Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by Ack »

Image

18. Litan

The town of Litan in France has a death festival. People wear masks, make music, dance, hold events. They also die. And then their spirits apparently come back as glowing aquatic worms that can possess a living body to take it over after a fit of catatonia. And when all this happens, everything in town just goes to shit.

Litan is a strange movie of the 1970s and -80s bizarre Euro horror variety. Expect synth scores, nightmarish imagery, and a plot that makes about zero sense, but if you were watching this for the plot, you're already missing the point. Because Litan is at best a dream: masked people screaming and shouting and committing violence or simply standing, staring at nothing. The hospital is a ruin full of bloody sheets and madmen, including the doctors. The cops dress like useless gestapo. And for some reason, the local geological survey wants to blow up a mountain range for some reason that's never explained.

This movie taught me to pay attention to my enigmatic dreams and that I can see dead people in the eyes of the living. It also told me that it's stupid to try and get revenge on a dead guy who once slept with my wife, and that French boy scouts are dumb enough to touch dynamite but don't know how to report a crime in progress. And also, French people do not care about car accidents.

What a strange film. Yet I liked it.


Image

19. Boar

This is an Australian movie about folks fighting a giant boar out in the rural outback. No, not that movie, you're thinking of Razorback, which is like this one only way more exploitative. Boar has less dirt, and the rural people are more likeable. And it also has Nathan Jones.

Who is Nathan Jones? A 6'11, 345 lbs mountain of man beef that could crush you like a tin can under a tank tread. I first saw him taking blows from the likes of Tony Jaa and Jet Li without flinching in mid-2000s martial arts movies, and in this movie he basically knife fights a festering, disease boar the size of a Mack truck, and it is the whole reason to watch. Though with a supporting case also featuring the likes of Bill Moseley and John Jarratt, you were gonna watch this movie anyways.

Ok, so the CG is bad when it's used, and there is some ridiculously stupid stuff, like a woman being able to speak after a bore tusk has literally split her mouth to double its length from the back, but the practical effects of the hideous pig? Awesome. And seeing a freaking juggernaut punch it in the face? Even more awesome.

It's not a great movie, but it gave me the dumb stuff I really wanted, and that's what counts.

19/31

1. Pulse
2. Boys from County Hell
3. The Strangers: Chapter 2
4. Glorious
5. Saloum
6. The Taking of Deborah Logan
7. Memoirs of a Murderer
8. Demons 2
9. The Poughkeepsie Tapes
10. Yummy
11. Mad God
12. The Autopsy of Jane Doe
13. Evil Dead Trap
14. Down
15. The Bay
16. One Cut of the Dead
17. Alligator II: The Mutation
18. Litan
19. Boar
Image
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
Posts: 12409
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by prfsnl_gmr »

Four more!

In Heretic (2024), Hugh Grant steals the show as a psychopath giving a TED talk on comparative religion to two young Mormon missionaries he’s trapped in his house. The movie is delightfully entertaining, wildly unpredictable, and just a terrifying delight from start to finish. Even if the script and setting weren’t so strong, it’d be watching just for Hugh Grant’s performance, which shifts on a dime from polite English gentleman to domineering, throat cutting murderer. I loved it, and it’s probably the best horror movie I’ve watched this year. Very highly recommended.

The characters in The Damned (2024) are a group of mid -19th century fisherman on the coast of Iceland grappling with guilt after leaving a group of shipwrecked sailors to drown. One of the drowned sailors may have come back as a draugr (i.e., a revenant from Viking folklore…They’re bad news.) The film is very moody, spooky, and oppressive, and it has a great setting, a great script, and a great monster. It’s also quite scary. We really liked it, and I think all of you would like it too. (It’s an 8/10 horror movie, with a 10/10 trailer. Check it out!)

