PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Gaming on the Playstation and Xbox Platforms
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

So. I have one! And these are my impressions...

Top loader:

Not as cheap as all these reviewers would lead you to believe. It certainly doesn't feel any cheaper than previous top-loaders I've used, and it certainly feels better than the PS2 Slim...

Plastics:

The plastics on the sides feel cheap, and the system itself doesn't look all that expensive. That said, in person, the design is actually quite nice.

Size:

All consoles should be this size. It's not much bigger than a Genesis 1, and that's a huge plus for me.

Noise:

Did you like the Dreamcast BRRRP BRRP WOOSH noise? If so, you'll love this thing. The drive is pretty well insulated from every angle but the top. You can hear the laser working under there. That said, the fans are very nice and quiet, and the unit really only makes much noise from the aforementioned disc drive.

Packing:

The Uncharted bundle consists of a regular 250gb model stuffed in a cardboard sleeve that tells you it's the Uncharted bundle, and the game and Dust 514 code are just lazily slipped in next to the PS3. However the box is quite nice looking and doesn't take up a lot of space.

Also, when will Sony learn that they really should include an HDMI cable with their, ya know, premier HD gaming system? It has composite cables in the box. Half the TVs on the market have axed everything but HDMI. Unacceptable. Especially at $279.99.

No more swiveling PS logo:

Yup, no more vertical PS logo for you. The logo is molded into the plastic this time around, so those that liked that feature will have to give that up this time around.

Overall, if you have a PS3 Slim, there's not much of a reason to upgrade to the "Super" Slim. If you have a fat PS3 that doesn't play PS2 games, I'd probably recommend this one. I like the feel and look better than the normal Slim for sure.

Here it is next to a 360 pad

Image
Older. Not wiser.
harper
Next-Gen
Posts: 2532
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by harper »

I don't know, I don't like the ridges on the top, looks like it'd be a pain in the ass to clean if it gets even the slightest bit dusty. I'll admit it still looks pretty slick but the regular old slim works for me.
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by isiolia »

Yeah, I like the Slim better. Not a fan of the ridges, or the gloss plastic for that matter.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by BoringSupreez »

I can swap the hard drive out of my old slim and put it into a super slim and have it be just like I'm using my old PS3, right?

I figure I'll buy a super slim once they're cheap, for use as my permanent PS3 which I'll keep until it breaks. I automatically trust any game console that top-loads over something with a mechanical feeding system.

Can anyone get pictures of a super slim next to a regular slim? Even better: all three models lined up together.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

BoringSupreez wrote:I can swap the hard drive out of my old slim and put it into a super slim and have it be just like I'm using my old PS3, right?

I figure I'll buy a super slim once they're cheap, for use as my permanent PS3 which I'll keep until it breaks. I automatically trust any game console that top-loads over something with a mechanical feeding system.

Can anyone get pictures of a super slim next to a regular slim? Even better: all three models lined up together.
Google's got ya covered. :wink:
Image
Older. Not wiser.
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by isiolia »

BoringSupreez wrote:I can swap the hard drive out of my old slim and put it into a super slim and have it be just like I'm using my old PS3, right?
I don't believe that you can transfer the HDD like that (with a 360 you could, but a PS3 will want to format the drive), however, provided your old system is still working you can utilize the Data Transfer Utility to migrate data over a network connection.

You can also back data up and restore it as described here.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by BoringSupreez »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:Can anyone get pictures of a super slim next to a regular slim? Even better: all three models lined up together.
Google's got ya covered. :wink:
Image
Cool.

Looks like the footprint hasn't shrunk much over time... but of course I'm sure the SS is shorter than the first two. Hopefully, they reduced power consumption again.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by irixith »

BoringSupreez wrote:Hopefully, they reduced power consumption again.
This is what I'm most interested in. If the power consumption has been reduced from the slim model, I'll have a slim for sale so I can go get a super slim. Electricity is expensive where I live, and power consumption is the number one factor for me now.
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

irixith wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:Hopefully, they reduced power consumption again.
This is what I'm most interested in. If the power consumption has been reduced from the slim model, I'll have a slim for sale so I can go get a super slim. Electricity is expensive where I live, and power consumption is the number one factor for me now.
It's not much. From 200w to 190.
Older. Not wiser.
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: PS3 Super Slim... disappointed?

Post by irixith »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
irixith wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:Hopefully, they reduced power consumption again.
This is what I'm most interested in. If the power consumption has been reduced from the slim model, I'll have a slim for sale so I can go get a super slim. Electricity is expensive where I live, and power consumption is the number one factor for me now.
It's not much. From 200w to 190.
Thanks!

Makes only pennies worth of difference on the bill, not enough to matter.
Post Reply