Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Michi »

Thanks, guys. Ginger Snaps is great. If you like werewolf movies at all it's a no brainer.




On to the next movie-


The Relic

Image

Hadn’t seen this one before, so Yay! for new things.

The Relic starts with a scene showing a scene of a tribe in South America performing some sort of ritual while some white guy takes pictures (He is presumably a scientist or a photographer for National Geographic).

They give him some sort of concoction they’ve made (*sigh* armature) that makes him have some sort of hallucinogenic fit. One scene later and he’s freaking out on a cargo ship, trying to find something in a crate that’s set to arrive at a museum in Chicago.

Six week later some crates arrive at said museum, one containing an ancient stone relic, while the other is filled with nothing but leaves covered in some sort of fungus nobody seems familiar with.

Image
They look like those little beads people like to make necklaces out of.

Meanwhile, a ship has been found adrift in Lake Michigan. The outside walls are covered in blood and detective D’Agosta and his partner quickly find the missing crew below deck, killed and decapitated, by unknown assailants.

Image
Sometimes you just know when it’s going to be one of those days.

Back at the museum, Dr. Margo Green is working late, having taken some of the leaves for analysis. She hears strange noises as she leaves that night, but makes it home without incident. The security guard, however, is not so fortunate.

Image
I used to be scared of this very thing when I was younger.

With the gruesome death discovered the next morning, detective D’Agosta is called in to investigate the crime, which he suspects is linked to the same culprit who attacked the ship. He closes the museum down, much to the consternation of the management staff, who seem more concerned with their upcoming gala than the death of their security guard.

It falls to D’Agosta and Dr. Green to find out what’s going on and try to prevent more people from suffering a similar fate.

Image
And it’s a really bad fate, I assure you.

At its heart, The Relic is a creature feature, and a very safe one at that. It follows the old time monster formula to a T.

Practical flashes of the monster are shown in the first two-thirds of the film, with the big reveal saved for the final act. The people you don’t like will probably die, and the ones you do like will be safe from any major harm. It even follows one of the rules from ‘Safe Monster Movie 101’: let the annoying, bratty children live, but kill off the token black guy while he tokes up in the men’s room.

Image
If he’d watched Scream the year before, he could have avoided this fate.

The characters are all rather safe too, with everyone filling their roles nicely. No one here seems out of place, but the above par script and the actors chosen (including Penelope Ann Miller, Tom Sizemore, James Whitmore, and Linda Hunt) does add some humor and color to the formula, boosting the quality and enjoyment up an extra level. Sizemore’s D’Agosta is a solid and matter of fact detective (albeit, one with a superstitious streak) and Miller’s Green is intelligent and proactive, which is a refreshing change from the genre norm. Damsels in distress do not create their own version of the Molotov cocktails afterall.

The monster effects here fare better than those in Ginger Snaps, thanks to the work of Stan Wilson (of Jurassic Park and Predator fame.) It’s almost like an amalgamation of everything he’d worked on before. It takes a good while to get there, but the monster is actually pretty badass once you get a good look at it.

Unfortunately, that’s assuming you can get a good look at it, because this movie is dark. And I don’t mean it that focuses too much on death, or the hopelessness of humanity, or some crap like that. I mean it is DARK. As in, what the f*&# is going on, I can’t see a damn thing.

Director Peter Hyams apparently has a real thing for shadows and only using a single light source, because what could have been used sparingly or to create ambiance

Image
Note: This has actually been lightened. It was originally much darker.

instead can just make your head hurt as you squint trying to figure out what you’re looking at.

Image
Turn on a damn light!

It’s really quite a shame, though it does have the added benefit of obscuring the films other graphical flaw: Late 90’s CGI.

For the most part, the monster is a solid, animatronic puppet, but any time any fast movement is involved they switched to CGI. While reviewer Gene Siskel might have praised the special effects in 1997, today they’re dated and obvious and not in a good way.

Image
This is the closest to a ‘full creature spoil’ as you’re going to get from me.

The Relic is really one big stalking monster scene after another, aided heavily by the chemistry between the characters. While it’s cliché, it does all the clichés well and throws in a decent script and a strong female lead for good measure. All the scientific talk means it’s not a movie that you can completely turn your brain off too, but it’s pretty close and actually pretty fun. At 105 minutes it’s probably too long, but the monster is pretty slick, so anyone who’s a fan of creature-features can probably risk giving this one a go.
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by TSTR »

I swear The Relic must hold the world record for "Most Uses of the Word Hypothalamus in a Movie."
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by dsheinem »

I introduced some friends to both White Zombie (1932) and The Killer Shrews (1959) tonight. Good times, fun films.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

Killer Shrews is hilarious.
Image
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Ack »

Well, I was a busy boy on Friday.