Smile Before Death (1972) is a pretty bad giallo movie that I still kind of loved because it was so wacky. First, and despite multiple gruesome murders, it’s not scary at all. It’s about a pair of lovers trying to get away with a rich woman’s murder when her nubile daughter returns home from college and starts asking questions…but the plot’s really beside the point. The movie all about STYLE, which it has in spades. The fashion! The furniture! It’s all mid-century Italian awesomeness, and some of the sets are breathtaking in their audacity. They show one, but only one, of the female leads topless to the point it’s kind of ridiculous, and they play this one, peppy song over and over and even when the scene doesn’t call for peppy music. (It has scat dining in Italian and sounds like something from Katamari Damascus.). Despite how bad it is, I still kind of likes it, and I suspect my wife and I’ll be talking about it for a while.

Hellraiser (2022) is a reboot of the Hellraiser franchise and, probably, the third best Hellraiser movie. In it, a young woman recovering from addiction and living in poverty accepts an offer from her boyfriend to steal and split the proceeds from an abandoned storage unit. There’s only one thing in there, though…a puzzle box that summons the cenobites. If you’ve never seen a Hellraiser film before, this would be a good place to start. It’s well directed; it has a solid script; it looks great; it introduces the lore: and it’s gruesomely violent. If you’ve seen Hellraiser, though, you know what to expect, and nothing in it is particularly shocking. Moreover, many of the characters are very annoying, and the cenobites (particularly the very well-cast Pinhead) end up your favorite characters. Still, it was entertaining, and as a fan of the franchise, I enjoyed it.

PRFSNL_GMR’S SPOOKY HORROR MOVIES LIST: ORIGINS

The Beast Must Die - :(
The Wolf of Snow Hollow - :D
Wolf-Man - :)
In the Tall Grass - :(
Werewolf by Night - :|
Werewolf of London - :D
Horror in the High Desert - :D
The Cursed - :)
Presence - :|
The Blackening - :)
The Devil’s Rejects - :)
The Perfection - :|
The First Omen - :D
Viking Wolf - :)
Let’s Scare Jessica to Death - :D
Bloodthirsty - :(
In a Violent Nature - :)
The Lady in Black - :)
Identity - :(
Heretic - :D
The Damned - :)
Smile Before Death - :|
Hellraiser - :)
Last edited by prfsnl_gmr on Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:22 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by Michi »

Couple more movies!



Nightmare

Image

Janet returns home from her private school, six years after being away due to her mother murdering her father on Janet's birthday. During that time she's been plagued by horrible dreams involving her mother and the sanitarium, and as a result she spends many of her waking hours worried that her mother's illness is hereditary and that she will one day suffer the same fate. But even after she's sent home not only do her nightmares continue, but she also swears she sees a strange woman lurking in the corridors. Those closest to her assure her that it's just her nerves, but as her birthday approaches the dreams and visions get worse until she finally just snaps.

This is a psychological horror film produced by Hammer, and I think it's safe to say that it's one of the better ones. It looks lovely, build an excellent mood with it's old, dark English estate aesthetic, and has some some fine acting. It's also pretty short, so the plot moves at a good clip and it doesn't overstay it's welcome. The only downside is that it's actually pretty predictable. You'll be able to figure out what's going one pretty easily, even if you're not 100% sure of the how or why regarding their motivations. But it's still an effective, fun little film and an easy watch.




The Keeping Hours

Image

Following the death of his young son 10 years prior and the subsequent breakup of his marriage, Mark moves back into his old house that he had been renting out since then, intent to fix up the place and finally selling it. But after he arrives he starts hearing strange noises and noticing flashes of people running around. Initially he blames the happenings on the neighbor's kids. But he soon realizes that the spirit of his son Jacob is inhabiting the house. Mark is initially thrilled, but soon become apprehensive when Jacob starts asking about his mother, who Mark hasn't spoken to for some time.

