REPO Man wrote:
This isn't about work ethic. My issue stems with the fact that he's assigning tasks based on no real logic or understanding of the correlation between one's skill set and the best tasks for said skill set.
I mean, I'm awesome with computers, kick ass at laundry, I know my way around a kitchen (and then some) and thanks to previous employment experiences I'm awesome at dishwashing and the custodial arts. My skills would be better suited towards doing the laundry, washing the dishes, sweeping the floors, vacuuming the carpets, scrubbing toilets, cleaning the sink and tub, cooking meals, fixing computer hiccups, optimizing home theater setups, and so on.
I'm not saying one's skill set determines such things but it's a good place to start when you want QUALITY end results. If my brother chopped wood, it'd take a fraction of the time. If he mowed the lawn it wouldn't take him four or five times to get every spot since he's more used to being able to maneuver the lawnmower.
Sorry dude, but that's a load of crap. What is gonna happen if you get married and you are the man of the house? Are you gonna make your significant other carry in groceries because your skill set is more set towards washing dishes. And how much of a quality result was he expecting? It was going from point a to point b, not disarming a bomb. And as far as mowing the lawn goes, its idiot proof. Cut everything, if something is sticking up, cut that spot again.
