Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
Post Reply
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
Posts: 12410
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by prfsnl_gmr »

noiseredux wrote:Prowler is a good portfolio piece for Savini and a pretty mediocre movie. But worth seeing once. Yeah.
By slasher film standards, I thought it was pretty good. It doesn't touch Halloween, but it is way, way better than Prom Night. (I would put it on par with Friday the 13th.)
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

it is way better than Prom Night, yes. But on par w/ Friday the 13th is crazy talk. I'd put F13 in the same league as Halloween, without question.

I'd put it more in the tier of say Happy Birthday To Me, My Bloody Valentine, April Fool's Day. Good slashers, but I still have others that I'd go to more often (The Burning, Sleepaway Camp(s), etc...)
Image
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
Posts: 12410
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by prfsnl_gmr »

noiseredux wrote:I'd put F13 in the same league as Halloween, without question.
Now that is crazy talk! :lol:
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

agree to disagree. I'd call slashers my favorite sub-genre, and F13 my favorite series within. I mean, movie vs. movie, I'd consider Halloween the superior movie itself, but I'd still rate the original Friday a 5/5.
Image
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Luke »

As far as "movies" go, I'd say HALLOWEEN blows F13 out of the water.

As far as achieving what the movie wants to portray they both did an excellent job.

I don't think a "John Carpenter's Friday the 13th" would work. I would definitely watch it, but I doubt it would have the same brutality to it. Could be wrong, but isn't HALLOWEEN more of a thriller, and F13 more of a slasher?
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by noiseredux »

Luke wrote:As far as "movies" go, I'd say HALLOWEEN blows F13 out of the water.

As far as achieving what the movie wants to portray they both did an excellent job.
exactly, I guess I'm saying this. I can't compare one to the other fairly. But I can say I consider both of them to be "5 star," perfect slashers.
Image
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Ack »

First one down. 30 to go.

La chute de la maison Usher (1928)

La chute de la maison Usher is a French silent film adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe's short story The Fall of the House of Usher. It's been years since I read the story, and of the film adaptations, the one I'm most familiar with is the Roger Corman production House of Usher, starring Vincent Price. But I wanted to see this one, first as a lover of Poe's work and horror, and second as a lover of silent film.

Directed by Jean Epstein(with Luis Buñuel contributing at about the start of his film career), La chute is not a strictly adherent version of the story and takes some great liberties, some of which I enjoyed, some of which I didn't. But the focus here is more on atmosphere, with some exceptionally beautiful shots of curtains and lace in the wind. In fact there are several highlights to this film: wind, cinematography, and the expressions of Jean Debucourt, who plays Roderick Usher. The intensity of his expressions alone is worth watching the film for: his mad stares of obsession in his painting, his sorrow and loss at the "death" of his sister, his open confession that he knew he buried her alive, all are done beautifully with a face that always stands out from the background. More impressive still are many of the shots and multiple exposures. The funeral procession is handled with nightmarish intensity, as the pallbearers march bearing the weight of their burdens wreathed in candles, juxtaposed with images of barren trees. And the mental sickness of Roderick, emphasized at times with ghostly superimposed images and double-vision, really helps emphasize what was effectively hyperesthesia in the short story.

There's a lot to love in this movie, and where it takes certain liberties I can see obvious influence from other tales. The introduction of Charles Lamy as the half-deaf guest(and pseudo-proxy for the audience) at a small tavern that refuses to help him when he says the name "Usher" distinctly recalls the beginning of Nosferatu, while Roderick's obsessive painting of his sister, Madeline, as she visibly weakens into collapse feels like a reverse version of The Picture of Dorian Gray. 19th-century horror seems well loved and appreciated in this film.

Unfortunately I don't think it's always successful, particularly with the ending, after what is a very effective return of Madeline Usher. Neither of the Ushers die in the film, completely unlike the story, and instead the portrait burns and the house crumbles. I'm bothered by this, as there were a few obsessive and incestuous overtones in their relationship(Roderick's obsession with her portrait, repeated visuals of frogs mating as Madeline's coffin is nailed shut), and having them survive a tale in which I know they die just feels like rewarding them and weakens the overall impact of the story. They're supposed to be sickly and possibly diseased, rot and inevitability are kind of the point. By letting them live, it cheats that inevitability.

Instead, to end on a high note, I want to talk about what was to me the most effective horror shot in the film. As the guest reads The Mad Tryst to Roderick, Madeline rises from her grave. The particular shot in question lasts no more than five seconds, mostly of lace flowing in the wind, until you realize it is the door to her tomb and Madeline is pushing it open for her escape. It lasts just long enough to see the side of her figure and then cuts away. It's a haunting moment in a haunting sequence of film made brilliant by Epstein's use of wind.

The film is in its entirety on YouTube at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Liu38jOpNiA

And before you ask, yes, I watched it at work. On my lunch break. It's only an hour long.
1/31

La chute de la maison Usher
Image
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by TSTR »

Ack wrote:And before you ask, yes, I watched it at work.
YEAH STICK IT TO THE MAN 8)
Ack wrote:On my lunch break.
:|
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by Ack »

TSTR wrote:
Ack wrote:And before you ask, yes, I watched it at work.
YEAH STICK IT TO THE MAN 8)
Ack wrote:On my lunch break.
:|
Liability purposes, you understand.
Image
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: Month of Horror V: the Seed of dsheinem & noiseredux

Post by TSTR »

Ack wrote:
TSTR wrote:
Ack wrote:And before you ask, yes, I watched it at work.
YEAH STICK IT TO THE MAN 8)
Ack wrote:On my lunch break.
:|
Liability purposes, you understand.
I'm sure Ted wouldn't mind. :mrgreen:
Post Reply