Ah! The rare horror/romance sub-genre. You don't see those every day. Or at least not ones trying to shove sparkling vampires down your throat. And honestly I'm not sure this movie belongs in either category, since it's not at all scary (no, the little ghost boy is totally innocent and not out to get anyone) and there isn't any actual romance involved, except that seen in flashbacks. Instead this is more of a family drama about hope, acceptance and forgiveness. It just happens to involve a ghost. A very cute one that just wants to spend time with his parents and he wants them to be the happy people they used to be, and not the angry, bitter, alcoholics they've become. So if they they fight he makes his displeasure known by blowing up several light fixtures (so there is a fair bit of screaming), but that was a one-off and he doesn't do it again after his dad talks to him about it. Because he's a good boy and this isn't that type of movie. It's a movie about learning to move on in a healthy, constructive way, and it's very good, but also very sad and the kind of bittersweet that's meant to pull on your heartstrings. So even though the 'horror' isn't the primary focus, I'm listing it here because it's very charming and I think you should see it.




Afflicted

Image

Best buds Cliff and Derek decide that they're going to spend a whole year traveling around the world, and Cliff has brought enough equipment with him to document the whole thing. But they're only a few scant DAYS into their trip before Derek is accosted by a mysterious woman they met in a Paris nightclub that left him beaten and bloody in his bed. Despite his injuries he insists he's fine and refuses to go to the hospital, intent on continuing their tour. But by their next stop thing start to get progressively worse for Derek. It begins with Derek sleeping for hours, then he's not able to keep down any food, and soon he becomes very adverse to sunlight. But at the same time he's also gotten super strong and extremely fast. It isn't until Derek punches a guy out and licks his blood off his hand that Cliff can put a word to what's happening to his friend, but by the time the figure it out there isn't anything either of them can do to stop what's already begun.

After Area 51 I decided I wanted to find a better found footage horror film to watch this year, and I'm happy to say that I was successful. Because this one is actually pretty fun. If you can't tell, Derek is turning into a vampire and since it happens so fast (poor dude wasn't even a week into his trip before things went to shit) there's only a little bit of buildup before the plot really starts kicking in. So you don't have to put up with a copious amount of exposition or downtime. The acting and presentation are also great, because while it's a found footage film, it's mostly presented like an edited found footage film, not just the raw footage type, so it feels a lot more polished. My only real complaint is that the filmmakers seemed a bit picky/choose-y about what parts of the vampire folklore they were going to go with. So things like blood drinking and the effects of sunlight are kept, but I guess things like not showing up in mirrors and stakes through the heart killing them are kind of ignored. But other than that part bothering me, this is a very solid found footage outing.



Current movie count: 23
User avatar
PretentiousHipster
Next-Gen
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:10 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by PretentiousHipster »

Afflicted is quite well done, and Nightmare is one of my favourite horror films.

16a. Invitation to Hell (1982) - Michael J. Murphy 8/10

Micro budget filmmaking used to its full advantage. They know to calm down on the more practical stuff of filmmaking that is needed and aims for a more minimal, folk-horror style film that borders on being a psychological horror. With that you got just the few cast members to focus on who do a surprisingly good job, aside from the possessed drunk, and the environments of rural England is always nice to see. It's obvious that it's going to build up into something as the film goes on. Fortunately, that aspect was more than satisfying.

16b. Ataraxis (2025) - Joe Meredith 9/10

Honestly feels like a film showing what the rapture would be like in a more body horror sort of world, or perhaps the destruction of Earth by having it mirror the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah with the use of "burning" through rain.

Humanity slowly dies away, before reaching the next step of mankind. The people infected usually end up killing themselves as their last point of sanity, speaking of the prophecy being foretold of the angel of the highest order. The crucifixion of gore, and what may be one of the most effective final acts of the year. The beings of the bible took over the world, making them pay for their sins by utilizing the above methods to sort of cleanse it. It's a very clever use of allegory because if it is a case of them cleansing the Earth, having them turn into guts for the maggots to eat was an original way of showing it.

In the end, even ignoring all of that, the atmosphere is absolutely top notch in this. It knows to always stay creepy, but to never overwhelm you.