Image

Werewolves on Wheels

Take a 1970s biker film, mix in some poorly handled New Age mumbo jumbo, some hardcore Satanism, and a pinch of gore, then for bonus effect use the same werewolf effects we've been seeing since the 1940s, and you've got Werewolves on Wheels, a film that is just as aimless and meandering as the bikers it focuses on. None of these are nice guys, willing to engage in random acts of violence, harassment, drug and alcohol abuse, and sexuality. So when they get targeted by a satanic cult, you don't really feel bad for them. But slowly the group begins to fall apart as members end up getting killed by a beast in the night, all while the motley crew's leader's girlfriend has strange visions of being the Bride of Satan.

The title's a bit of a misnomer: there are two werewolves, but only one that we get to see ride a motorcycle. It's not a good film. But it is an interesting look at '70s slang: "Someone's controlling the vibes, man." Someone indeed.

Image

Opera

Sometimes our parents are messed up people, but that doesn't automatically mean we are. Opera follows an opera singer named Betty who has just been given the lead role in Verdi's Macbeth and then gets harassed by a crazed stalker who gets off on forcing others into voyeurism of his murders. This film is very Dario Argento: use of first person for the killer's viewpoint, heavy metal whenever he murders, extended scenes where you think someone is going to get cut based on the emphasis of sharp and stabbing objects, graphic violence of people getting stabbed in terrible places, a bizarre and murderous love of animals in his movies, eye trauma(why do Europeans love eye trauma?!), and an ending that will probably make you groan. It's not a killer midget, but that whole final scene really lowered my opinion of the film.

Anyway, if you like Argento's style, particularly his 1970s/1980s output, then you'll probably enjoy Opera(I do, and I did for the most part. Just...that ending...ugh). if you don't like Argento's style, then you may still enjoy aspects of this movie but loathe it because it's definitely one of his movies. And it does bring the tension, wonderfully so at times.

Image

Satánico pandemonium

Who doesn't love a good nunsploitation film? God knows I do. Satánico pandemonium centers on poor Sister Maria, who has been targeted by Satan to destroy her convent and lead her fellow nuns to Hell, through a combination of murder and sexuality. There's racism too, but funny enough, that wasn't caused by Satan, so these nuns aren't exactly good at what they do. But Sister Maria is the most pure, and that's why Satan goes for her! She tries to stop him, through acts of kindness, flagellation, and prayer, but it doesn't work, and soon she's trying to get with one of her Sisters, seducing an underage boy, and killing random folks. And then it all comes to a head, with a twist ending that would probably rustle M. Night Shyamalan's jimmies. Just remember, not eating the apple won't save you, as apparently seeing a naked Mexican Satan is all it takes to turn you evil.

But did I enjoy it? Well...it was ok. Nothing about it particularly stood out, outside of Enrique Rocha's performance as Lucifer. His calm and smarmy demeanor was great. Here is a Lucifer who knows he has already won.

Image

City of the Living Dead

This is my vote for the weakest of Lucio Fulci's Gates of Hell trilogy. It has some great gore effects, as does just about everything Fulci does, but certain effects are used way too often to keep them interesting(ie. brain squeezing), and the plot doesn't make much sense and jumps around. There are also a few things that never get explained, such as why zombies can teleport and die from getting stabbed in the stomach, but Fulci does successfully create a creepy atmosphere in the city of Dunwich. Also, maggot winds and bleeding walls are gross, as are mentally and physically handicapped sex fiends with blowup dolls in abandoned houses. And never live in a town with a name from a Lovecraft story. Just don't do it. Avoid New England. It will kill us all.
5/31

La chute de la maison Usher
Werewolves on Wheels
Opera
Satánico pandemonium
The City of the Living Dead
Image
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

