Windows 8
- Erik_Twice
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 6251
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
- Location: Madrid, Spain
Re: Windows 8
I'm still rocking XP. Upgrading is for the weak of hardware =p
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
-
fastbilly1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13775
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm
Re: Windows 8
The only flaw in this is that, apart from the ME to XP shift, all the other superior versions have been based on the same kernel. This could be like Windows 2000, the epitome of the NT 3 kernel. NT 3 < NT 3.5 < NT 4 < Windows 2000CRTGAMER wrote: Windows 3.1 < Windows 3.11 Workgroups
Windows 95 < Windows 98
Windows Millennium < Windows XP
Windows Vista < Windows 7
Windows 8 < ?
Most people have an XP box or two still - I have six at last count. I would have ten if I got more psus.General_Norris wrote:I'm still rocking XP. Upgrading is for the weak of hardware =p
Re: Windows 8
Unless your data is the attack vector. Acrobat PDFs and Word DOCs can both contain exploits. Nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure.isiolia wrote:Windows 8 also has a "return to stock" option that leaves data in place. So hopefully that'll be a viable way for people to fix their own malware problems (but probably not, considering how many block .exes from running).
We are prepared to live in the plain and die in the plain!
-
RyaNtheSlayA
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9201
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
- Location: Denver CO, USA
Re: Windows 8
That logic is broken by Windows 2000, which was awesome.CRTGAMER wrote:@ Inazuma - You do have a lot of insight, but no need for all the cursing to get a point across. I do agree that Win 8 will be the beta of a more stable fix later. That said, here is a look at Windows history.ZenErik wrote:But Inazuma needs to bitch about everything. Providing simple solutions just isn't right! Just isn't right, man. *sigh*
Windows 3.1 < Windows 3.11 Workgroups
Windows 95 < Windows 98
Windows Millennium < Windows XP
Windows Vista < Windows 7
Windows 8 < ?
Older. Not wiser.
Re: Windows 8
Wasn't 2K not intended to be a home release? Even though plenty of people used it for home PCs. But also, 98 SE.
I think the internet is confusing Windows releases with Star Trek movie releases. The only bad version of the Windows OS in my eyes was ME. People can suck it, Vista was fine. Not problematic like the internet made it out to be. These people should be forced to use ME so they know what they're talking about. That, and learn how to A) Not buy cheap computers loaded with crapware and B) How to properly use and maintain a computer.
Anyways, there's no reason to believe that Win8 will suck following some sort of pattern.
I think the internet is confusing Windows releases with Star Trek movie releases. The only bad version of the Windows OS in my eyes was ME. People can suck it, Vista was fine. Not problematic like the internet made it out to be. These people should be forced to use ME so they know what they're talking about. That, and learn how to A) Not buy cheap computers loaded with crapware and B) How to properly use and maintain a computer.
Anyways, there's no reason to believe that Win8 will suck following some sort of pattern.
-
fastbilly1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13775
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm
Re: Windows 8
Vista was fine after SP1. It liked to Blue Screen if I had my Palm Pilot connected pre SP1.Ziggy587 wrote:Vista was fine
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Windows 8
Yes it was, early on and right out of the box. A few patches and changed options later, it's even better than XP. I still use Vista on my main gaming machine. Also, I've never understood Windows 2000 love. I always found 98 SE to be a better OS for gaming.Ziggy587 wrote:Wasn't 2K not intended to be a home release? Even though plenty of people used it for home PCs. But also, 98 SE.
I think the internet is confusing Windows releases with Star Trek movie releases. The only bad version of the Windows OS in my eyes was ME. People can suck it, Vista was fine. Not problematic like the internet made it out to be. These people should be forced to use ME so they know what they're talking about. That, and learn how to A) Not buy cheap computers loaded with crapware and B) How to properly use and maintain a computer.
Anyways, there's no reason to believe that Win8 will suck following some sort of pattern.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: Windows 8
Good to see some feedback on the //build/ preview. As part of the disclaimer, I work for Microsoft, so my feedback may be heavily bias, but I'll try to be fair 
Windows 8 builds are tested here on Dell Netbooks to test the lowest possible hardware requirements. It is noted that the OS runs fine on a single core Atom with 1GB ram.

For those that have played with the new preview, how much time do you spend playing with the Metro Desktop vs the Classic "Windows 7' desktop?
As Ballmer hinted earlier this year, there is a high probablity of a Kinect devkit on it's way for PC. There is no confirmation on this, but with the way that Xbox 360 is trying to make the dashboard more Kinect-centric, I can only imagine that there are plans to try to use the same input with a HTPC.fastbilly1 wrote:That and I think it will make a dynamite HTPC OS if you use a Wiimote for controls.
We are going to see how well my EEE900 can handle Win8...
Windows 8 builds are tested here on Dell Netbooks to test the lowest possible hardware requirements. It is noted that the OS runs fine on a single core Atom with 1GB ram.
There are Tablet PCs on the market now, and they work rather well with the current developer preview. It's exciting to see what type of applications are being created for the touch-centric UI. At this point, it is no longer a OS restriction, as Windows 8 is similar to Windows 7 with a touch-UI upgrade, but rather on how developers are able to create usable touch applications without sacraficing functionality within the new OS.ZenErik wrote:Im looking forward to Windows 8 for a tablet with a full OS. IPad is too limited for my tastes. Windows 8 will lead to tablets that can be true laptop replacements.
Yes, I personally feel that the UAC is a reminder for those that aren't well educated on security and common PC practice. As part of my fresh installs, one of the first things I do is disable UAC, normally even before running Windows updatefastbilly1 wrote: You could disable UAC or set an exception for it: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/135472- ... uac-part2/
It should be easier, but the option is there. Personally I have the UAC set at low.
For those that have played with the new preview, how much time do you spend playing with the Metro Desktop vs the Classic "Windows 7' desktop?
If you aren't having a good time, why are you playing?
Re: Windows 8
Thanks for the help with the Winamp permission problem I'm having. I will try some of those solutions later today. (^_^)
Re: Windows 8
UAC is there to warn you if a program tries to take more permissions than you have given it. If you're trusting programs not to alter your system files, you aren't well educated on security and common PC practice.avrame wrote:Yes, I personally feel that the UAC is a reminder for those that aren't well educated on security and common PC practice. As part of my fresh installs, one of the first things I do is disable UAC, normally even before running Windows update
We are prepared to live in the plain and die in the plain!