
Repurposing this thread for all Far Cry games, past and present.


prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.

It's built in achievements / rewards system (Which you buy 'dlc' with achievement points) is decent, though often I have had to restart the client / game to get my achievement points to pop up. Most other things are pretty bad compared to Steam or even Origin.Pulsar_t wrote:Anyone has the latest Uplay executable? Is it more flexible nowadays?
It is maddeningly difficult. It's still one of the better examples of an FPS game with wide open spaces though.dsheinem wrote:I haven't yet played the original Far Cry.
Not really. More difficult than the average FPS, but I've beat it multiple times.J T wrote:It is maddeningly difficult.
Definitely. Wide open, but not so much so that getting around becomes a chore.J T wrote:It's still one of the better examples of an FPS game with wide open spaces though.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
I loved it, the second monsters came into it, it fell to the shit.J T wrote:It is maddeningly difficult. It's still one of the better examples of an FPS game with wide open spaces though.dsheinem wrote:I haven't yet played the original Far Cry.
I don't know what's with great FPS games that drop in quality later on. Half-Life sent you to Xen, Halo unleashed the Flood, Far Cry introduced mutants, Crysis brought aliens.emwearz wrote:I loved it, the second monsters came into it, it fell to the shit.J T wrote:It is maddeningly difficult. It's still one of the better examples of an FPS game with wide open spaces though.dsheinem wrote:I haven't yet played the original Far Cry.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.