360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Gaming on the Playstation and Xbox Platforms
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by DinnerX »

My fear is this: years from now when all the networks have gone down we'll be buying tons of duplicate consoles to get different games. I'll have the xbox2664 with bomberman 9000 and dragon warrior 786, the xbox2664 with braid 3 and so on. We'll be stuck hunting around for consoles and matching external hard drives with certain games on them.

This has already happened with the DLC of some oxbox titles. The only legal way to get the DLC is to find some random xbox with it and you still can't bring it all together on the same console.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by noiseredux »

pepharytheworm wrote:Alright, Noise, you like DLC. We get it. Enjoy you downloaded games. But please read peoples post again "You don't physically own a digital title" was stated not that you don't own it at all.

To the rest quit trying to convince him otherwise.
Oh, OK. I thought this was a forum where we discussed things. The funny thing is I personally prefer physical media, when it's available. I just don't seem to agree with the idea that you don't own digital media. I guess we have different definitions of ownership.

But bottomline -- you apparently don't want to see opinions other than yr own. So be it. I won't bother being a part of the discussion anymore.
Image
mjmjr25

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by mjmjr25 »

noiseredux wrote:
pepharytheworm wrote:Alright, Noise, you like DLC. We get it. Enjoy you downloaded games. But please read peoples post again "You don't physically own a digital title" was stated not that you don't own it at all.

To the rest quit trying to convince him otherwise.
Oh, OK. I thought this was a forum where we discussed things. The funny thing is I personally prefer physical media, when it's available. I just don't seem to agree with the idea that you don't own digital media. I guess we have different definitions of ownership.

But bottomline -- you apparently don't want to see opinions other than yr own. So be it. I won't bother being a part of the discussion anymore.
Of course you own it. I prefer physical as well, but the notion that you don't own the the download is silly.

You may own a physical copy of Super Tecmo Bowl, but you don't own "Super Tecmo Bowl" and all of its proprietary rights, et al. I may own a download of Super Tecmo Bowl, and of course I don't own "Super Tecmo Bowl". This is basic stuff.
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by pepharytheworm »

noiseredux wrote:But bottomline -- you apparently don't want to see opinions other than yr own.
I don't remember saying my personal views on DLC and its future. I don't mind discussions, but not when they become circular arguements. Discussions move forward. The truth is I see both sides. But this is a discussion about 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms and both systems do have enough games that aren't DLC to see some future retro in both platforms, so lets bring this topic back to that.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by DinnerX »

mjmjr25 wrote: Of course you own it. I prefer physical as well, but the notion that you don't own the the download is silly.

You may own a physical copy of Super Tecmo Bowl, but you don't own "Super Tecmo Bowl" and all of its proprietary rights, et al. I may own a download of Super Tecmo Bowl, and of course I don't own "Super Tecmo Bowl". This is basic stuff.
I agree with this.

My problem isn't about owning the download though. It's that I don't like the restrictions and consequences of the format. I own the download, but I don't view it as owning much. :| I suppose companies would tell us any game is just licensed to us anyway...but I still can't do as much with a download.

Uh...on topic, it's weird to think that the ps3 and 360 will be retro to to the next generation of kids. I suppose for them the hd games of today will look like pong does to me.

I feel old just thinking about it. :lol:
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by CD AGES »

My problem isn't about owning the download though. It's that I don't like the restrictions and consequences of the format. I own the download, but I don't view it as owning much. I suppose companies would tell us any game is just licensed to us anyway...but I still can't do as much with a download.
Indeed!
User avatar
t0yrobo
Next-Gen
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:19 pm
Location: GR MI

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by t0yrobo »

I'm not sure if I really understand the discussion here.
When the current consoles lose their online support we'll lose access to all the dlc, I get that.
If you get a new system because an old one dies, your hd dies etc. you won't be able to re download your dlc. Ok
You don't physically own anything that's dlc, and there's nothing physical to own anyways. Yup
It is already possible to get dlc etc. through the shadier parts of the internet. Yup, it sure it

I don't mean to be a dick, but the solution to all this is blatantly obvious. Hack your console and get the dlc (like I mentioned back on page 3 :wink:). There's nothing to lose since the online service is down, and there's no other options with the exception of the games that have on disc dlc. Dlc has no aftermarket, that's just how it is. If you feel better only torrenting games you bought while the service was active that's fine, but there won't be any other reasonable option.
ninjainspandex
Next-Gen
Posts: 4574
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: Hartland Wisconsin

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by ninjainspandex »

look at it this way DLC games are often games that wouldnt get a disk release so you wouldnt of gotten to play it without it.
Image
Flake
Moderator
Posts: 8075
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:27 pm
Location: FoCo

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by Flake »

I would not worry about the DLC equation.

Enough gamers are worried about this that I believe we will see a service akin to Mame developed in the future, where cracked copies of popular DLC games will be playable on PC with a growing library as more games are cracked or optimized to be played through the client.
Maybe now Nintendo will acknowledge Metroid has a fanbase?
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: 360 vs PS3 as future retro platforms...

Post by DinnerX »

Flake wrote:I would not worry about the DLC equation.

Enough gamers are worried about this that I believe we will see a service akin to Mame developed in the future, where cracked copies of popular DLC games will be playable on PC with a growing library as more games are cracked or optimized to be played through the client.
I'm that guy who doesn't use MAME as well.

Personally, I think it's unsatisfactory that the only realistic, complete solution to the problem will be illegal. But that's me. :wink:
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Post Reply