And now's the time, the time is now, to sing my songZiggy587 wrote:I'm kinda just rambling on.
Apple>Microsoft
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Mac and Linux don't have many viruses because most people use Windows. Linux just isn't designed for the average user, while Mac is far outside most people's budget for a computer.
-
puke_face
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Also, if you don't run a anti virus program regularly, Malwarebytes.org has a pretty good malicious content scanner. I use Norton Antivirus, and Malwarebytes tends to pick up what Norton left behind.
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Thanks for the advice, but I have eliminated any unnecessary program, and set most things to not turn on when the computer boots up. And, every Saturday night, my computer runs all all the maintenance things (like defraging), so I'm sure its not that.Ziggy587 wrote:lotsa stuff
I use some Vorizon Macafee thing for my anti-virus (whenever you use it).
My Sale thread, lots of nintendo, neo-geo, and sega stuff!Ack wrote:You WILL be respectful of each other, or I WILL shove my mod foot so far up your Internet ass that your avatar will wince. Do you understand, children?
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 73#p305373
Re: Apple>Microsoft
McAfee is a disaster!
Maybe it's to blame for screwing up the svchost process on your laptop (normally this is the one that consumes most CPU time when there's something wrong)
Just use AVG as previously mentioned, or Avast.. (I tend to shuffle between 2-3 AV programs each year)
Just use AVG as previously mentioned, or Avast.. (I tend to shuffle between 2-3 AV programs each year)
Thy ban hammer shalt strike 

-
RyaNtheSlayA
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9201
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
- Location: Denver CO, USA
Re: Apple>Microsoft
As far as virus protection I just use Microsoft security essentials, works suprisingly well, is free, and has kept my computer free of Trojans, viruses, etc.
Older. Not wiser.
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Worse then Spyware, my older response to Norton.samsonlonghair wrote:Here's a funny anecdote. I do computer repair and maintenance at several county government offices. The county requires that all their computers have Norton AV. [Don't get me started on how awful Norton is.] Several offices use Macs, and sure enough the county requires that they run Norton AV too. I tried telling the county that they were wasting money, but it doesn't matter. It turns out that government offices are much better at wasting taxpayers' money than making informed decisions.
And yes, Norton does make an Antivirus for OSX. link. As far as I can tell, all it does is waste system resources.
Norton is especially bad. My neighbor after a month of using it finally uninstalled it. Worse then a virus, anytime he did anything Norton would pop up with a warning "Click to continue".
Its Back again! Norton Security "Is it Safe? Press okay to continue ..........."

On my PC, I'll stick with Spybot, its free with consistent updates.
Agree, as for the Mac don't need any.
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425
-
lisalover1
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 4960
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: Redmond, WA
- Contact:
Re: Apple>Microsoft
Didn't you hear? Apple stopped making them a while ago; they announced there will be no more of them.Jrecee wrote:Has anyone else noticed there haven't been any mac vs pc ads in a while?
Re: Apple>Microsoft
I use Spybot, but I would never use it exclusively. I like it a lot, and I think it has a great scanner, but I was reading a few reviews that claim the real time watcher (Tea Timer?) isn't too good. I really like the immunize feature though, I don't know how well it actually works but it's a great idea. In fact, why don't other anti-virue/malware programs have an immunize feature?CRTGAMER wrote:On my PC, I'll stick with Spybot, its free with consistent updates.
What's more, no ONE anti-virus or malware program means 100% total complete protection. Spybot will catch things that AVG wont, AVG will catch things that Spybot wont, Norton will catch things that AVG and Spybot wont, etc, etc.
I'm not saying that people should run multiple anti-virus programs, especially since running multiple anit-virus programs that have live detection seem to have negetive effects, but people should have an anti-virus AND anti-malware scanner (because they're not the same thing).
As I said earlier in this thread, I run AVG Free (anti-virus) and have been considering buying Malwarebytes (anti-malware). I also have Spybot installed and use the immunize feature. I'll scan with Spybot every so often as extra precaution. I guess I also have Windows Defender running too. Seems like a lot, I guess.
Now what's the difference between Windows Defender and Security Essentials?RyaNtheSlayA wrote:As far as virus protection I just use Microsoft security essentials, works suprisingly well, is free, and has kept my computer free of Trojans, viruses, etc.