17. Neither the Sea Nor the Sand (1972) - Fred Burnley 7/10

Obsessively toxic relationships can still be convincing, at least on screen, to make for a compelling and surprisingly emotional film. The horror is only if you use semantics (feel free to remove this entry OP if you want it disqualified), so it was a bit disappointing in that regard; however, they manage to pull off the overall romance of it in a while that I can see this film being iconic to the romance addicts. It is one where both parties are obsessed to the point that I expected a stalking kind of horror film afterwards, but it accomplished showing the fact of how far they'll go for each other's love. It's a relationship dynamic I would never want to be involved in, but it makes an effective watching experience.

18. Talisman (1998) - David DeCoteau 7/10

It doesn't quite reach the level of Voodoo Academy in terms of the use of homoeroticism among a school environment, but it becomes fairly engaging through other uses which I won't spoil as they're twist-based. This has a more effective atmosphere than usual for DeCoteau, and I also appreciated how one of the shots just had the shadows of 2 characters.

Of course, homoeroticism is still here. Exercising while in their white underwear, and what might be my favourite line: Oh, you like to play dirty? I can play dirty too. In ways you wouldn't expect.

19. Six She's and a He (1963) - Richard S. Flink 9/10

Absolute insanity that I am convinced was a regressive response to the sexual revolution of the time. It's a nudie cutie without the nudity, and this time the women torture men, rape them, and force them to do their work. It was a time in history where women were becoming more independent and the nuclear family was slowly falling apart, so, like what follows the classic exploitation formula under the Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!: A History of Exploitation Films, 1919-1959 book by Eric Schaefer, treats independent women as "the other" to make the male audience terrified of them. The message of this was basically "women are scary".

It makes for a fascinating historical document because of this. But, on top of the aspects mentioned above, this is actually a splatter film as well. The writer was the lead actor in Blood Feast, and I can't find another film that came out between this and Blood Feast that falls under that movement.

Just making something that's the anti-nudie cutie with Herschell Gordon Lewis style gore was surreal enough to see. The fact that this is most definitely a fearmongering film for men who want women "back in the kitchen" as the nuclear family makes this for a historically fascinating film to watch as well.

20. Rise of the Animals (2012) - Chris Wojcik 2/10

A film that succeeds in regards to a few comedic chops, mostly thanks to the CGI and puppetry of the evil animals. However, this falls too much into forced meme territory that is quite painful to watch, especially with the style of early 2010s humour among the people of the age in the film. The dramatic aspect failed for the most part as well, as it didn't end getting past the filler stage, and remained unconvincing.

21. Beyond the Darkness (1979) - Joe D’Amato 8/10

Almost felt like Cronenberg's Crash in regards of the disturbing nature of desires. The lead is obviously considered as the disturbing one to most viewers, as he taxidermies his partner and uses her for his indirect sexual fantasies. However, his housekeeper is one that isn't far behind which should be more talked about. She has the "mommy" kink in what may be the most disturbing depiction that I have seen in a film. It seems to be the case where she wants that dynamic to remain, but sees the body as the initial necessary evil. A dead body won't last for long, and helping him with it means that he will still trust her. There is a lot of in-depth psychological aspects to a film like this, and a lot more to it than just the reputation of its gore.

22. The Evictors (1979) - Charles B. Pierce 3/10

I obviously won't spoil the twists, but it's what makes the film completely fall apart. It was one that didn't really make for engaging stakes for the film. Like a film of this type, a threat must first be established for the protagonist, adding a sense of mystery for the viewer, as the horror lies in the unknown. THEN the answers, or the backstory, should slowly be given.

The approach this film went for was ineffective because it went for the backstory first, and then depended on risks for risk sake, which almost never bodes well. You need to do more than a lazy writing method of just making someone's jaw drop at the absurdity of a twist.

23. Heartbeat (1983) - Paul Naschy 4/10

I haven't been so torn about a film in a long time. This has a great style to it. The minimal music rules, and the more atmosphere-based scenes are just fantastic. It gives off a nice plot that is reminiscent of those realistic drama-based horrors that slowly drift into pure horror.

