holaback wrote:sorry about the tittle....some gay online game.
the best era of games was befor online gaming
Couldn't disagree more. If all online games are terrible, that'd have to apply to most, if not all multiplayer games.
In addition, for the most part, unless you've got a server plagued with hackers, playing online is the same as playing Singleplayer, only you're playing against human players - unless all the players play poorly, this can only serve to improve the quality of gameplay because it makes things less predictable.
One thing I can agree with, however, is that thusfar modern games are far from reaching the heights of the 16-bit era - albeit I don't hold to the view that modern games are just plain worse than retro games.
In addition, for the most part, unless you've got a server plagued with hackers, playing online is the same as playing Singleplayer, only you're playing against human players - unless all the players play poorly, this can only serve to improve the quality of gameplay because it makes things less predictable.
One thing I can agree with, however, is that thusfar modern games are far from reaching the heights of the 16-bit era - albeit I don't hold to the view that modern games are just plain worse than retro games.
-
pixelbender
- 24-bit
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:24 pm
My favorite systems are my Dreamcast and my 360. What really needs to happen is have multiplayer games that evolve like a single player. Thus, instead of playing the same multiplayer map all day, the experience would be like a single player game but with the better (or at least hopefully less predictable) AI of human players.
Personally I like both. Many of my greatest memories involve myself and my friends sitting in a computer lab playing a game together. I've seen some of the craziest stuff in games because of this, and let me tell you...you should try playing with some of the folks I've played with. Many of my best stories come from that. But it does make a good point. Play with friends. If you're going to play an MMO, get several friends to play with you. My buddies and I tried WoW together, and while many of us took to enjoying different aspects of the game, we were always friendly and helpful to each other. Some of the most fun I had would be grinding with a Warlock-playing buddy of mine, or stalking other players for World PvP with a friend that played Rogue. In Battlefield 2142, enough of my friends joined that we could put out a fully formed squad. We had at least one of every class, and when we all teamed up, we could hold a point for an entire map, or take a point in no time. Everybody knew everybody's strengths and weaknesses, so we'd augment ourselves to help each other out. End result, our entire clan was claimed as proof people were hacking in the game on EA's forums, because we worked so well with each other.
When you've got friends and you've played together long enough, you learn all kinds of ways to support each other, and you learn to be a better overall player. If you want, here's a short list of stuff I played to help my buddies:
WoW: Warrior
Guild Wars: Mesmer
TFC/Fortress Forever: Medic
Battlefield 2142: Support, defensive spec
Call of Duty: American-BAR, British-Bren LMG, Russian-PPSh, German-Scoped Kar98k or MP40
And in Warhammer, I'm looking at playing the Squig Herder.
When you've got friends and you've played together long enough, you learn all kinds of ways to support each other, and you learn to be a better overall player. If you want, here's a short list of stuff I played to help my buddies:
WoW: Warrior
Guild Wars: Mesmer
TFC/Fortress Forever: Medic
Battlefield 2142: Support, defensive spec
Call of Duty: American-BAR, British-Bren LMG, Russian-PPSh, German-Scoped Kar98k or MP40
And in Warhammer, I'm looking at playing the Squig Herder.
I think the term "prejudice" satisfies both ends.xraydash wrote:Uh-huh. Clueless or obnoxious, I can't decide which.dsheinem wrote:holaback wrote:sorry about the tittle....some gay online game.
There was a Source-engine game called The Crossing that was supposed to do just that. Unfortunately, it's TBA.pixelbender wrote:What really needs to happen is have multiplayer games that evolve like a single player.
Back to the topic, The Internet just about changed the way we do everything. We had CDs and LPs, we now have MP3s; we had Blockbuster, now we have NetFlix; we had TV, now we have YouTube; we had gaming magazines, now we have gaming websites. Gaming is no different. If you're a PC gamer, then you probably know that Steam is one of the greatest things that has happened in PC Gaming. Steam has digital distribution, auto patching, in-game chatting (IM or VOIP with people in your game), and more. I think the Internet has changed gaming (along with other things, for the better.
Make your own!I dont think you can say that online gaming is equally as good as singleplayer because although that might be true for some, what about people who like story in their games?
Besides, once the story's over, it's over. Nobody plays Streets of Rage, Road Rash or Sonic the Hedgehog for the story - if you do, you're a freak.
As Ack pointed out, online play is a great way to improve your overall skill - not just with the one game, I might add. Course, it's mostly all down to who you're playing with.