yeah I thought it was ace too - though a bit too aggressive in it's self righteous 'science over religion' bits (and trust me I'm not religious, but it just seemed a bit arrogant to me).fastbilly1 wrote:Paul - it was a great Simon Pegg/Nick Frost buddy comedy. It had some parts I did not like (the Bible thumping redneck was overkill), but on the whole it was a good run. The bar scene made me laugh so hard we had to stop the film.
Will do, but since it is in the Criterion Collection, I'm going to make an assumption and that it's probably going to be pretty great, or at least interesting.Stark wrote:^ That looks creepy, let us know how it is.
I've watched a few movies strictly because they're in the CC, and my favorite so far was Ikiru by Kurosawa. Very moving stuff.Luke wrote:Will do, but since it is in the Criterion Collection, I'm going to make an assumption and that it's probably going to be pretty great, or at least interesting.Stark wrote:^ That looks creepy, let us know how it is.
Ehem...Luke wrote:Will do, but since it is in the Criterion Collection, I'm going to make an assumption and that it's probably going to be pretty great, or at least interesting.
The big problem is that Pasolini was an intellectual and he made Salo as a very metaphoric film about fascism and politics. It isn't, the shit eating scene is apparently symbolizing mass produced foods, yeah... it's bullshit (Pun intended).elmagicochrisg wrote:How can you not like movies that have people eating poopoo or cutting of genitals in them?...
Why the "yikes"?noiseredux wrote:lol @ Salo.
...yikes.
Antichrist is a horrible piece of shit. Honestly one of the worst movies I've ever sat through. I'm fairly certain Von Trier is a total moron.KillerJuan77 wrote: Antichrist suffers from almost the exact same problem plus it adds the typical layer of pretentiousness and "hipster-ness" that Von Trier loves to add. Also, it's not scary, disturbing or even sad, it's fucking retarded, I nearly laughed my ass off with the fox and masturbation scene.
