I actually like McDonalds food. I know it's low grade and unhealthy, but I don't care. It still tastes good to me.General_Norris wrote:There's something funny about quality. It's often claimed that people play or listen to bad art because they don't know better. But yet, everyone knows McDonalds is bad. Everyone. But it's incredibly popular.
This is something I have pondered for a while and decided to comment it here after watching Roger Ebert discuss the issue on some random video. His quality as a critic aside, he was surprised that when you he told people about one of the best movies ever made or about a power film or similar stuff, people were like "Eeeh, it's cool but I want something less".
And I think it's interesting to think why this happens. I have my own theories but I don't want to lead the coversation.
What do you think? Why do people who know something is better choose mediocre or even bad works over it?
I was thinking about this idea just last night on a different topic. I was wondering why kids watch the Disney channel. Not everything on there is bad, but a large portion are pretty low quality. You can see the jokes coming a mile away and they aren't very original. The acting is usually bad. The "serious" moments in the shows are extremely forced and cheesy.
If the kids seemed to be enjoying it, I would simply write it of as them having a different taste in comedy. But they don't seem to enjoy it. It seems the target audience hardly cracks a smile. I don't understand why a person would watch a show like that, when there are other shows they actually laugh at.
I think it might be the familiarity of the brand or perhaps watching the channel is just a habit. Those could be the same reasons some people eat at McDonalds. It's sort of a familiar American tradition like Mickey Mouse or Coca Cola.