I think messageboard posts about "noobs" not being hardcore enough should probably just stay behind when the next gen rolls around.BoringSupreez wrote: I know I wouldn't have got into videogaming if my first game had been Starcraft instead of Putt-Putt Joins the Parade. Real videogames are often too overwhelming for noobs to enjoy.
What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
- noiseredux
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 38148
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
-
Gamerforlife
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 10184
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
Bloody screens are a bit silly, but they did a variation of this in Peter Jackson's King Kong that I liked. You take a hit in that game and if it doesn't outright kill you, your vision blurs, the sound gets a bit muted and you can just barely hear the NPC characters screaming your name and freaking out. It worked well because it felt realistic rather than gimmicky. You get attacked by a freaking dinosaur and you're going to get disoriented and you're going to be knocking on death's door and I felt the game portrayed that wellCFFJR wrote:Agreed, agreed! Thank you!hashiriya1 wrote:No more bloody screens, thank you. Bloody as in blood, not the British slang term.
I'm so sick of the bloody screen. I don't know if the idea is to be more realistic or just to clean up the hud, but I do know that its god damn annoying.
Just give me a freaking health bar. It doesn't have to be big. Even a tiny little percentage in the corner of the screen would be fine.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
By "noob" I just meant someone new to games. I didn't mean it in an insulting way. Basically, I was using noob's original meaning, which used to mean someone who is new to something, rather than someone who is stupid or not "hardcore." Everyone here was a gaming noob once.noiseredux wrote:I think messageboard posts about "noobs" not being hardcore enough should probably just stay behind when the next gen rolls around.BoringSupreez wrote: I know I wouldn't have got into videogaming if my first game had been Starcraft instead of Putt-Putt Joins the Parade. Real videogames are often too overwhelming for noobs to enjoy.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
Man, I've been pro since birth.BoringSupreez wrote:Everyone here was a gaming noob once.
GameSack wrote:That's right, only Sega had the skill to make a proper Nintendo game.
- noiseredux
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 38148
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
By "noob" I just meant someone new to games. I didn't mean it in an insulting way. Basically, I was using noob's original meaning, which used to mean someone who is new to something, rather than someone who is stupid or not "hardcore." Everyone here was a gaming noob once.[/quote]BoringSupreez wrote: I think messageboard posts about "noobs" not being hardcore enough should probably just stay behind when the next gen rolls around.
I actually think I read your post backwards -- you were saying you were GLAD that you played the "casual" game before the "hardcore" game? I misunderstood that. Gotcha now.
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
Maybe I'm off, but I was always under the impression that the spelling when you intended that meaning was "newb", whereas "noob" is the derogatory spelling.BoringSupreez wrote: By "noob" I just meant someone new to games. I didn't mean it in an insulting way. Basically, I was using noob's original meaning, which used to mean someone who is new to something, rather than someone who is stupid or not "hardcore." Everyone here was a gaming noob once.
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
I felt there were not enough console exclusives, particularly between Xbox and PS3. I would like to see those two systems have more unique content in their eventual new systems.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
It's not that the PS3 lacks exclusives, it's that the 360 does. I've had both, so I'm speaking from experience here.saturnfan wrote:I felt there were not enough console exclusives, particularly between Xbox and PS3. I would like to see those two systems have more unique content in their eventual new systems.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
BoringSupreez wrote:It's not that the PS3 lacks exclusives, it's that the 360 does. I've had both, so I'm speaking from experience here.saturnfan wrote:I felt there were not enough console exclusives, particularly between Xbox and PS3. I would like to see those two systems have more unique content in their eventual new systems.
It's not that the 360 lacks exclusives, it is that it lacks good exclusives. This is coming from someone who owns both. Other than Gears, Halo and some shmups, there isn't much that interests me.
Sale thread (please buy!): http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=19428
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: What should developers NOT continue doing after this gen?
Well, good exclusives are the only ones I care at all about, so same dif.swiftzx wrote:BoringSupreez wrote:It's not that the PS3 lacks exclusives, it's that the 360 does. I've had both, so I'm speaking from experience here.saturnfan wrote:I felt there were not enough console exclusives, particularly between Xbox and PS3. I would like to see those two systems have more unique content in their eventual new systems.
It's not that the 360 lacks exclusives, it is that it lacks good exclusives. This is coming from someone who owns both. Other than Gears, Halo and some shmups, there isn't much that interests me.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
