mario games- the family tree.

Post by **nickfil** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:40 am

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v519/ ... inePic.jpg

pretty epic

Post by **ZeroAX** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:31 am

it's pretty sad that Luigi's Mansion has no line coming out of it, and the sports and party games take so much space

Post by **BIZ** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:02 am

dunno how I feel about the racing games. I guess its probably correct, but I have never played that F1 race game.

Post by **ZeroAX** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:39 am

BIZ wrote:dunno how I feel about the racing games. I guess its probably correct, but I have never played that F1 race game.

oh come on mario kart rocks. I know many people who don't like the mario games, but love the mario kart games

Post by **Hatta** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:18 am

Seems like they should have put the Mario Kart games in a descending branch. I mean, Mario Kart 64 is a descendent of Super Mario Kart, not a sibling. Also, New Super Mario Bros. should be a direct descendent of Super Mario World, and a sibling to Mario 64, which is the parent of the 3d Marios. But maybe I'm over thinking this.

You know, some of those sports games are actually quite good. It's Mario, so they're not going for realism and they distill the sport down to what makes it fun. I'm no sports fan myself, but it's worth remembering that they are games after all. I particularly like the Mario Golf and Mario Tennis series.

Post by **jfrost** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:55 am

I had never heard of the Mario Artist series. Looks really interesting.

Post by **Incognito D** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:14 am

Very cool, but I disagree with some of the layout. For example, I would say that Wario Land (i.e Super Mario Land 3) is a descendant of Super Mario Land 2, rather than of Mario & Wario.

I would have had Super Mario RPG alongside the paper Mario games because while they aren't directly related, it's pretty clear where the inspiration came from.

Post by **MrPopo** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:05 pm

Incognito D wrote:Very cool, but I disagree with some of the layout. For example, I would say that Wario Land (i.e Super Mario Land 3) is a descendant of Super Mario Land 2, rather than of Mario & Wario.

I would have had Super Mario RPG alongside the paper Mario games because while they aren't directly related, it's pretty clear where the inspiration came from.

To expand on that, I'd have the various Paper Mario and Mario & Luigi games descend from Mario RPG.

Post by **BIZ** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:43 pm

Hatta wrote:Seems like they should have put the Mario Kart games in a descending branch. I mean, Mario Kart 64 is a descendent of Super Mario Kart, not a sibling. Also, New Super Mario Bros. should be a direct descendent of Super Mario World, and a sibling to Mario 64, which is the parent of the 3d Marios. But maybe I'm over thinking this.

This is more of what I was getting at ZeroAX

I mean if super mario kart had just absolutely bombed when it was released, would there have been a mario kart 64? I guess there are several ways to look at it.

I also think there needs to be a more obvious/direct link between the Mario RPG and Paper Mario series.

Post by **randomnike** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:13 am

I visit the site which you have given and their i see the Mario games-the family tree. This picture is looking very awesome and amazing.
Mario games are very enjoyable games and people like to play games like this.

mario games- the family tree.

mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.

Re: mario games- the family tree.