I don't believe in honoring the war dead of an army that's committed atrocities to the extent that the Imperial Army did. If you're going to honor their Pearl Harbor dead, then why not also the ones that died in connection with Imperial Army atrocities like the Rape of Nanking? I'm sure some Chinese civilian got a lucky shot or stab in and killed one. If I didn't make that explicitly clear, then mea culpa, my friend.hashiriya1 wrote:Oh, Nanking is in Pearl Harbor? I thought it was in China. I thought this thread was about Pearl Harbor. I must have misread the title.dedalusdedalus wrote:Let's also not forget the Rape of Nanking and the Bataan Death March. Great bunch of boys those were on the other side.hashiriya1 wrote:Let's not forget that boys on the other side lost their lives on that day because of a power-hungry war mongering savage who brainwashed his subordinates and deceived his emperor.
I'm not trying to make an ad hominem attack against you or anything, but if you're bringing up your family anecdote to show that you somehow have a greater claim to this history and a greater right to forgive the Imperial Army, then it's a wash. My grandparents fought against the Imperial Army, and they're a lot less forgiving than yours are.
Either way, I'm afraid you and I are just going to have to agree to disagree, but I just wanted to state a dissenting opinion on these boards.
Admirable sentiment.ZeroAX wrote:I'd probably pick neither. Better to live as a free man for an hour than a slave for 40 years as we say.dedalusdedalus wrote: Tell me with a straight face that if you were a solider in WWII, that you'd rather surrender to the Japanese than the Americans.
However, just for your information, approximately 100% of people who don't dodge hypothetical questions would choose to be a POW with the Americans rather than the Japanese.
