Perhaps not, but they are pretty good at it when their game's strongest part is the story (see Deus Ex and Star Wars KotoR (Lucas I forgive your personal stupidity and mediocre movie franchise, only cause it gave birth to this gem)AppleQueso wrote:are you implying that western game companies are any more competent at storytelling?
Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
-
AppleQueso
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
God prequels look what you did, dragged two and a half excellent films through the mud.ZeroAX wrote:Perhaps not, but they are pretty good at it when their game's strongest part is the story (see Deus Ex and Star Wars KotoR (Lucas I forgive your personal stupidity and mediocre movie franchise, only cause it gave birth to this gem)AppleQueso wrote:are you implying that western game companies are any more competent at storytelling?
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
To be honest other than the Empire Strikes Back, and an excellent sound track, I still think the Star Wars movies aren't anything to boast about. The story is stolen (Lucas said so himself that he took parts from many sources and put them together), and the constant CGI edits cheapen it.AppleQueso wrote: God prequels look what you did, dragged two and a half excellent films through the mud.
I still believe the struggle between the Light and the Dark is a wonderful idea, which was portrayed wonderfully in the Empire Strikes Back, but the conclusion in Return of the Jedi was quite underwhelming. You can not choose the Light and not lose something, cause being good always comes with sacrifice, otherwise what's the point of the Dark?
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
-
AppleQueso
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
When I say "two and a half", it's probably pretty obvious which two I mean I think. (the original film and ESB, with ESB being the better of the two obviously). ROTJ was underwhelming, for a variety of reasons. Gary Kurtz actually parted ways with Lucas because he didn't agree with the direction that Lucas wanted ROTJ's story to go in. Kurtz wanted stuff like Han Solo making a heroic sacrifice for example.ZeroAX wrote:To be honest other than the Empire Strikes Back, and an excellent sound track, I still think the Star Wars movies aren't anything to boast about. The story is stolen (Lucas said so himself that he took parts from many sources and put them together), and the constant CGI edits cheapen it.AppleQueso wrote: God prequels look what you did, dragged two and a half excellent films through the mud.
I still believe the struggle between the Light and the Dark is a wonderful idea, which was portrayed wonderfully in the Empire Strikes Back, but the conclusion in Return of the Jedi was quite underwhelming. You can not choose the Light and not lose something, cause being good always comes with sacrifice, otherwise what's the point of the Dark?
As for the story being "stolen", I don't know, it's true that it's just a bunch of archetypes from mythology and whatnot, based mostly on the monomyth idea, and he was always pretty honest about it (until recently at least), so I don't know if it's accurate to say it was stolen.
And as for the CGI edits, the dumbest thing about that is that they not only added CG that doesn't fit very well, they didn't even fix most of the errors in the actual original effects shots, and of the few they did fix, they didn't even fix them right (see the SE of the first film, where luke's lightsaber is green for an entire scene when it's blue everywhere else in the film.)
-
GazongaJoe
- 24-bit
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:10 pm
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
Well, since it's bumped already, probably something like this.
IV
V
VI
III
IX
I
VII
II
VIII
IV
V
VI
III
IX
I
VII
II
VIII
Last edited by o.pwuaioc on Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
AppleQueso
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
You hate VII so much you listed it twiceo.pwuaioc wrote:Well, since it's bumped already, probably something like this.
IV
V
VI
III
IX
I
VII
II
VII
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
Oops, fixed.AppleQueso wrote:You hate VII so much you listed it twiceo.pwuaioc wrote:Well, since it's bumped already, probably something like this.
IV
V
VI
III
IX
I
VII
II
VII
Really, they can be divided into two categories.
Good: I, III, IV, V, VI, IX
Not so good: II, VII, VIII
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
1.VII(the one I started with
)
2,VIII
3.III
4.X
5.IX
Haven't gotten to sink enough hours in to really have an opinion on these. Need to do a play through of the whole series sometime
. Have all the PS1 ports as well as a few on PSP/DS.
6.IV
7.I
8.II
9.V
10. VI
2,VIII
3.III
4.X
5.IX
Haven't gotten to sink enough hours in to really have an opinion on these. Need to do a play through of the whole series sometime
6.IV
7.I
8.II
9.V
10. VI
- dunpeal2064
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:55 pm
- Location: Central Valley, California
- Contact:
Re: Rank the first 10 Final Fantasy games
Eh, why not.
VII
X
VI
IX
XIII
V
IV
VIII
XII
I
II
I figure there is no reason to exclude XII/XIII if X is included. If we were just doing traditional FF games, I would cut it off at IX personally.
I have not played III.
Out of that entire list, I have cleared and thoroughly enjoyed each entry... except II. I thought that game was miserable. I'm sure I'll try to tackle it again at some point.
I have a hard time choosing between VI and X, as I find them both to be excellent... in fact, I would say they are both technically better than VII.
VII
X
VI
IX
XIII
V
IV
VIII
XII
I
II
I figure there is no reason to exclude XII/XIII if X is included. If we were just doing traditional FF games, I would cut it off at IX personally.
I have not played III.
Out of that entire list, I have cleared and thoroughly enjoyed each entry... except II. I thought that game was miserable. I'm sure I'll try to tackle it again at some point.
I have a hard time choosing between VI and X, as I find them both to be excellent... in fact, I would say they are both technically better than VII.
