irixith wrote:
Really the proper question is: Why not?

From the developer point of view (even if they may not admit it)? Because it may actually lose them sales and it is extra development time.
Check some reactions to Dragon Age 2 (I think that is the correct game, I haven't played it but I read some bits about this in Penny Arcade).
On a less cynical note, I am in favour of diversity, but one has to admit that when you transfer the majority in the real world to a virtual representation, it is quite acceptable and understandable that in a reduced population of Characters with actual character development (including NPCs) there is not enough space to showcase all minorities.
In real life you don't go around and always know if person X is this or that and that is even when you interact in quite different ways from what you usually see in games.
Most characters in a given game simply have no defined sexual preference, so it is not surprising that those few who do happen to have the majority preference.
Maybe you can just feel free to project a desired sexual preference into those who do not have it defined?
I agree that it should be positive to have more diversity going forward to have once in a while you see that kind of difference as well.
However, I don't think games should strive for a "Power Rangers" where you have 5 or 6 of them and there are "token" representatives of this and that.
Personally I didn't care either way for the theme of LSQFM (honestly I never got why lesbians are automatically a "plus" for many men!). The plot is ridiculous and over the top. The gameplay is very good and that is really what counts.
Ivo.