Easy!Luke wrote:Who here, without the aid of a search engine, knows what VHS and VCR are acronyms for?
VCR = Video Cassette Recorder
VHS = Video Home System
My pet peeve is when someone calls a VCR a "VHS Player".
Easy!Luke wrote:Who here, without the aid of a search engine, knows what VHS and VCR are acronyms for?
Not quite, though. I'd say you have a better case for vinyl v. CD than SMB3 on NES v. SNES. Perhaps ROM v. cart? VirtualConsole v. cart?Ziggy587 wrote:But that's like saying why play SMB3 on the NES when you can play it on the SNES. Same game, inferior graphics.
Very true. SMB3 on SNES is simply different looking. Not really comparable to different video formats. I know people who don't care for the SNES version because of a few of the graphical changes made.o.pwuaioc wrote:Not quite, though. I'd say you have a better case for vinyl v. CD than SMB3 on NES v. SNES. Perhaps ROM v. cart? VirtualConsole v. cart?Ziggy587 wrote:But that's like saying why play SMB3 on the NES when you can play it on the SNES. Same game, inferior graphics.
That's the whole point of this thread.AppleQueso wrote:You could maybe make a case for arcade ports? Why play Street Fighter Alpha 2 on SNES when you could just play it on Saturn? That's kinda stretching it probably.
Perhaps if the player had no recording function, it could be called a VHS player.samsonlonghair wrote:My pet peeve is when someone calls a VCR a "VHS Player".
Leave it to Racketboy to always pull apart my off-the-wall analogies.AppleQueso wrote:Very true. SMB3 on SNES is simply different looking. Not really comparable to different video formats. I know people who don't care for the SNES version because of a few of the graphical changes made.o.pwuaioc wrote:Not quite, though. I'd say you have a better case for vinyl v. CD than SMB3 on NES v. SNES. Perhaps ROM v. cart? VirtualConsole v. cart?Ziggy587 wrote:But that's like saying why play SMB3 on the NES when you can play it on the SNES. Same game, inferior graphics.
You could maybe make a case for arcade ports? Why play Street Fighter Alpha 2 on SNES when you could just play it on Saturn? That's kinda stretching it probably.
But that isnt really true. A movie is basically the same on VHS or DVD/Blu Ray just different quality of a format, with no real sacrifice or drawback to the higher format. Retro games are often specific to their format and are unique entities/experiences. Many of the times they are remade on higher tech formats, they often contain some sacrifices or changes made from the original.Ziggy587 wrote:All I really meant to say is that usually the kind of person that will enjoy retro gaming will also have no problem still using a VCR. Wasn't really trying to compare video game consoles to VCRs and DVD players directly, per se, apples and oranges. Just that one can watch a VHS tape while Blu Rays exist, one can play the Atari 5200 while the PS3 exists.
I understand where you were coming from. But many enjoy record players as they feel it produces the best audio quality. Many are retro gamers because they think those are the best games. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone who thinks vhs is the best format for video. A lot of old tech has some redeeming qualities that new tech had to sacrifice. But with VHS I am hard pressed to find a redeeming quality over new tech.Ziggy587 wrote:Well the Star Wars BD release is loads better then the DVD release, but let's not go down that path.![]()
Yes, you can't really compare video games to movies. But all I mean to say is that a person who can enjoy old video games will usually also enjoy other old tech. Many of us here still use VCRs, quite a few of us like record players, and I know I'm not the only one to have a rotary phone hooked up. Et cetera, et cetera. These are all old tech, massively outdated by today's standard. Yet we still enjoy using them, just the same as we enjoy playing the NES.