What was the last movie you've seen?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Bootaaay
128-bit
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:31 am
Location: England

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Bootaaay »

On the Silver Globe (1988) by Andrzej Żuławski

This ambitious Polish science-fiction film first began production in 1975, but in 1977, with eighty percent of filming complete, the Polish government ordered production to stop and all sets, costumes and footage to be destroyed, over fears that some themes present in the film were an allegorical criticism of Poland's communist rule. The surviving reels of footage, smuggled out of Poland by the director and crew, lay dormant until the fall of communism and, although incomplete, the film was finally released in 1988. As much of the footage was lost or indeed never filmed, the narrative was incomplete and in a daring move Żuławski decided to narrate the missing scenes and include their destruction as part of the narrative, this narration being presented over footage of a busy Polish city that zips by the camera as Żuławski fills in the gaps, also providing clear dividing points between the three main acts.

Image Image

The film itself deals with the cyclical nature of existence, the ethics of freedom, the power of belief and the dangers of allowing that belief to fuel ideology, all told through the anthropology of an emerging society created when three astronauts from Earth crash land on a distant planet. For the film's first act we follow the point of view Peter who records events on a video-camera, as he, Marta & Thomas attempt to survive and start a new life in the barren, alien wilderness. After Marta becomes pregnant and gives birth to Thomas' baby, the astronauts realise that the child is growing at an accelerated rate. The film jumps forwards erratically as we are presented with snippets of a society emerging in front of Peter's camera lens, as the astronaut's children grow to maturity and themselves begin to procreate. The children begin to deify their astronaut parents, who seemingly never age as generations pass. The first act ends with Marta and Thomas dead and Peter, now referred to only as 'The Old Man', alone in a society of his children who do not understand his ravings, nor why he will not die like the others and ultimately they begin to resent his presence. Eventually, Peter returns to his space-craft and sends his hours of recorded footage back to Earth.

Image Image

The second act revolves around Marek, the owner of the space agency that funded the first mission, who himself heads to the planet to escape the pain of a lost love, only to find a savage, incomprehensible and divided society of people who have been awaiting his prophesied arrival. He is regarded as their messiah and through his eyes we are introduced to the advancements in the beliefs and structure of the society since we last saw them. Marek becomes embroiled in his role as deity, guiding the society under his rule and leading the charge against a race of bird-like creatures from across the sea called 'Sherns' who steal women to mate with and produce mutated half-human, half-Shern offspring. The final act takes place primarily on Earth, where another astronaut named Jack is attempting to discern what befell Marek's mission to the planet. He is caught up in an affair with Ava, the woman for whom Marek left Earth, and in a fit of drug addled depression he himself heads to the planet, only to find the people's messiah, Marek, crucified in grisly fashion. Ultimately, Żuławski is dealing with some heavy themes here, asserting that humanity has a need to continually create and destroy his gods, that without belief there cannot be understanding and that without understanding their can be no happiness.

Image Image

The world Żuławski presents is stark and beautiful, the Baltic shores, Caucasus mountains and Mongolian desert providing the barren and isolated landscapes that so capture the imagination throughout the film, but also it's the wonderfully designed costumes and props and cold, grey-blue cinematography that lend these places a true alien feel. Overall 'On the Silver Globe' is as intriguing as it is impenetrable. The frenetic camera work launches us directly into the midst of the chaos on-screen, events later explained more by action than dialogue as characters descend further into erratic and emotional madness, exploring the reasons for their being and the world around them through pained and awkward ad-libbed philosophical diatribes. While the narrative is most certainly confused, partly because of the unique journey of the film's production and release, and partly because of the confounding dialogue, the over-reaching story told is one that still conveys a powerful message about the nature of belief in human society and the desire to comprehend our existence. While most certainly not a film for everyone, 'On the Silver Globe' is a tough two and a half hour experience to endure, but one that repays it's viewer's diligence with some compelling food for thought and some truly beautiful cinematic scenes.
dsheinem wrote:The Descendants (2011) – While I enjoyed this film and found the way in which it dealt with the subject matter at hand to be quite compelling, I am a little surprised it is getting as much Oscar buzz for best picture as it is. More melodrama than comedy, the standout work of this film is in the character acting, the cinematography, and the score – each of which I felt worked to prop up an otherwise fairly average plot. There are some cool moments in the film and it is nice to see Clooney at least a little bit outside of his comfort zone of the snarky, alpha-male, and /or quirky character. It was a fun one to watch with my wife and I recommend it, but it doesn’t feel like best picture material to me.
I definitely agree on this, it doesn't at all feel like best picture material - but then again, neither was Hurt Locker or Slumdog Millionaire. I really enjoyed Clooney's performance, but as you said, the plot is fairly average and not all that compelling for me at least. I haven't seen War Horse yet, but it seems tailor made for Speilberg to coast to the best picture nod.
Image
PSN; Bootaaay ---------------------------------------------------------------- XBL; B007444Y
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