The thing is, do you know that Netflix article saying that they plan to explain every single thing they are going to do for the background viewers? This film was all that. They explained all of their actions, future plans, and why they are doing. It truly was some awful writing. Even the drama based stuff wasn't the best, of basically everyone having an affair with everyone to just keep the chain going.

In the end, I guess I'd call this a bad film, but it was an entertaining watch.

24. Curtains (1983) - Richard Ciupka 4/10

Decent enough in regards to how far one would go for a while, and the systemic approach of Hollywood as to how the directors/producers would take advantage of that. The overall slasher-based atmosphere is well done as well. There is quite a bit of side plots here, and although the atmosphere the nice, the slashing aspect itself wasn't the best. I didn't like how twist-based this was either, and that overall made it a frustrating film.

25. Cyclops (1987) - George Iida 6/10

A mad scientist film with a decent and creepy build up in the beginning where the apex of it is just fantastic. This is slightly ruined by its attempts at comedy in the beginning which did slightly ruin whatever atmosphere it was going for, but it didn't completely detract from the experience. The gore in this film is enough of a reason to watch this. Highly imaginative.

26. Ingagi (1930) - William Campbell 2/10

Amusing as a historical document, yet it's absolutely awful as a film. It goes for the usual pre-mondo formula that was big in classic exploitation, including making almost everything up to make another race seem scary to the white audience. However, the amusing stuff is how they deal with the way monkeys really are (the so called gorillas were orangutans and chimpanzees), and the fact that most of the footage is literally stolen from a film from 1915. However, even if I watched the 1915 version of this I would still find it incredibly underwhelming. It barely surpasses the level of Lumiere-style filmmaking.

27. Silent Night Deadly Night 4: Initiation (1990) - Brian Yuzna 9/10

Part 3 aimed for a surrealistic touch that was quite ethereal and entertaining. This however, is leagues ahead. It looks like the Christmas angle was even forced into this (at least the Solstice was involved). This aimed for just pure horror at its most disturbing. The use of bugs is absolutely top notch that had me constantly squirming, and the body horror was even more effective. It succeeded in having an intense atmosphere and mood on top of it. I appreciated the more grey area as well with the cult. All in all, this is one of the few horrors that actually freak me out, and for that I highly recommend it.

28. Roadgames (1981) - Richard Franklin 6/10

Its goal was to aim for a minimalistic slasher with an almost pleasant mood to it at the same time. Both the lead and his pet are entertaining characters that give an earlier blockbuster vibe, and somehow fit in well with the b-movie type. However, it did make this reach a bit too much into that "inoffensive" territory that films with these sorts of characters get into, making this partially underwhelming.
User avatar
REPO Man
Next-Gen
Posts: 5093
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Outer Banks, NC

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by REPO Man »

David DeCocteau's films are pretty much just PG-13 gay porn with semi-hard-R levels of gore.

Yesterday, while doing laundry, I fired up the AMC+ app and streamed Pet Semetary 2. Halloween '99 was my first Halloween where I was too old to trick-or-treat, so I just watched bits and pieces of horror movies before watching Wes Craven's New Nightmare on a local(ish) WB affiliate.

Despite airing what used to be called The Sci-Fi Channel, it was amazing how much violence they were able to get away with. One such horror movie I watched (bits and pieces of) was Pet Semetary 2. Keep in mind that I wasn't much into horror movies at that time, so naturally I haven't seen the first one at the time.

