I always thought Zelda 2 was underrated. I liked the new style and somehow it just seemed cooler than the first. Plus, I felt like the game had a greater sense of wonder and mystery to it. It was hard as hell as a recall, but back then I had so much free time I never cared how hard a game was(not that I've got anything against hard games now). I especially loved the last boss fight. That was awesome. I always disliked how Link to the Past went back to the top down approach, though I think still think it was an amazing game. I just never feel like I'm completely a part of the action with top down view games, but I can still enjoy them if they're well designed.Mozgus wrote:I loves it too. It doesn't deserve smacktalk it gets.RyaNtheSlayA wrote:Yes and if I had to suggest one it would be Zelda 2. That one I actually played through and somewhat enjoyed it.
Ocarina of Time is when I started to have a problem with the Zelda games. Don't get me wrong, it was a fun game and I think the game's final act was simply incredible, but the game seemed small for a Zelda game. Plus, I couldn't stand that Link was a little kid. Maybe he always was in previous games, but I wasn't aware it. People are sitting back and letting some little kid save the world for them. WTF!?
I skipped Majora's Mask. I bought Wind Waker, played it for awhile and just lost interest. I didn't like all the sailing around and I hated the stealth gameplay in the first dungeon of the game. Twilight Princess brought me back to the series in earnest. I liked that Link was older and although I wasn't opposed to the visual style of Wind Waker, I preferred the more realistic approach. Overall, I liked Twilight Princess, though I think both Okami and Beyond Good and Evil have outclassed it in some ways. It spanks both of them though with its more complex dungeons and better boss fights