I think this is more of a case of preferring an art style than graphics.BoneSnapDeez wrote:"Better graphics" is such a relative term anyway. I'd argue that Ys Book I & II on Turbo CD looks superior to anything I've seen on XBox One because I personally prefer colorful hand-drawn / anime / pixel art graphics to "realistic" stuff. It's all about aesthetic preferences. Likewise, I think the Wii U has the "best looking" games so far this gen.
Wait are you saying that what is considered good graphics is subjective based on a person's preference? BLASPHEMY! GET OFF THIS INTERNET THIS INSTANT!BoneSnapDeez wrote:"Better graphics" is such a relative term anyway. I'd argue that Ys Book I & II on Turbo CD looks superior to anything I've seen on XBox One because I personally prefer colorful hand-drawn / anime / pixel art graphics to "realistic" stuff. It's all about aesthetic preferences. Likewise, I think the Wii U has the "best looking" games so far this gen.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
But when we are talking games that are ports of one another you can do a direct 1:1 comparison. Nothing about the same game with lower res models, muddy textures, things removed to conserve memory, etc than another port can ever be considered "better".BoneSnapDeez wrote:"Better graphics" is such a relative term anyway. I'd argue that Ys Book I & II on Turbo CD looks superior to anything I've seen on XBox One because I personally prefer colorful hand-drawn / anime / pixel art graphics to "realistic" stuff. It's all about aesthetic preferences. Likewise, I think the Wii U has the "best looking" games so far this gen.
I was almost fooled before, despite your reputation... But now I know you're just trolling.mjmjr25 wrote: @emwearz - re: those pics, I'm missing it, are the screen shots from different consoles - I guess I don't understand what i'm commenting on. Both shots look very nice.
If the PS3/Blu-ray player is hooked up via component, then it's being hobbled at least a little bit. At the very least, it's limited to 1080i rather than 1080p, and depending on the disc it may have the Image Constraint Token part of AACS active, and if so, will be downsampled to 960x540.dsheinem wrote: I think you must have your TV(s) configured to output standard def only or some such. There's no "marketing trickery" going on with visual fidelity between DVD and Blu-Ray, the difference is measurable and significant (in bitrate, resolution, etc.)