Ack, as I've said many times - and I think is against popular opinion - Argento just isn't a good director. And he's a downright terrible writer. He's a wonderful cinematographer though. His use of colors, superb. His long, sweeping, single-cut shots, incredible. He's a visual artist. But for the most part, I think he's largely over hyped. Opera is one of my favorites, but it's still got its issues yeah. I don't know, I've sat thru the majority of his (English language) output, and I find that the good (Opera, Suspiria) is far out-weighed by the awful (Do You Like Hitchcock?, The Cart Player, Phantom of the f'ing Opera, and many, many others).
Image
User avatar
jp1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by jp1 »

noiseredux wrote:Ack, as I've said many times - and I think is against popular opinion - Argento just isn't a good director. And he's a downright terrible writer. He's a wonderful cinematographer though. His use of colors, superb. His long, sweeping, single-cut shots, incredible. He's a visual artist. But for the most part, I think he's largely over hyped. Opera is one of my favorites, but it's still got its issues yeah. I don't know, I've sat thru the majority of his (English language) output, and I find that the good (Opera, Suspiria) is far out-weighed by the awful (Do You Like Hitchcock?, The Cart Player, Phantom of the f'ing Opera, and many, many others).
This is so hard for me to admit due to my love for Suspiria, but I have to agree. I always leave disappointed when I go into more of Argento's work. I was still thinking of giving Phenomena a chance though.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

jp1 wrote:This is so hard for me to admit due to my love for Suspiria, but I have to agree. I always leave disappointed when I go into more of Argento's work. I was still thinking of giving Phenomena a chance though.
haha, it's time we all just admit it. You see everyone talk about what a master he was, but man, let's just be straight. Disappointment by the time the end-credits hit is a repeated theme. Phenomena has one of the silliest scenes I've ever witnessed. But it's not terrible. It also inspired Clock Tower: First Fear, so there's that.
Image
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by TSTR »

Argento is not the greatest filmmaker in the world. His directing and writing are supbar, but the style he exhibits in cinematography, lighting, and set design is one-of-a-kind awesome. He's also got more good flicks than you'd think. Suspiria, Tenebre, Opera, Inferno, Deep Red, Phenomena, to name a few. I haven't seen his earlier giallo output, so I can't comment.

@Ack: Dude, how can you take House by the Cemetery over City of the Living Dead?
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Ack »

TSTR wrote:@Ack: Dude, how can you take House by the Cemetery over City of the Living Dead?
Repetition. Fulci's most famous for his gore effects, but here he used the same brain squeeze effect three times and crying blood twice, and the second time wasn't done very well. By the time I got to the third brain squeezing, I actually started shouting at my TV for him to do something different. Sure, the ending with the dead rising from their graves is where Fulci's supposed to be showing off his skills, but it's cheapened by him reusing effects. And then there are the teleporting zombies, which look all wormy...except for two who aren't? Why?

And yeah, Argento's scripts are terrible(at least, what we get are. He might be phenomenal in Italian, and we're just losing major plot elements in the translation), but he gets some great, physically expressive performances from his actors, his cinematography is awesome, his use of color, his willingness to experiment with perspective, and his wonderful effects counteract the balance. What I have seen of his films, I've enjoyed, even when I think the endings are often awful.

Image

The Town That Dreaded Sundown

This indie horror film from 1976 is filmed in a pseudo-documentary style. It gets a lot of facts half right and takes a lot of artistic license, but it's mostly well handled for a low budget affair. The Phantom Killer is a perfect pre-Halloween slasher villain, hulking and indomitable, with a nasty sadist streak that reaffirms that he is enjoying what he is doing. He uses a gun several times(including in one of my favorite scenes in the film, where he goes after Mary Anne from Gilligan's Island. That scene alone is worth watching the film for), but only when necessary or when trying to rapidly injure or finish off someone. Other times, he bludgeons and stabs people to death, hunts a woman with a pickaxe, and has a tendency to chew on the ladies.

Most of the film follows the various law enforcement trying to pursue him, eventually led by a tough Texas Ranger. The law enforcement officers who end up involved are all doing their best, but at times the movie ventures a bit far into the procedural, and the attempts at humor are really out of place. More than once things turned into a bad Dukes of Hazzard knock off, and the most offensive character is 'Sparkplug,' who is actually played by the director, Charles B. Pierce! (That's how he got onto the force, Michi!)

But when Pierce is off screen, the film is much more effective, such as his use of low-angle shots focusing on people's legs to emphasize that the Phantom Killer could be anyone, with a repetition of a pair of shoes to emphasize when the killer is potentially present on screen.

It's a shame Pierce was inconsistent with his direction and included those moments of levity, but I guess he felt he needed something to pad out the film. It's an effective low budget thriller otherwise. So long as you don't let the attempts at slapstick bother you, The Town That Dreaded Sundown isn't bad.
6/31

La chute de la maison Usher
Werewolves on Wheels
Opera
Satánico pandemonium
The City of the Living Dead
The Town That Dreaded Sundown
Image
Post Reply