Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean

A "Casual Sex" appears. Immunity to all consequences activated. Do you...

Proceed
12
44%
Avoid
15
56%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
lordofduct
Next-Gen
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: West Palm Beach

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by lordofduct »

Golgo 14 wrote:
Mozgus wrote:
Golgo 14 wrote:I'm not interested in casual sex, but I wouldn't side with you in this because your view of women is pretty ugly. You see yourself as good-natured and sensitive, open to a meaningful relationship with someone you respect, but you're not impressed by women and you see them as manipulative and privileged, acting in ways you find repulsive. Are you a gallant knight or a misogynist pig?
I'm Steve. Pleased to meet ya and welcome to the forums. :P

Anyway, internet demeanor is hardly representative of real life demeanor. Don't assume that you know anything about how I act based on some text.
Thanks for the welcome, Steve. I'm Fred.

I gathered from your posts that you haven't had much success with women and it seemed like that experience led you to unfavorable views on an entire gender. It happens, I know.

When I was in college (and not having any luck with girls) I wrote a paper about the social scene that bemoaned the game-playing and superficiality of casual relationships. Years later when things had changed a bit for me, I found that paper and thought, "damn, I was one bitter bastard".

Just because a lot of people are casual about sex and love, doesn't mean you have to be. Once I found a relationship on my own terms, it suddenly didn't matter to me that other people behave in ways that I wouldn't. Your experiences change your views. Sometimes for the better.
his point by that response was that how he may come across here on the forum isn't really a good mirror for who he actually is.

It's highly likely a lot of people act very different on the internet then they do in the real world. And may harbor varying "opinions" from the real world to the web world. This can be because they can spout their true beliefs out of anonymity, or because they like to explore other supposed opinions to learn more about it, amongst other reasons. I have meet forum users who pretended to be the opposite gender not for the attention, but out of utter paranoia someone would figure out who they actually were.

As for me, I sometimes will take on certain opinions I don't agree with actually to learn more about said view through the responses of other people. Some call that argumentative, a debater who creates conflict for the sake of conflict, and for some reason shun it. But take a debate course and you will notice you often take the side of a topic that you probably don't agree with. The reasons is to train yourself as a debater, but also get an unbias view of the topic from the other side of the table. Otherwise known as "wearing someone else's shoes for a day".

Basic interwebs 101.
www.lordofduct.com - check out my blog

Space Puppy Studios - games for gamers by gamers
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by Niode »

lordofduct wrote: his point by that response was that how he may come across here on the forum isn't really a good mirror for who he actually is.

It's highly likely a lot of people act very different on the internet then they do in the real world. And may harbor varying "opinions" from the real world to the web world. This can be because they can spout their true beliefs out of anonymity, or because they like to explore other supposed opinions to learn more about it, amongst other reasons. I have meet forum users who pretended to be the opposite gender not for the attention, but out of utter paranoia someone would figure out who they actually were.

As for me, I sometimes will take on certain opinions I don't agree with actually to learn more about said view through the responses of other people. Some call that argumentative, a debater who creates conflict for the sake of conflict, and for some reason shun it. But take a debate course and you will notice you often take the side of a topic that you probably don't agree with. The reasons is to train yourself as a debater, but also get an unbias view of the topic from the other side of the table. Otherwise known as "wearing someone else's shoes for a day".

Basic interwebs 101.
I'd definitely say you were a master debater LoD. ;)


Wanker!

Seriously though. It is good to look at an argument from both sides. It's the only way to have a truly balanced and informed opinion on something. Being biased is a bad thing and looking at something from a different point of view is a great way to alleviate that.

Then you just get internet trolls who just want to cause arguments because it gets them off or amuses them in some way. Those people I just want to e-slap.

Somebody needs to develop the e-slap. I want to punish people being douchebags over the internet. That would be so fun. It would need super-cow powers otherwise it would probably get abused... Who am I kidding, something like that would be abused straight away if it was ever introduced. Funny though...
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
User avatar
lordofduct
Next-Gen
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: West Palm Beach

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by lordofduct »

I agree completely. When I think of the "conflict for the sake of conflict" I think of the guy who just says no, offers up no valid reasoning, and the trolls along like the happy little git he is.

Was it penny-arcade who had the comic strip about the e-strangle thing? Now that's what I want!

I'm still wondering if that was a sarcastic patronization, or a tongue in cheek pun... the mini font leads me to believe the latter. Heh.
www.lordofduct.com - check out my blog

Space Puppy Studios - games for gamers by gamers
User avatar
Mozgus
Next-Gen
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 10:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by Mozgus »

lordofduct wrote:Was it penny-arcade who had the comic strip about the e-strangle thing? Now that's what I want!
Image
User avatar
disorderlyvision
128-bit
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:04 pm

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by disorderlyvision »

Mozgus wrote: Isn't it ironic then, how you're 5000x more successful with women than I am, but we tend to look at them the same way?

That wouldn't have anything to do with you not being a "manpig" would it?
User avatar
Mozgus
Next-Gen
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 10:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by Mozgus »

disorderlyvision wrote:
Mozgus wrote: Isn't it ironic then, how you're 5000x more successful with women than I am, but we tend to look at them the same way?

That wouldn't have anything to do with you not being a "manpig" would it?
Success meaning getting along with. Not so much about the actual nailing part. Duct seems great at both.
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: Are you all a bunch of manpigs?

Post by Niode »

lordofduct wrote:I agree completely. When I think of the "conflict for the sake of conflict" I think of the guy who just says no, offers up no valid reasoning, and the trolls along like the happy little git he is.

Was it penny-arcade who had the comic strip about the e-strangle thing? Now that's what I want!

I'm still wondering if that was a sarcastic patronization, or a tongue in cheek pun... the mini font leads me to believe the latter. Heh.
It was my lame attempt at a very poor excuse for a pun.

Get me one of those iStrangle-U right away!! I love that PA strip. I completely forgot about it until you mentioned it.

Also: http://www.pennyarcademerch.com/pat070381.html
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
Post Reply