I'm not trying to be a smartass. You get defensive so quickly!Mozgus wrote:Everyone has heard about that theory. Don't try to be a smartass. Let's just agree that it didn't work, because I still only buy dry deodorants, and I hate Fast and Furious movies.dsheinem wrote:Actually, just because you haven't consciously noticed them doesn't mean they've been ineffective. Not all advertising (or persuasion in general) works through active cognition.Mozgus wrote: The fact that I didn't notice them for so long proves how ineffective the ads are...
There's a long-running discussion about this in academia...
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=sub ... tnG=Search
Just because you didn't notice the ads or haven't changed your purchasing habits doesn't mean that the advertising is ineffective, which is what you claimed in your first post. I just wanted to suggest a different point of view.
Besides, not all advertising is designed to necessarily get each and every viewer to buy the product advertised - sometimes they are simply trying to build brand recognition, create a favorable response to the ad/company, or get people talking about and posting their ads in other locations (like a forum!).
So the fact that you've come here and created a thread in which you both discussed and posted the actual advertising means that their ads have been successful - you have expanded the viewership for their ad and got people talking about them.
