Backloggery vs RF Generation

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by o.pwuaioc »

ExedExes wrote:Thank you all for suggesting RF Generation! I used IGN's collection feature back in the day, but it wasn't as comprehensive and easy to use as RFG's is. It was real fun studying the labels to my Atari 2600 games and the screws on the back of the NES games also seeing what type of Seal of Quality they had :lol: But yeah it's finally complete and now it's also linkable so check out the greatness of my humble 250 games :)
2600 fan, huh? This thread is turning out to be all sorts of informative. ;P
User avatar
ElkinFencer10
Next-Gen
Posts: 8963
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Elkin, North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by ElkinFencer10 »

ExedExes wrote:Thank you all for suggesting RF Generation! I used IGN's collection feature back in the day, but it wasn't as comprehensive and easy to use as RFG's is. It was real fun studying the labels to my Atari 2600 games and the screws on the back of the NES games also seeing what type of Seal of Quality they had :lol: But yeah it's finally complete and now it's also linkable so check out the greatness of my humble 250 games :)
Your 2600 collection - I'm jealous of it.
Patron Saint of Bitch Mode
User avatar
ExedExes
Next-Gen
Posts: 7331
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:56 pm
Location: HI-POINT AREA

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by ExedExes »

o.pwuaioc wrote:2600 fan, huh? This thread is turning out to be all sorts of informative. ;P
ElkinFencer10 wrote:Your 2600 collection - I'm jealous of it.
I knew I had a ton of 2600 games, but for that to barely beat out my nice DC set? Yeah I'm a bit shocked :lol:

2 reasons why I have as many of those as I do --

1) I did not get an NES till Christmas of 1989, was still rocking out the 7800 (which I still have)

2) A year or two before that someone my dad knew just gave away nearly 50 of those games to me. Obviously by the late 80s the 2600 was getting a bit stale :lol: That's why there are a few Sears-branded titles mixed in too with the other games.
Image
Xeogred wrote:The obvious answer is that it's time for the Dreamcast 2.
User avatar
Zing
Next-Gen
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by Zing »

RFG doesn't differentiate between NES oval seal with ™ and ®! Useless. :D
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
User avatar
ExedExes
Next-Gen
Posts: 7331
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:56 pm
Location: HI-POINT AREA

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by ExedExes »

Zing wrote:RFG doesn't differentiate between NES oval seal with ™ and ®! Useless. :D
But it does go by the number of screws in the back of the games. That's important these days. :lol:
Image
Xeogred wrote:The obvious answer is that it's time for the Dreamcast 2.
User avatar
Zing
Next-Gen
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by Zing »

Is it bad that I track both attributes in my personal spreadsheet?
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
User avatar
ElkinFencer10
Next-Gen
Posts: 8963
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Elkin, North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by ElkinFencer10 »

Zing wrote:Is it bad that I track both attributes in my personal spreadsheet?
I was starting to worry that it's bad that I don't care about either. lol Somewhere between the two of us is where we both should be...
Patron Saint of Bitch Mode
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by o.pwuaioc »

Zing wrote:RFG doesn't differentiate between NES oval seal with ™ and ®! Useless. :D
You know, anyone can submit a new variant. I have seen carts that specify without ® before, so I know they exist in the database. If they're missing some (it's an ever on-going project), you should submit them.
User avatar
ExedExes
Next-Gen
Posts: 7331
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:56 pm
Location: HI-POINT AREA

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by ExedExes »

o.pwuaioc wrote:
Zing wrote:RFG doesn't differentiate between NES oval seal with ™ and ®! Useless. :D
You know, anyone can submit a new variant. I have seen carts that specify without ® before, so I know they exist in the database. If they're missing some (it's an ever on-going project), you should submit them.
Yes, they approved a change I made on a release year for Bart Simpson's Escape From Camp Deadly for Game Boy. It was erroneously listed as 1993, when it in fact came out in 1991.

Ok ok so I do feel for Zing and I probably would have acted the same. Never knew there were so many re-releases and variants on Atari and Nintendo titles back in the day till I went over to RFG :lol:
Image
Xeogred wrote:The obvious answer is that it's time for the Dreamcast 2.
User avatar
Duke.Togo
128-bit
Posts: 568
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:52 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Backloggery vs RF Generation

Post by Duke.Togo »

I submit games, info, and corrections to RF Gen a lot. That site relies on the users to keep the database up to date. Check out some of the SMS variants and you can see how detailed it gets.
Post Reply