The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by Erik_Twice »

the7k wrote:I'm currently playing Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard
Found the intro:
Ey, that intro is very cool. I haven't played the game but at least the intro IS cool. :lol:
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
User avatar
the7k
Next-Gen
Posts: 4313
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:48 am

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by the7k »

General_Norris wrote:
the7k wrote:I'm currently playing Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard
Found the intro:
Ey, that intro is very cool. I haven't played the game but at least the intro IS cool. :lol:
Here's another of my favorite parts. Helps if you are a JRPG fan. Also, have to watch in HD to read.


For this video, it helps if you used to play Wolfenstein 3D back in the day.
User avatar
wip3outguy7
Next-Gen
Posts: 2805
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Austin

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by wip3outguy7 »

+1 for GitS: SAC on PS2. I have already praised this game endlessly to friends and even on racketboy. The multiplayer mode is one of the best on PS2. It isn't for everyone but it is definitely one of the best 3ps on the PS2, IMO.

+1 for Shinobi on the PS2. I think this game was doomed because of the changes that were going on in the video game industry. The game is old school, credit feeding tough when most games were moving toward the "beat the game and never die once" mentality. If you like Shinobi, give Nightshade a try. Nightshade is a bit more frustrating but still a damned good game.
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by GSZX1337 »

I thought that Games For Windows's review of Dark Messiah of Might and Magic was horseshit. IIRC, the score was 4.0. That game kicked ass, I'm not sure who at Ubisoft refused to give GFW a blow job.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
User avatar
J T
Next-Gen
Posts: 12417
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by J T »

I'm happy to report that I found a copy of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex for a mere $2.00 at a pawn shop. :D Thanks for the heads up about this game guys. I'm looking forward to playing it once I get some more free time where I can sit at the PS2 and play.
My contributions to the Racketboy site:
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
User avatar
Original_Name
Next-Gen
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by Original_Name »

I personally think that Sonic 3D Blast is a spectacular platformer, and maybe my favorite game set from an isometric perspective ever (or perhaps that title goes to Dark Savior? EDIT: Scratch that, that title definitely goes to Final Fantasy Tactics). It has challenging gameplay, spectacular music, and drop-dead gorgeous graphics. It's only downfall is that it was a Sonic game. The gameplay style wasn't quite right for a Sonic title because of the trickiness that an isometric point of view entails when compared to side-scrollers. If you ask me, the Sonic 3D Blast engine should have been used to make a ToeJam & Earl title or maybe a Beyond Oasis/LandStalker type title since those IP's would be more suited to slower puzzle-solving gameplay and further dependence on presentation. In fact, a ToeJam & Earl game based off the Sonic 3D Blast engine might be the best game that Sega never thought to make. Still, even today I find this game to be a great title, guilty of nothing other than a misuse of subject matter.

It has a GameRankings score of 66.25, but I'd rate it about an 8.2 for being a notably above-average game.
Last edited by Original_Name on Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

Original_Name wrote:I personally think that Sonic 3D Blast is a spectacular platformer, and maybe my favorite game set from an isometric perspective ever (or perhaps that title goes to Dark Savior?). It has challenging gameplay, spectacular music, and drop-dead gorgeous graphics. It's only downfall is that it was a Sonic game. The gameplay style wasn't quite right for a Sonic title because of the trickiness that an isometric point of view entails when compared to side-scrollers. If you ask me, the Sonic 3D Blast engine should have been used to make a ToeJam & Earl title or maybe a Beyond Oasis/LandStalker type title since those IP's would be more suited to slower puzzle-solving gameplay and further dependence on presentation. In fact, a ToeJam & Earl game based off the Sonic 3D Blast engine might be the best game that Sega never thought to make. Still, even today I find this game to be a great title, guilty of nothing other than a misuse of subject matter.

It has a GameRankings score of 66.25, but I'd rate it about an 8.2 for being a notably above-average game.
I agree with this. I also thought Sonic R was a ton of fun as well.
Older. Not wiser.
KholdStare
128-bit
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:55 am

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by KholdStare »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Original_Name wrote:I personally think that Sonic 3D Blast is a spectacular platformer, and maybe my favorite game set from an isometric perspective ever (or perhaps that title goes to Dark Savior?). It has challenging gameplay, spectacular music, and drop-dead gorgeous graphics. It's only downfall is that it was a Sonic game. The gameplay style wasn't quite right for a Sonic title because of the trickiness that an isometric point of view entails when compared to side-scrollers. If you ask me, the Sonic 3D Blast engine should have been used to make a ToeJam & Earl title or maybe a Beyond Oasis/LandStalker type title since those IP's would be more suited to slower puzzle-solving gameplay and further dependence on presentation. In fact, a ToeJam & Earl game based off the Sonic 3D Blast engine might be the best game that Sega never thought to make. Still, even today I find this game to be a great title, guilty of nothing other than a misuse of subject matter.

It has a GameRankings score of 66.25, but I'd rate it about an 8.2 for being a notably above-average game.
I agree with this. I also thought Sonic R was a ton of fun as well.
I can agree that Sonic 3D blast was decent, but to say that Sonic R was a "ton of fun" that's where I draw the line. You must have never played it, seriously. First someone says that Strider for the genesis and Zelda sucks, then someone else says that Sonic R "was a ton of fun".....I've lost all faith in this forum.
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

KholdStare wrote:
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Original_Name wrote:I personally think that Sonic 3D Blast is a spectacular platformer, and maybe my favorite game set from an isometric perspective ever (or perhaps that title goes to Dark Savior?). It has challenging gameplay, spectacular music, and drop-dead gorgeous graphics. It's only downfall is that it was a Sonic game. The gameplay style wasn't quite right for a Sonic title because of the trickiness that an isometric point of view entails when compared to side-scrollers. If you ask me, the Sonic 3D Blast engine should have been used to make a ToeJam & Earl title or maybe a Beyond Oasis/LandStalker type title since those IP's would be more suited to slower puzzle-solving gameplay and further dependence on presentation. In fact, a ToeJam & Earl game based off the Sonic 3D Blast engine might be the best game that Sega never thought to make. Still, even today I find this game to be a great title, guilty of nothing other than a misuse of subject matter.

It has a GameRankings score of 66.25, but I'd rate it about an 8.2 for being a notably above-average game.
I agree with this. I also thought Sonic R was a ton of fun as well.
I can agree that Sonic 3D blast was decent, but to say that Sonic R was a "ton of fun" that's where I draw the line. You must have never played it, seriously. First someone says that Strider for the genesis and Zelda sucks, then someone else says that Sonic R "was a ton of fun".....I've lost all faith in this forum.
Sure its not very replayable, but I had a good time the 30-45 minutes it took me to beat and unlock everything. :)
Older. Not wiser.
KholdStare
128-bit
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:55 am

Re: The critics were wrong- this game rocks

Post by KholdStare »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:Sure its not very replayable, but I had a good time the 30-45 minutes it took me to beat and unlock everything. :)
Sorry buddy, you have a typo. You mean't to say that "Sure it's not very PLAYABLE" :)
Post Reply