I really don't think so...marurun wrote:You're much more forgiving assigning "classic" status to your own picks. I stand by my assessment. Re-submit!
The vast majority of the games that I said "nah" too are games that typically did not sell well, are not well-known, or are just demonstrably poor quality games. Some are all of these things. Almost all of them have much better (and better known) expressions of the same/similar ideas within their genre, on their platform, and/or from their era.
That said, I am willing to entertain reasonable arguments about why games should come off the wall of shame. Those arguments should include sales figures, well-resepected "best of" rankings, demonstrable influence of the game, etc. I provided those for my picks and stand by them. I can be sympathetic to others who believe they can do the same for the wall of shame games.
