I'm not sure what Hobie thinks, but I hated the fact that 28 days really wasn't much of a zombie movie. There were like 4 parts that had zombies, and the rest was pretty much all boring.Hobie-wan wrote:28 Days Later wasn't serious enough for you?saturnfan wrote:Despite the zombie fad, there hasn't been a good "serious" zombie movie since like the 80s. They are all spoofs, not violent enough or goofy in some way. AMC's Walking Dead has been decent enough though.
I personally feel the movies are getting to far away from the survival aspect. For example, all of the George A. Movies other than Night of the Living Dead and Dawn of the Dead (Original) are too goofy and try to be 'progressive' for zombies or something. What we need is a good zombie movie, just about killing zombies and living.
Personally, I don't mind this fad, because it isn't really all that in your face like the vampire fad. But that might just be me. Plus, vampires have been ruined for me. I get vampires being seductive and stuff, but they shouldn't be super strong, super fast, and all that good looking. That's why I liked Dracula and Nosferatu, but this new stuff sucks. And werewolves? WTF happened to half human half wolf monsters that destroy people and eat them? A big wolf isn't scary, one well placed shot takes that shit out.
