o.pwuaioc wrote:In my opinion, the PS2 is the jack of all trades, but master of none. Whatever it has, better can be found on another system. That's not to say what it has isn't good, just not top of the line.
Actually, I think the PS2 was unrivaled in the 3D Platformer genre that generation. Four good Ratchet and Clank games, three good Jak games, three good Sly games, Pac-man World 2, and Rayman 3.
Last edited by BoringSupreez on Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
o.pwuaioc wrote:In my opinion, the PS2 is the jack of all trades, but master of none. Whatever it has, better can be found on another system. That's not to say what it has isn't good, just not top of the line.
Actually, I think the PS2 was unrivaled in the 3D Platformer genre that generation. four good Ratchet and Clank games, three good Jak games, three good Sly games, Pac-man World 2, and Rayman 3.
Sure, maybe for it's generation, but I'm thinking overall.
noiseredux wrote:plus I can't think of any genre that I'd say the PS2 had a weak representation of in its library.
P&C adventure? WRPGs?
Of course it was weak in the P&C area. What console isn't, outside of failed early/mid 90's systems? As for WRPGs, those never really picked up outside of PC until this gen. So it has excuses.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
