Nintendo systems tie ratio

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
User avatar
Gunstar Green
Next-Gen
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by Gunstar Green »

ZeroAX wrote:I'm more curious why the N64 tie ratio is so low. There weren't that many great games on it, but if you liked Nintendo's / Rare's games, you were probably going to buy as many of them as you can.
I'm sure there were a lot of niche die-hards, but most people I knew who owned the N64 in its day had a very few games for it, especially compared to the stacks of PlayStation CDs they usually also had.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by ZeroAX »

samsonlonghair wrote:Probably because N64 cartridges where significantly more expensive than PS1 or Saturn discs.
How much more expensive are we talking about? I honestly don't remember. And the difference in prices wasn't so high here
Gunstar Green wrote: I'm sure there were a lot of niche die-hards, but most people I knew who owned the N64 in its day had a very few games for it, especially compared to the stacks of PlayStation CDs they usually also had.
But it always seemed like a niche console to me. Funnily enough I always wanted an N64 much more than a PS1, even though the PS1's library has stood the test of time MUCH better (it helps that it had so many JRPGs)
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by samsonlonghair »

ZeroAX wrote:
samsonlonghair wrote:Probably because N64 cartridges were significantly more expensive than PS1 or Saturn discs.
How much more expensive are we talking about? I honestly don't remember. And the difference in prices wasn't so high here
Big pictures in spoiler tags. This may stretch out your browser window.
N64 games in 1997
Image
Sega Saturn games in 1997
Image
Sony Playstation games in 1997
Image
Playstation already had a Greatest Hits line by 1997
Image
By way of conversion, 60.00 US Dollars of 1997 are worth 81.73 US Dollars of 2014. 81.73 US Dollars equals 59.91 Euros.
Last edited by samsonlonghair on Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8875
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by alienjesus »

Yeah, for what it's worth, when I got an N64 in about 1999/2000 in the UK, N64 games were anywhere from £50-70 new and PS1 games were £30. So essentially double the price of the PS1.
Image
Frag Mortuus
Next-Gen
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Princeton, WV

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by Frag Mortuus »

samsonlonghair wrote:
ZeroAX wrote:
samsonlonghair wrote:Probably because N64 cartridges where significantly more expensive than PS1 or Saturn discs.
How much more expensive are we talking about? I honestly don't remember. And the difference in prices wasn't so high here
Big pictures in spoiler tags. This may stretch out your browser window.
N64 games in 1997
Image
Sega Saturn games in 1997
Image
Sony Playstation games in 1997
Image
Playstation already had a Greatest Hits line by 1997
Image
By way of conversion, 60.00 US Dollars of 1997 are worth 81.73 US Dollars of 2014. 81.73 US Dollars equals 59.91 Euros.
Very cool post. You should post more if you have them.
noiseredux wrote:Frag Mortuus rules.
Image

Sell/Trade/Want List
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by samsonlonghair »

Frag Mortuus wrote:Very cool post. You should post more if you have them.
Thanks, Frag Mortus.
I found the scans on this site:
http://huguesjohnson.com/scans.html
I rehosted the images above on tinypic.com because I didn't want to steal this guy's bandwidth.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by ZeroAX »

aaaaaaaou......that is very expensive. Yeah....I wonder how I didn't notice that price difference. I do remember game boy games were either 20$ for the cheap ones, and 30$ for the new and expensive ones, back when I lived in the US, so I thought these would retail at 50$ at worse :S
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
Jamisonia
128-bit
Posts: 955
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:21 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by Jamisonia »

SNES games could be even more expensive if they had enhancement chips. I vividly remember my parents refusing to buy SMRPG because it was $90 and I had almost beaten it from video store rentals. As a result I didn't beat it until I was an adult.

I also think Star Fox was $90 which is why I didn't get that when I was younger.
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

I find the fact that these days it's not so hard to less than $30 a game awesome.

I also find it amazing I had as many PS1 games as I did at the time. By the time the PS2 came out I had about PS1 games. I was getting a new game every other week. That is a LOT of money.

What I find even more amazing is that gaming still manages to be the most expensive hobby I partake in regardless of the fact that the prices have gone down dramatically. :lol:
Older. Not wiser.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Nintendo systems tie ratio

Post by ZeroAX »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:I find the fact that these days it's not so hard to less than $30 a game awesome.

I also find it amazing I had as many PS1 games as I did at the time. By the time the PS2 came out I had about PS1 games. I was getting a new game every other week. That is a LOT of money.

What I find even more amazing is that gaming still manages to be the most expensive hobby I partake in regardless of the fact that the prices have gone down dramatically. :lol:
I think you forgot a bunch of words brother. Maybe you were doing other things while writing this post and it ended up like this? :lol:

So how many games did you have on the PS1 by the time the PS2 was out? Also, the PS1 was an awesome system so it makes sense to have a lot of games for it 8)

I prefer the N64 personally, but I know I will get 10-15 games for it tops.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Post Reply