Jmustang1968 wrote:indecks wrote:Jmustang1968 wrote:
So you think Harry Potter was better written than Lord of the Rings?
No, that's not what I'm saying. Rowling isn't exactly a great writer herself. And as I said before in the Movies thread, the discussion wasn't which was a better story, or whatever (though that one was about HP and GoT), but rather on the (absent) merits of DSH's reasoning for not liking Potter.
Would you consider Shakespeare a bad writer?
I think part of what you don't like abouy the eay Tolkien writes is from the era he was from. The writing styles were different.
No I actually like Shakespeare. The problem with DSH is that he equates me saying someone is a terrible writer with "OH MAN LOTR SUXOR'D BECAUSE IT DIDNT TALK ABOUT LAZERS AND SHIT."
When in reality I said "he created a great universe that influenced fantasy books." He just didn't write it down very well. Just like Asimov was actually quite a boring writer. Again, Seldon's universe was grand, detailed and what not, but it was sort of flat because it was so slow paced. Just boring.
To me its like a Batman fanatic that can't believe you don't think Batman is the greatest superhero on the planet.
Hes not a superhero.
"WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU HES IN THE JLA"
hes a human with no powers.
BUT HES BAT... MAN. BATMAN.
Yeah, well hes cool and all and has great toys, but he's just kind of lame when you compare him to Hal Jordan, or even InsertNameHereMan.
BUT HES FUCKIN' BATMAN. YOURE SUCH A TOOL BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE A HERO AS MUCH AS
EVERYONE ELSE.
Yeah well. Too bad.
FUCKWAD!
@Ack, I wasn't trying to be offensive. I truly didn't read it. Maybe when he calms down.