Sega or Nintendo?
- SpaceBooger
- Moderator
- Posts: 4420
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: The AK-Rowdy
- Contact:
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
I don't have a boat...KholdStare wrote:Which one floats your boat?
I drive a jetski for my summer job and it floats just fine on water, I wouldn't want to ruin my Sega or Nintendo cartridges by putting a boat on top of them.
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
The Segendo dream. 
During the gamecube's darkest days, fanboys kept spreading rumors, that Sega and Nintendo would collaborate to beat sony and MS. Of course the rumors were bullshit, and I can't believe anyone actually believed them, but still at the time it sounded cool. And it would work wonders too. As long as nintendo took over the hardware business, and sega over the software business.
During the gamecube's darkest days, fanboys kept spreading rumors, that Sega and Nintendo would collaborate to beat sony and MS. Of course the rumors were bullshit, and I can't believe anyone actually believed them, but still at the time it sounded cool. And it would work wonders too. As long as nintendo took over the hardware business, and sega over the software business.
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
I grew up on nintendo but my heart currently lies with sega as Im rediscovering everything I missed out on earlier in life. Nintendo will always hold a special place though.
-
RyaNtheSlayA
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9201
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
- Location: Denver CO, USA
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
I prefer Nintendo. They have all of my favorite series (obviously I grew up with one) and got unbeatable support in the 16-bit era (Square). I also find it ironic that "Sega does what Nintendon't", because Nintendo had much better sound capabilities, and a slight graphical edge. Also there was Starfox, which I don't recall seeing a technical response to. Sega did have blast processing though.
-
RyaNtheSlayA
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9201
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
- Location: Denver CO, USA
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
Virtua Racing was the technical response to Star Fox.Dylan wrote:I prefer Nintendo. They have all of my favorite series (obviously I grew up with one) and got unbeatable support in the 16-bit era (Square). I also find it ironic that "Sega does what Nintendon't", because Nintendo had much better sound capabilities, and a slight graphical edge. Also there was Starfox, which I don't recall seeing a technical response to. Sega did have blast processing though.
Older. Not wiser.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
I like both too much to choose. *sits on fence*
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
Good point.RyaNtheSlayA wrote:Virtua Racing was the technical response to Star Fox.
-
HellHammer
- 64-bit
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:45 am
Re: Sega or Nintendo?
Seriously? I never even considered that...RyaNtheSlayA wrote:Virtua Racing was the technical response to Star Fox.Dylan wrote:Also there was Starfox, which I don't recall seeing a technical response to. Sega did have blast processing though.
Anyway, I've always purchased Sega's consoles, but Nintendo always gets the majority of my play time. Especially after SNES.
