Nope, not affected in a meaningful way, sorry... Retro games and modern games are a different scenario for me. I have already resigned myself knowing that many modern games have strong online components that won't be relevant in the future.TheSonicRetard wrote:You are always online, but microsoft is not. Remember when they were down for 3 weeks world-wide, days before christmas, a few years ago?Jmustang1968 wrote:I am always online and bought almost every game new for this gen. I didn't pay $60 for a good many of my games. You can usually find them new for the same price as used after a few months on Amazon. I will treat it more like a PC now. I haven't been able to sell most of those games for years now.TheSonicRetard wrote:
You're on a retro collecting site, and they just killed the prospect of second-hand sales and put a time limit on the lifespan of working games, and you're not affected?
You say you can find titles after a few months on Amazon. What about after a few years? Try to find me a retailer selling, for example, Outrun 2 for the Xbox 360 or PS3.
Your comparison to PC gaming is laughable. Steam doesn't require me to confirm that, yes, I bought my game every 24 hours.
You have a "my sales thread" link in your sig. You are affected.
Did this even come out for the 360? I know it is on the Xbox new right there...
I will treat it like my PC as far as how I buy games and collect for the system, so it isn't laughable at all.
I may not think they are necessarily good decisions or what I would prefer, but it isn't a deal breaker. Some of the always online components will add value and convenience in ways not offered by offline consoles. So I see it somewhat as a trade off where the negatives don't disrupt my ability to enjoy the console.
