick that he deeply cares for him.
Regarding Spaceballs sequel talk:
Mel Brooks said the same basic thing ten years ago when Revenge of the Sith was coming out. It's just Hollywood talk. Mel Brooks hasn't directed a movie in twenty years, and when he was directing he didn't make sequels. On the other hand, he did produce a spaceballs animated series in 2008. That's probably the closest thing we're ever going to see to a sequel.


Regarding the Spider-man Sony Pictures / Marvel Studios deal:
I'm glad this deal finally gained traction. I was afraid that talks had stalled out.
The information in this press release tells everything we really know for sure.
Sony Pictures Entertainment Brings Marvel Studios Into The Amazing World Of Spider-Man

New Spider-Man Will Appear First in an Upcoming Marvel Film Within Marvel’s Cinematic Universe

Published
Feb 9, 2015

Marvel's Kevin Feige to Produce Next Installment of the Spider-Man Franchise with Amy Pascal

(Culver City, California, and Burbank, California February 09, 2015) – Sony Pictures Entertainment and Marvel Studios announced today that Sony is bringing Marvel into the amazing world of Spider-Man.

Under the deal, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film from Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU). Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017, in a film that will be co-produced by Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel and Amy Pascal, who oversaw the franchise launch for the studio 13 years ago. Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger. Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films.

Marvel and Sony Pictures are also exploring opportunities to integrate characters from the MCU into future Spider-Man films.

The new relationship follows a decade of speculation among fans about whether Spider-Man – who has always been an integral and important part of the larger Marvel Universe in the comic books – could become part of the Marvel Universe on the big screen. Spider-Man has more than 50 years of history in Marvel's world, and with this deal, fans will be able to experience Spider-Man taking his rightful place among other Super Heroes in the MCU.

Bob Iger, Chairman and CEO, The Walt Disney Company said: "Spider-Man is one of Marvel's great characters, beloved around the world. We're thrilled to work with Sony Pictures to bring the iconic web-slinger into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which opens up fantastic new opportunities for storytelling and franchise building."

"We always want to collaborate with the best and most successful filmmakers to grow our franchises and develop our characters. Marvel, Kevin Feige and Amy, who helped orchestrate this deal, are the perfect team to help produce the next chapter of Spider-Man," said Michael Lynton, Chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment. "This is the right decision for the franchise, for our business, for Marvel, and for the fans."

"Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios share a love for the characters in the Spider-Man universe and have a long, successful history of working together. This new level of collaboration is the perfect way to take Peter Parker's story into the future," added Doug Belgrad, president, Sony Pictures Entertainment Motion Picture Group.

"I am thrilled to team with my friends at Sony Pictures along with Amy Pascal to produce the next Spider-Man movie," said Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige. "Amy has been deeply involved in the realization on film of one of the world’s most beloved characters. Marvel's involvement will hopefully deliver the creative continuity and authenticity that fans demand from the MCU. I am equally excited for the opportunity to have Spider-Man appear in the MCU, something which both we at Marvel, and fans alike, have been looking forward to for years."

Spider-Man, embraced all over the world, is the most successful franchise in the history of Sony Pictures, with the five films having taken in more than $4 billion worldwide.

ABOUT SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT

Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) is a subsidiary of Sony Entertainment Inc., a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Sony Corporation. SPE's global operations encompass motion picture production, acquisition and distribution; television production, acquisition and distribution; television networks; digital content creation and distribution; operation of studio facilities; and development of new entertainment products, services and technologies. For additional information, go to http://www.sonypictures.com/.

ABOUT MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT

Marvel Entertainment, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company, is one of the world's most prominent character-based entertainment companies, built on a proven library of more than 8,000 characters featured in a variety of media over seventy-five years. Marvel utilizes its character franchises in entertainment, licensing and publishing. For more information visit marvel.com. © 2015 MARVEL

More on Marvel.com: http://marvel.com/news/movies/24062/son ... z3RMb1U9UB
I think we can reasonable assume that Spider-man will appear in Captain America: Civil War, which is a relief. The story of Marvel's Civil War crossover just wouldn't be complete without Spidey. I don't think that the Russo Brothers are going to start this off with the Nitro / Speedball Stamford tragedy. Rather, I think that the Age of Ultron incident will be the turning point that leads to the superhuman registration act.

In any case, the next few years are going to be one hell of a ride for Superhero movies.
Post Reply