I think the last time I watched this was the first October after moving into my own place, so eight years ago. Jesus, has it already been that long?
User avatar
PretentiousHipster
Next-Gen
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:10 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by PretentiousHipster »

I've seen 84 DeCoteau films lol. Calling them gay porn does a partial disservice because of how eclectic his films are, but almost all are baffling.
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by Michi »

Of what I've seen of DeCoteau, I certainly wouldn't call his films "porn" in any way. But the homoeroticism is definitely undeniable. There's just too many young dudes walking around in their tighty-whities (or in some cases nothing at all) to ignore that particular intent :lol:
User avatar
PretentiousHipster
Next-Gen
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:10 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by PretentiousHipster »

Michi wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:53 pm Of what I've seen of DeCoteau, I certainly wouldn't call his films "porn" in any way. But the homoeroticism is definitely undeniable. There's just too many young dudes walking around in their tighty-whities (or in some cases nothing at all) to ignore that particular intent :lol:
He did start out his career doing gay pornography. There are a few straight softcores which are hilarious to watch. From I'd say the late 90s to the mid 2000s he had his dtv horror period. Then there was that white underwear and kids movies period.

It's a shame that no one follows his lifetime or Christmas films. They are just as insane.
User avatar
REPO Man
Next-Gen
Posts: 5093
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Outer Banks, NC

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by REPO Man »

Michi wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:53 pm Of what I've seen of DeCoteau, I certainly wouldn't call his films "porn" in any way. But the homoeroticism is definitely undeniable. There's just too many young dudes walking around in their tighty-whities (or in some cases nothing at all) to ignore that particular intent :lol:
It's hard NOT to find a single DeCocteau film where there's at least five frames where one could slap a gay porn studio logo in the corner and folks who don't know better would think it's legit.

Not that my gay and thirsty ass is complaining.

But aside from that, if anyone is interested in homebrew horror games for GameBoy... here you go. Unless you're into homebrew horror games for the NES. Or homebrew games in general.

But then again, maybe you just want some mind-rotting low-poly horror games of varying quality.
PretentiousHipster wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:52 pm He did start out his career doing gay pornography.
He did?!
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Racketboy Month of Horror 16: Weaponization

Post by Michi »

Movies, movies, watchin' more movies...


Happy Birthday to Me <------ Link to more detailed thoughts

Image

A young woman returns back home and back to school, after recovering from a horrific accident that caused her serious brain damage. But once she's back in school, several of her friends start to disappear one by one. What's worse is that she keeps having dreams that she's the one killing them, but because no one can find them she starts to think she's going crazy...

I've put off watching this movie for years because I thought that shish-kabob boy on the poster looked kind of silly. But it turns out that this was actually a very solid little slasher. Although, maybe I shouldn't call it little, since it's over 2 hours long and trying desperately to be a giallo, just without all the pretty colors and snazzy furniture. The deaths are varied, but sometimes silly, and the film looks absolutely lovely. The downsides are that some of the characters, most of which are supposed to belong to the "really smart kids" crowd, are actually hella dumb most of the time, and that the twist at the end (both of them!) is so silly that it'll make you want to roll your eyes. But I think this is still a good one, even with the oddities.



Virus

Image

After they loose their cargo while traveling through a hurricane, a tugboat captain and his crew come across an abandoned Russian ship floating adrift in the eye of the storm. Thrilled to find something that could be salvaged and easily make up for their lost cargo, the captain fully intends to bring the ship in hoping for a rich reward. But the more they explore the ship the more the crew realizes that the Russians may have found something that they shouldn't have and that there was a very good reason for them to abandon that boat.

Goodness, what a great cast to use on such a mediocre movie. Don't get me wrong, I actually liked quite a bit of it, but mostly because of how cheesy large swaths of it were. The premise and effects though? Those were pretty great. See, the Russians accidentally picked up some form of alien AI, and after examining all the data about Earth the AI determined that humanity is a virus upon the planet (which....yeah) and that we're only good for spare parts. So it kills everyone it can and merges them with the machines, turning them into very creepy cyborgs. Neat. And they used mostly practical effects with minimal CGI, so it all looks pretty good. And of course the acting is well above grade, cause you've got Donald Sutherland and Jamie Lee Curtis heading up the ranks. Unfortunately though, the plot is pretty predictable. I don't know how to describe it, but the movie came out in 1999 and it 100% feels like it. Does that make sense? I just feel like there's a certain vibe around films from that particular era that makes them so easy to figure out. Like you can see the plot points coming before they even set them up. Captain goes crazy, another guy goes crazy, the one chick is the only sane one in the bunch, pointless self sacrifice, things go BOOM! Yeah, that kind of movie. Overall a fun little popcorn flick, but not much more than that.




