Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

SMS, Genesis, 32X, Sega CD, Saturn, Dreamcast
User avatar
Crabmaster2000
128-bit
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:45 pm

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by Crabmaster2000 »

GSZX1337 wrote:The Sonic Cycle will probably go down as a brief period in Gaming History where Sega lost their shit and didn't know what to do with their icon. Assuming that Sega doesn't lose their shit again. :?
BurningDoom wrote:
AppleQueso wrote: Eh, I don't think it's that handhelds aren't the same "class", it's just that Sonic is a console franchise. It's just like how people don't really count the console Pokemon games.
But in the Sonic games' case, the handheld games are better than the console games that people are associating with the series.
I completely agree with BurningDoom and ZeroAX in that for about a decade, the handheld titles were the only good Sonic games. However, they don't get the same attention as the console games. Not that they deserve to be cast aside, it's just that franchises such as Sonic have their console titles given a higher level of importance and attention. It's like this with Zelda, Mario, Jak, Ratchet & Clank, etc. This perception is probably the most prevalent with PC game franchises. I mean, how many people really talk about Duke Nukem: Time to Kill or StarCraft 64.
Crabmaster2000 wrote:I REALLY enjoyed Sonic and the Secret Rings. I can't be the only one, can I?
I haven't played Sonic and the Secret Rings, but I have played its "sequel": Sonic and the Black Knight, which was fucking terrible.
I did not realize that Black Knight was related to Secret of the Rings. I'll have to check it out now.
Want to see someone barely eke through a whole pile of NES games? Check out my youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2000Crabmaster?feature=mhee

250 NES games beaten since October 2011

Co-Host of the Rfgeneration Collectorcast:
http://rfgenerationcollectorcast.podomatic.com/
AppleQueso

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by AppleQueso »

I don't have a lot of faith in how Sega handles their own IPs these days. They pretty much killed Valkyria Chronicles right out of the gate, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised (though I'd definitely be disappointed) if they completely kill the good will and momentum Sonic's finally managed to start building up again.
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by MrPopo »

AppleQueso wrote:I don't have a lot of faith in how Sega handles their own IPs these days. They pretty much killed Valkyria Chronicles right out of the gate, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised (though I'd definitely be disappointed) if they completely kill the good will and momentum Sonic's finally managed to start building up again.
Mmm... VC was more a case of them not knowing how to sell it in the US, so the next two titles became Japan focused and released on the PSP. But I'm still pissed they never brought over 7th Dragon.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by ZeroAX »

AppleQueso wrote:I don't have a lot of faith in how Sega handles their own IPs these days. They pretty much killed Valkyria Chronicles right out of the gate, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised (though I'd definitely be disappointed) if they completely kill the good will and momentum Sonic's finally managed to start building up again.
I have not played the PSP games. How did they mess it up compared to the gem that was the original?
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
AppleQueso

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by AppleQueso »

ZeroAX wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:I don't have a lot of faith in how Sega handles their own IPs these days. They pretty much killed Valkyria Chronicles right out of the gate, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised (though I'd definitely be disappointed) if they completely kill the good will and momentum Sonic's finally managed to start building up again.
I have not played the PSP games. How did they mess it up compared to the gem that was the original?
I haven't really played them either, but shoving a franchise like that over to the PSP was pretty much a surefire way to kill sales. Hence why we never even got the 3rd one in the US.

General consensus on the second one at least seems to be that it's nowhere near as good as the Ps3 original.

I'm pretty confident that if they'd done a sequel on the Ps3 instead and given it a good marketing push in the west, it would've done better than the original. All the great word of mouth and hype built up would've really worked in its favor.
User avatar
BoneSnapDeez
Next-Gen
Posts: 20148
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:08 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by BoneSnapDeez »

I haven't kept up with Sonic at all.

The three most current games I own are Sonic Adventure (Dreamcast), Sonic the Hedgehog: Pocket Adventure (NGPC), and Sonic Advance 2 (GBA). They're all pretty decent.

Now I feel inundated with Sonic games and I can't separate the good from the crap. Maybe I should read through this thread. 8)
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by ZeroAX »

AppleQueso wrote: I'm pretty confident that if they'd done a sequel on the Ps3 instead and given it a good marketing push in the west, it would've done better than the original. All the great word of mouth and hype built up would've really worked in its favor.
I don't know mate. I'm afraid they would just have added needless "new" gameplay features instead of cutting out some of the fat that was plaguing the first game (like the way too many menus).

I think this series would have gone downhill like Advance Wars did after the first game. When the original is so well made, there's not a lot you can change for the sequel...
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
AppleQueso

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by AppleQueso »

ZeroAX wrote:
AppleQueso wrote: I'm pretty confident that if they'd done a sequel on the Ps3 instead and given it a good marketing push in the west, it would've done better than the original. All the great word of mouth and hype built up would've really worked in its favor.
I don't know mate. I'm afraid they would just have added needless "new" gameplay features instead of cutting out some of the fat that was plaguing the first game (like the way too many menus).

I think this series would have gone downhill like Advance Wars did after the first game. When the original is so well made, there's not a lot you can change for the sequel...
Whether it would've been an improvement over the original is definitely up for debate, I'm just thinking in terms of success/sales/whatever.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by ZeroAX »

AppleQueso wrote:
Whether it would've been an improvement over the original is definitely up for debate, I'm just thinking in terms of success/sales/whatever.
oh yeah, absolutely. I don't know what they were thinking with porting it to a portable. On the one hand it's turn based, but on the other hand the battles could last a long while, and a lack of an overhead view ala Advance Wars made it a chore to pause and continue a battle a couple of days later.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
MulishaSoldier929
32-bit
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:56 pm

Re: Is the Sonic Cycle a Myth?

Post by MulishaSoldier929 »

Not sure I 100% agree with the cycle starting in '96. Sonic 3d Blast was definitely when the series started to slip but I wouldn't go as far as saying that it was a terrible game, just not great. Same goes for SA 1 & 2. Sure they haven't aged great but at the time(especially SA 1) It was visually jaw dropping and a huge step for 3d gaming so you could look past some of the now more noticable issues we see today.
Beer it go good with pizza
Post Reply