Bootaaay wrote:
dsheinem wrote:The Descendants (2011) – While I enjoyed this film and found the way in which it dealt with the subject matter at hand to be quite compelling, I am a little surprised it is getting as much Oscar buzz for best picture as it is. More melodrama than comedy, the standout work of this film is in the character acting, the cinematography, and the score – each of which I felt worked to prop up an otherwise fairly average plot. There are some cool moments in the film and it is nice to see Clooney at least a little bit outside of his comfort zone of the snarky, alpha-male, and /or quirky character. It was a fun one to watch with my wife and I recommend it, but it doesn’t feel like best picture material to me.
I definitely agree on this, it doesn't at all feel like best picture material - but then again, neither was Hurt Locker or Slumdog Millionaire. I really enjoyed Clooney's performance, but as you said, the plot is fairly average and not all that compelling for me at least. I haven't seen War Horse yet, but it seems tailor made for Speilberg to coast to the best picture nod.
I agree that Slumdog was vastly overrated and some of Boyle's least compelling work, but I disagree on The Hurt Locker. "Inaccuracies" aside, Bigelow's take on the war deserved its win against the field that particular year, especially considering how well it connected to ongoing events at the time of release. It is undeniably the best and most innovative war film of the past 5-10 years.
User avatar
Bootaaay
128-bit
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:31 am
Location: England

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Bootaaay »

I agree that Hurt Locker deserved to win compared to the rest of the films nominated, but I just didn't seem to enjoy it as much as others. The direction and cinematography were great, and some of the performances were commendable too, but I just didn't find the narrative all that compelling, especially once the main character's subordinates stopped harbouring ill-will towards him, nor did I care much for any of the characters outside of the lead.
Image
PSN; Bootaaay ---------------------------------------------------------------- XBL; B007444Y
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by BoringSupreez »

dsheinem wrote:
Bootaaay wrote:
dsheinem wrote:The Descendants (2011) – While I enjoyed this film and found the way in which it dealt with the subject matter at hand to be quite compelling, I am a little surprised it is getting as much Oscar buzz for best picture as it is. More melodrama than comedy, the standout work of this film is in the character acting, the cinematography, and the score – each of which I felt worked to prop up an otherwise fairly average plot. There are some cool moments in the film and it is nice to see Clooney at least a little bit outside of his comfort zone of the snarky, alpha-male, and /or quirky character. It was a fun one to watch with my wife and I recommend it, but it doesn’t feel like best picture material to me.
I definitely agree on this, it doesn't at all feel like best picture material - but then again, neither was Hurt Locker or Slumdog Millionaire. I really enjoyed Clooney's performance, but as you said, the plot is fairly average and not all that compelling for me at least. I haven't seen War Horse yet, but it seems tailor made for Speilberg to coast to the best picture nod.
I agree that Slumdog was vastly overrated and some of Boyle's least compelling work, but I disagree on The Hurt Locker. "Inaccuracies" aside, Bigelow's take on the war deserved its win against the field that particular year, especially considering how well it connected to ongoing events at the time of release. It is undeniably the best and most innovative war film of the past 5-10 years.
Nothing in the time slot you designated comes close to The Hurt Locker, really (since Black Hawk Down is now 11 years ago). Definitely my favorite war movie of recent years. I love how it refrained from getting all political. I think it was a better movie than Avatar, aka James Cameron's Pocahontas.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
PixelPunk
16-bit
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: MA
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by PixelPunk »