Wer

Image

While in France, a American defense attorney Kate Moore and her team are asked to defend a murder suspect, who is charged with with brutally killing a visiting tourist family. The attacks were so vicious that the victims were torn to shreds. Convinced that her client is being set up due to his haggard appearance and a growing conspiracy she's discovered that suggests the police and other officials are trying to take her client's land, More and her team set out to prove that the crime was the work of an animal and not a man. But when they take their client to a clinic to get him tested for porphyria, Moore discovers that both her and the police may have both been right in their assumptions about the crime.

I rather liked this one. They decided to forgo much of the whole "transformation" aspect of the werewolf, so instead of turning into an actual dog or some kind of two legged variant, our wolf friend just gets a lot hairier... and mean. Which I actually think is pretty effective, because then instead of a wolf you're dealing with a very violent human, one that can't be reasoned with and is working on pure animal-like instinct. Except he still has the smarts of a human, and all the super strength and nigh-unkillability that you'd expect from a monster. It's actually very effective and very chilling. Especially when this dude does things like leaps from an 8 story building, lands on all fours, and then slowly stands up and glowers at you through that mass of scraggy hair.

The only small ding against it is that I think that the story could have used a little more polish, particularly when it came to the police. The movie was simply trying WAY too hard to convince us that all of the police looked at those wounds and were 100% convinced that a man did it, when even most laymen would have looked at them and thought an animal was to blame. Even after they shoot a fucking bear (a BEAR!) that they were completely surprised to see and they admit shouldn't have been in the area, they're still pushing the human theory. I mean, WE know they're right, but that's not the point. I'm just saying they were being a little too obvious with their ulterior motives, is all. One should really be more subtle in their evil conspiracies, after all.




Revenge of the Pontianak

Image

In 1960 Malaysia, Khalid and Siti are getting married in Khalid's small home town. Everyone is invited and seems to be having a good time. Except for one very specific person who Khalid and his friends thought was gone and out of their lives forever. But now that person is back and intent on getting the revenge they so justly feel they deserve. Leaving Khalid and his friends to finally face the consequences of sins they thought they'd long since buried and forgotten for 10 long years.

This one is a Singaporean-Malaysian revenge horror that has been sitting on my watch-list for quite a while now. And honestly, though I feel like it's pretty average, I still rather liked it. The pacing is pretty slow, most of the characters were kind of dull and I don't think there was really enough plot here to justify the 92 minute runtime. But I also thought the setting, imagery and camerawork were quite lovely, as was the coloring when the film thought to use it. Some descriptors call the Pontianak a 'vampire', and while that may be an accurate description of the monster in some Malaysia folklore, that's not really going on here. So you shouldn't expect to see this chick going around biting people and draining their blood. This is just a ghost who's supremely pissed off and out to get the people who hurt her and anyone else who gets in her way. But she's also not without mercy, so she doesn't kill the poor wedding singer who happened to witness the first death, even though she easily could have. So the movie's not that scary and not as dickish as it would have been with a Japanese ghost (I'll never let that go).

But it's got a good sense of style, and I did enjoy the bloody ending where she was just sucking people into the forest left and right because "fuck you idiots, get out of my way." Gal was on a mission and was not at all perturbed by your angry mob, Khalid. Ya gotta respect her for being so focused. But you also really needed a much better plan. Then again, that douchebag royally sucked at planning to begin with, which is what got him into the whole mess in the first place. So at no point should you feel any sympathy for that idiot anyway. Seriously, that guy sucks. Best to just root for the "vampire" in this one.




Assuming my counting is right, my movie total for the month so far is now: 27
Post Reply