32x and what was Sega thinking?

SMS, Genesis, 32X, Sega CD, Saturn, Dreamcast
User avatar
ja_le_co
8-bit
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by ja_le_co »

noiseredux wrote:Actually, I remember that all this hardware confused me at the time. I had stayed with Sega up through Sega CD, and loved it. But 32X confused me


There was something so exciting about CD technology at the time. I think there was something unique (for me) about having an add-on, but when the 32X came, it was like "another add-on, really?" It's hard to recall if my dubious feelings naturally occurred, or if I was swayed by the opinions of the magazines at the time.

I vividly remember logging onto CompuServe's videogame section to see pics of Virtua Fighter for the upcoming Saturn and getting excited for a Sega product again. Never bought one though.
User avatar
Gunstar Green
Next-Gen
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by Gunstar Green »

shallowgamer wrote:SOA was thinking the same thing Sony and MS are thinking now. "We've got a huge install base, why not squeeze as much life out of this as possible?" But mentioning that a better product would be out soon when pimping out your new piece of hardware probably wasn't bright.


That's where the East vs. West headbutting comes into play. SoA wanted them to hold off on the Saturn because the Genesis was still doing well in the United States and SoJ wanted to move on because the Mega Drive's popularity was pretty abysmal in Japan.

SoA gets demonized but their idea actually sounded good on paper from the standpoint of the American market. In hindsight yes, they should have just dropped it and let Sega move on with the Saturn which they initially thought was further down the line than it actually was, which turned the 32X from its original purpose as a stop-gap into a pointless upgrade.

SoJ deserves some blame here as well, things arguably could've gone a lot better if instead of making the 32X they just continued to support the Genesis up until after the Saturn's release. Instead they just dropped all support early and let the Super Nintendo run away with the market share, making it look like to the consumer that Sega had just given up.
dtrack
24-bit
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:59 am

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by dtrack »

This 2001 pic alone worth checking this topic!
32x was about Mortal Kombat 2 for me. All the ports sucked bad (however the PC was decent with a strong hardware). Genesis had weak colors, animation (and no crouch punch even with a 6-button pad?), snes had ultra low resolution and full of glitches, and low of everything. PSX and Saturn had loading times and misplaced audio and so on. 32x is still the shit if you don't count emulation. Virtua Racing was also good but then the Saturn was slightly better maybe. The only issue was me, i never owned one :cry:
Other than that: garbage.
2001.gif
[/quote]
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by Erik_Twice »

dtrack wrote:Virtua Racing was also good but then the Saturn was slightly better maybe.

Protip: Now handhelds can emulate the 32x so you can play Virtua Racing on the go. That's pretty awesome! Now if we could only get Daytona ported...
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
User avatar
ExedExes
Next-Gen
Posts: 7331
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:56 pm
Location: HI-POINT AREA

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by ExedExes »

dtrack wrote:Virtua Racing was also good but then the Saturn was slightly better maybe.


One of the few 32X games I did enjoy was VIRT-YA RACING DELUXE. I got the title right. Get a copy and check out the voices :lol:

Metalhead was another one, but thanks to the stupid radar that breaks down halfway through your mission for some reason, it's no good.
Image
Xeogred wrote:The obvious answer is that it's time for the Dreamcast 2.
User avatar
bryan_65
Next-Gen
Posts: 1151
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by bryan_65 »

dtrack wrote:32x was about Mortal Kombat 2 for me........32x is still the shit if you don't count emulation


I will have to agree. I still play that port once every week or two.
Breetai
Next-Gen
Posts: 5100
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Make you humble in Canada

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by Breetai »

ja_le_co wrote:
noiseredux wrote:There was something so exciting about CD technology at the time. I think there was something unique (for me) about having an add-on, but when the 32X came, it was like "another add-on, really?" It's hard to recall if my dubious feelings naturally occurred, or if I was swayed by the opinions of the magazines at the time.

I don't think it was just the magazines. I had a Sega CD and was PISSED that Sega sort of ditched it in in favour of another add-on. The Sega CD was not cheap, either; not even when the 32X came out. I didn't need any magazine to tell me to skip over the 32X and wait for the Saturn. Others like me were even more upset at Sega and didn't even give the Saturn a second look.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by noiseredux »

That was me breetai.
Image
Breetai
Next-Gen
Posts: 5100
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Make you humble in Canada

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by Breetai »

noiseredux wrote:That was me breetai.

I did the best I could while posting from the toilet. :mrgreen:
User avatar
RCBH928
Next-Gen
Posts: 6063
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:40 am

Re: 32x and what was Sega thinking?

Post by RCBH928 »

General_Norris wrote:
kingmohd84 wrote:Any way I do not recall many , if any , add-ons that improve graphics.

I haven't seen any add-on that doesn't :lol:


I meant to say I have not seen Graphic Improving Add-ons much :lol:
Most add-ons are to connect other devices like a light-Guns, modem, memory card, keyboards. The following extremely popular consoles never had graphic improving add-ons as far as I know:
Gamecube, Dreamcast, PS2,oXbox, SNES,NES, Gameboy,Gamegear, Neo-Geo, Master System,Wii, psx.

I think the only consoles that had graphics improving add-ons are:
Genesis, N64(You really dont feel it), and the PC engine CD .

I also did not know that the Sega CD improved graphics, I thought it just let the Genesis read CDs
Post Reply