Watched this little gem last night. Godzilla King of the Monsters. Definitely not as good as some other 'Zilla movies but a fun watch none the less. Drinking beer while watching also makes it more enjoyable.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0197521/
User avatar
sabrage
Next-Gen
Posts: 2588
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:47 pm
Location: GMT -7

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by sabrage »

I really hope this doesn't turn in to a thread discussing the relative merits of the Academy Awards, considering that until recently they were co-produced by Brett fucking Ratner, and Brian Grazer isn't much better. :roll:

The last movie I watched was Marvin starring James Stewart. I thought it was a fantastic and uplifting film.
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Pulsar_t »

Bootaaay wrote:snip
Oh goody another commie-era Polish scifi flick for me to watch!! Thanks! :)

Btw, seen O-Bi, O-Ba - The End of Civilization (1985)? Highly recommended.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

sabrage wrote:I really hope this doesn't turn in to a thread discussing the relative merits of the Academy Awards, considering that until recently they were co-produced by Brett fucking Ratner, and Brian Grazer isn't much better. :roll:
Are you referring to the ceremony itself? It is certainly hit and miss most years, almost entirely depending on the host. Rattner was canned last year after some comments he made iirc. Grazer's filmography is hit and miss, so who knows what we'll get from him.

i care much less about the ceremony itself than the choices of nominees and eventual winners- the Oscars are still the highest honor in film every year and their picks are an excellent way to get a sense of the best of the medium in any given year. I know that the Academy doesn't usually pick the most popular films (OMGWTF DARK NIGHT IS TOTALLY BEST PIC EVAR!1!!), but they are usually pretty good at identifying the best films that push the medium, the best acting performances, the best writing, the best documentaries, etc. I don't always agree with who they pick as winners, but it is hard to argue too much with their selection of nominees when taken as a whole across multiple categories.
User avatar
sabrage
Next-Gen
Posts: 2588
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:47 pm
Location: GMT -7

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by sabrage »

dsheinem wrote:
sabrage wrote:I really hope this doesn't turn in to a thread discussing the relative merits of the Academy Awards, considering that until recently they were co-produced by Brett fucking Ratner, and Brian Grazer isn't much better. :roll:
i care much less about the ceremony itself than the choices of nominees and eventual winners- the Oscars are still the highest honor in film every year and their picks are an excellent way to get a sense of the best of the medium in any given year. I know that the Academy doesn't usually pick the most popular films (OMGWTF DARK NIGHT IS TOTALLY BEST PIC EVAR!1!!), but they are usually pretty good at identifying the best films that push the medium, the best acting performances, the best writing, the best documentaries, etc. I don't always agree with who they pick as winners, but it is hard to argue too much with their selection of nominees when taken as a whole across multiple categories.
Well, it's an awards show, the statues don't just get handed out in a vacuum. The circus they run every year definitely has an impact on its image.

But regarding the actual nominations, the fact that Refn got snubbed for Best Director tells me everything I need to know (Von Trier, too.)
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

sabrage wrote:
dsheinem wrote:
sabrage wrote:I really hope this doesn't turn in to a thread discussing the relative merits of the Academy Awards, considering that until recently they were co-produced by Brett fucking Ratner, and Brian Grazer isn't much better. :roll:
i care much less about the ceremony itself than the choices of nominees and eventual winners- the Oscars are still the highest honor in film every year and their picks are an excellent way to get a sense of the best of the medium in any given year. I know that the Academy doesn't usually pick the most popular films (OMGWTF DARK NIGHT IS TOTALLY BEST PIC EVAR!1!!), but they are usually pretty good at identifying the best films that push the medium, the best acting performances, the best writing, the best documentaries, etc. I don't always agree with who they pick as winners, but it is hard to argue too much with their selection of nominees when taken as a whole across multiple categories.
Well, it's an awards show, the statues don't just get handed out in a vacuum. The circus they run every year definitely has an impact on its image.

But regarding the actual nominations, the fact that Refn got snubbed for Best Director tells me everything I need to know (Von Trier, too.)
I haven't seen Drive or Melancholia, so I can't comment on those. Both are foreign directors, right? The Academy isn't usually real good at nominating int'l films or directors, so i don't hold them in much esteem there. For domestic stuff they are pretty good, though.
Post Reply