Yes. Yes it is.AppleQueso wrote:Is it better than Alien 3?
That's all I ask of it...
At the very least it's certainly a hell of a lot better than Resurrection.
Yes. Yes it is.AppleQueso wrote:Is it better than Alien 3?
That's all I ask of it...
Yeah. I consider Aliens to be Cameron's best work BY FAR, still has its nuisances though like the kid and silly junk like that. Thank goodness it doesn't have any of his awful romances.sabrage wrote:As much as I love Aliens... Scott can direct circles around Cameron any day.
Dude I put the AvP's above Resurrection. That one is seriously one of the worst movies I've ever seen.Michi wrote:At the very least it's certainly a hell of a lot better than Resurrection.
Oh I agree. I was just using it as an easy Alien-movie-related quality reference.Xeogred wrote:Dude I put the AvP's above Resurrection. That one is seriously one of the worst movies I've ever seen.Michi wrote:At the very least it's certainly a hell of a lot better than Resurrection.
Tom Hiddleston. You may be happy to know he will reprise his role of Loki in Thor 2!Too bored to research who played "Loki", but he was excellent as well. Very pleased and excited for the prospects of this franchise.
I'm waiting for someone to Garfield without Garfield Edward Furlong out of T2 so I can ever watch it again.Xeogred wrote:@indecks: I want to imagine Scott doesn't give a crap about anything post-Alien, haha... but who knows. It would be interesting to see what he considers canon and not in his mind.
I still have a soft spot for T1 as well though. And I'll admit T2 is fun. So these three are his best in my book. If he just sticks to action it's good stuff. Other than that I guess he just has a lot of money to keep going or something... nothing that special about him.
PSN: Green-Whiskeyninjainspandex wrote:Maybe I'm just a pervert