The Settlers Series

Windows, Mac, DOS, and all those-other personal computing platforms
Post Reply
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

The Settlers Series

Post by ZeroAX »

gog has a sale on the Settler series (and I think more Ubisoft published games, I'm not sure) so I decided to give in and buy for 3.5€ one of my most played demos as a kid, which I never got to play the full version of, The Settlers 3

Image

Image

Image

I love this game and in all its micro-manage glory. You control a group of.....non-pacifist smurfs I guess :lol: (modeled after the Romans, Egyptians or Chinese) and build your city who's economy is SUPER dependent on everything running smoothly (the wood cutter cuts wood, which gets turned into planks by a specialist, which get delivered to a building site, to build a mine to extract ore, to use at the smith along with the ore from a different mine to make iron bars, which are given to the weapons smith to make weapons, only he also needs coal from the coal mine, but the coal miners are on strike cause you didn't provide them with food, cause you forgot to build a stone cutter who would provide the stone to build the water mill which would gather water from the river for your pig and wheat farm, so now you have no source of food, no source of ore for your weapons smith, so no weapons for the new recruits to fight off the invading army that just appeared.....(breath breath breath breath).......)

So yeah if you like cute cartoony graphics and a micro-managed economy this game is for you. It's like something between the more typical city builder (think Pharaoh) and Age of Empires.

I think number 2 is considered the best in the series, but I like 3 a bit more (though I only played the 10th anniversary edition of 2). Then there are the more modern settler games that have less cartoony graphics and thus are less fun (not to mention the settlers 7 has retarded always on DRM from ubisoft :twisted: ).


Any other fans of the series? :)
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Ivo
Next-Gen
Posts: 3627
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Portugal

Re: The Settlers Series

Post by Ivo »

I played 1 and 2. I know I never completed the campaign on the first (some really harsh levels there), but it was good fun. And I think I may have finished the second, which was quite good and had pretty good graphics for the time, at least IMO.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: The Settlers Series

Post by ZeroAX »

Ivo wrote:I played 1 and 2. I know I never completed the campaign on the first (some really harsh levels there), but it was good fun. And I think I may have finished the second, which was quite good and had pretty good graphics for the time, at least IMO.
What made you give up on the series? 3 is really good too, and if you are feeling nostalgic about number 2 you can always play the 10th anniversary edition. 4 was ok I guess but....it felt kind of bland....I don't know why
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Ivo
Next-Gen
Posts: 3627
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Portugal

Re: The Settlers Series

Post by Ivo »

ZeroAX wrote:
Ivo wrote:I played 1 and 2. I know I never completed the campaign on the first (some really harsh levels there), but it was good fun. And I think I may have finished the second, which was quite good and had pretty good graphics for the time, at least IMO.
What made you give up on the series? 3 is really good too, and if you are feeling nostalgic about number 2 you can always play the 10th anniversary edition. 4 was ok I guess but....it felt kind of bland....I don't know why
By the time 3 rolled around I played the demo and it felt a lot "more of the same" I think. Another issue that was always present is that the game moves at a snail pace, which is sort of part of the charm (I believe one can speed up time, at least in later versions, but then the game loses part of the fun which is watching stuff being built and done). I guess I just opted to play other games.

I had something similar happen to me and Civilization. I only played the first, and the off-shoots (Alpha Centauri is possibly the best, although I have a fond spot for Master of Magic, and while Colonisation is good I didn't like it as much), I want to play Civ 2 and the others one day but they are huge time sinks for me. It is a strange position as far as Civ is concerned because I almost know for sure I will like the sequels.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: The Settlers Series

Post by ZeroAX »

Oh...well I can see the more of the same angle, but since it was my first settlers it wasn't an issue for me.

And yes the fun is seeing stuff being built up. I played the first mission for the romans and I was preparing an economy to fight off the other army, but it turns out I should just have picked up all the units the game gave me at the start and send them to conquer him :lol: (for some reason I had like 20-30 soldiers at the start which is a lot I think. probably cause it's the easy campaign)

and you should really check out civ V ;)
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Post Reply