hmmm...news to me - source?Limewater wrote:One problem (and this may relate to the difference in unemployment between the U.S. and Brazil, though I'm not certain), is that we've changed the way we calculate unemployment over the years. I believe current methods only count people actively seeking employment, not those who have given up.dsheinem wrote:
http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
1992 - 7.5
1984-86 - >7
1983 - 9.6
1982 - 9.7
1980 - 7.1
1981 - 7.6
1976 - 7.7
1975 - 8.5
1961 - 6.7
1958 - 6.8
Maybe I'm just reading the wrong propaganda, but I believe our unemployment numbers today are artificially lower than they would have been if measured in the 1920's, for example.
Animated unemployment map
Re: Animated unemployment map
-
zarathstra
- 24-bit
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:31 pm
Re: Animated unemployment map
Too many vampires.Ack wrote:What, you've never wanted to visit Barrow?Limewater wrote:I think people pretty much only go to northern Alaska when their jobs send them there.Hobie-wan wrote: Or maybe there were 2 without jobs and one moved to Northern Alaska, which if you notice, got better. I wonder what's going on up there.
Comics, RPG's, miniatures, and now retrogaming? I guess its time to learn to go without eating...
Re: Animated unemployment map
Here is a report when they changed the way they report unemployment in 1994. I don't think that's the first time they did it, but it's what I could find in a couple of minutes.dsheinem wrote:
hmmm...news to me - source?
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1995/10/art3full.pdf
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii