I do not think that I missed the context. He said that he knew someone who was paid to defend criminals and that this person had successfully defended some individuals that were not "very clearly not guilty". You said that this person did not have a conscience because he had been paid to defend - sometimes successfully - people that might have committed crimes. I responded that these people have a difficult - and often despised - job that is nonetheless necessary to the proper functioning of the United States justice system.D.D.D. wrote:What you said does not match the integrity of that dude's friend, exaggerated or not, you missed the context.
I practice law ethically, but like many lawyers, I do so to provide for my family, pay my mortgage, and pay off my student loans. Hopefully, this does not make me a bad person.D.D.D. wrote:If you actually are a lawyer to uphold the law, not do it for money regardless of the law, then you're fine.
I agree. Crime is bad, and if you commit a crime, the consequences may be severe.D.D.D. wrote:True, most people who commit crimes are poor but then again, are also stupid. Don't break the law and you're likely not going to have many problems in life. Having something "planted" on your or in your house, is another issue. Same thing though, if you break the law or attract attention to you in a bad way, something bad may happen, so maybe don't smoke weed etc.
The United States justice system does not always achieve perfect results. Some innocent people are punished and some guilty people go free. Having some experience with foreign systems, however, I nonetheless think that the adversarial system remains the best justice system in the world.D.D.D. wrote:I know enough how the US legal system works (to a fair extent - 3 lawyers in the family) and nothing you said is new. I still think the US legal system is messed up. Too many loopholes, too much leniency, and too bogged down by bogus lawsuits and people who just want to exploit it.
As I stated in my post, I do not defend criminals. If I did, however, I would do my very best to represent their interests.D.D.D. wrote:Good for you to defend criminals. Keep up the good work.
EDIT: I started my previous post with a rude comment. It has been removed, and I apologize for it. I should have merely started with my argument.