brunoafh wrote:Ivo wrote:The important distinction is the nice guys may have chosen to be what they are, but they did not choose to enforce the specific nasty laws (some of them which indeed exist). That is just an unpleasant part of their job (hopefully a small part of it).
This part doesn't make any sense. You can't just be like "well, I only became a cop for the good laws". It all goes hand in hand.
I disagree, I think it makes perfect sense. I can easily imagine someone becoming a cop because he wants to help people. Certainly there is the likelihood that they will have -as part of the job - to do some other ethically grey things. That does not invalidate their motivation from becoming a cop from being "to help people".
Hatta wrote:Yes, if you knowingly take a job where you're going to have to hurt people, that's your responsibility. "I was just doing my job" is not an excuse. That has been abundantly clear for at least 66 years now.
I disagree. If the person's motivation for becoming a cop was genuinely good, then "I was just doing my job" when some nastier parts show up is a perfectly valid "excuse" in my opinion. I'm not criticising the ones that will put others interests ahead of their own interests and do stuff like disobeying superior orders - those are often genuine heroes on top of being nice people. Does not necessarily mean that those that do not disobey said orders are bad people, it will depend on what the orders are and the context and stuff.
A couple of important distinctions is whether the cop enjoys or minds doing the ethically grey stuff. Some of the nasty ones actually enjoy it (I think most if not all riot control cops are of that type, for example - I think they like beating people up). The good ones that don't like that kind of stuff, when it happens that they have to do it will go home thinking "Sometimes I hate my job", but hopefully that is not every single day.
Ivo.