TheTrueVeteranGamer wrote:http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox/472132 ... index.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox/562116 ... index.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/926 ... index.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/960 ... index.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/954 ... index.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/935 ... index.html
I have to say that you have to be a total idiot/fanboy to believe they deserve the scores they've gotten.
Halo: CE was a competent but unremarkable shooter with a forgettable soundtrack. It should've gotten scores of 8s or 7s or 6s
Halo 2 was slightly better, but it was more of the same. It should've gotten 7s or 6s or 5s
Halo 3 is one of the worst FPS of this gen, even worse than the last two. It should've gotten scores of 5s or 4s or even 3s.
Halo 3 ODST was a painful experience, and an over-priced piece of shit. It should have gotten 2s or 3s.
Halo Wars was abysmal, that is all.
Reach was better than 3, but it was average at best. It deserved scores of 6s or 5s.
It quite clear to anyone who has good taste or mid to high standards to video games, that reviewers were obviously bribed by M$ to get such undeserved high scores.
TROLLLLLLLLLL!!!!! You seem like a douche, too. But I guess that kind of goes hand-in-hand with being a troll. Troll.







