I was watching an episode of the old TV show "Unsolved Mysteries". In the show, a couple answered a classified ad for a variety of Macintosh computer that cost $31,000. The year this took place was 1992. The computer had 32 MB of RAM and a 124 MB hard drive.
My teacher at school showed me an old Silicon Graphics O2 work station a former coworker of hers had given her. I leafed through the instruction manual to discover it had 32 MB of RAM and a 200 mhz processor. It cost $8000 in 1998.
Today I play a custom firmware PSP with a 300 mhz processor, 32 MB of RAM, and a 4 GB flash stick with emulators and music on it. I spent the equivalent of $70 or so for it.
This is bloody awesome.
We're all playing supercomputers
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
That's the way computers (and most electronics) work. They get smaller, faster and cheaper.
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
Yep and in 10 years time when we look back at our quad core 3.6GHz systems with 4 GB ram and 2 TB hard drive space. We will laugh that we paid £500 for all of that when £250 will get all that on a device no bigger than todays mobile phones.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
Silicon in its physical form is among the worst investments ever, unless you do productive work using it of course. A videocard you buy today for $500 is going to be worth a tenth of its retail price a few years down the road.
Stiff competition in the CPU market, the Information Superhighway and yes even Windows contributed a lot to making computing affordable for the masses. The sad thing, most of this computing power is gone to waste anyhow. I love the concept behind Folding@home but it's not enough to overcome the wasted potential.
Stiff competition in the CPU market, the Information Superhighway and yes even Windows contributed a lot to making computing affordable for the masses. The sad thing, most of this computing power is gone to waste anyhow. I love the concept behind Folding@home but it's not enough to overcome the wasted potential.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike 

Re: We're all playing supercomputers
I hope you're right, but I'm becoming pretty pessimistic about Moore's law holding too much longer.Niode wrote:Yep and in 10 years time when we look back at our quad core 3.6GHz systems with 4 GB ram and 2 TB hard drive space. We will laugh that we paid £500 for all of that when £250 will get all that on a device no bigger than todays mobile phones.
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii
- noiseredux
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 38148
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
I wouldn't mind short lulls in technological advancement every now and then. For the first time in history humanity is playing catch-up with its own inventions.Limewater wrote:I hope you're right, but I'm becoming pretty pessimistic about Moore's law holding too much longer.Niode wrote:Yep and in 10 years time when we look back at our quad core 3.6GHz systems with 4 GB ram and 2 TB hard drive space. We will laugh that we paid £500 for all of that when £250 will get all that on a device no bigger than todays mobile phones.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike 

- s1mplehumar
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5143
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 2:26 pm
- Location: Ragol (FORREST 1)
- Contact:
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
Robert Stack is the man.noiseredux wrote:I own all the Unsolved Mysteries boxsets. Just saying...
Nintendo ID, PSN, XBL: Eronnicus * Steam ID: s1mplehumar * Switch Friend Code: SW-3270-7921-5525
Re: We're all playing supercomputers
I have to admit what made me post a topic about this was reading the article about "scariest unsolved mysteries episodes" on X-entertainment. XD

