Hackers on the run it seems

[KillerJuan77]

Why would anyone defend this group? They do not represent the entirety.

Because apparently hacking people to proof that security systems aren't good is OK just like it's OK to kill someone using a hazmat suit and gloves to proof that the police can't investigate well planned crimes without evidence.

[jeffro11]

Were weren't praising groups like them. However there ARE groups out there that do good, if you will. Labeling them all as the same is asinine and short sighted. Wishing people death is about as obscene as you can get however.

Because apparently hacking people to proof that security systems aren't good is OK just like it's OK to kill someone using a hazmat suit and gloves to proof that the police can't investigate well planned crimes without evidence.

You can't even begin to compare the two. If you can't realize this you need to get a firm grasp on reality.

[KillerJuan77]

Were weren't praising groups like them. However there ARE groups out there that do good, if you will. Labeling them all as the same is asinine and short sighted. Wishing people death is about as obscene as you can get however.

Because apparently hacking people to proof that security systems aren't good is OK just like it's OK to kill someone using a hazmat suit and gloves to proof that the police can't investigate well planned crimes without evidence.

You can't even begin to compare the two. If you can't realize this you need to get a firm grasp on reality.

It was an exaggerated comment and besides, that's basically the idea of LulzSec, hacking websites and posting personal info to proof that online security isn't good. In few overcomplicated words "Causing/doing X to proof why X can happen on Y"

[dsheinem]

I am locking this because we already have several threads dealing with Lulzsec and the like. They've turned into flamebait and this one is heading that way.

Oh, I mean I am locking this because ALLZ HACKERZ R00L!!1!