Even if the Security Levels headers were stripped, the content certainly would indicate the sensitivity. No proof since all the Email locked to a private server were deleted and cannot be used as evidence.marurun wrote:Further, her staff are the ones who sent and forwarded to her emails that contained confidential information, and they stripped the Classified information headers when they did it, so the emails she received didn't have that key information indicating clearly whether the emails had classified information contained within.
1. Clinton read the EMails, did not have enough concern or did not want anyone to know. Public Officials still have to answer for their acts and represent the people so why is the Email deletion not against the law?
2. Clinton did not bother to read the Emails due to overwhelming load of in box. We have all been there auto deleting Spam without reading. However, this is the U.S Secretary of State inbox, ALL Email should have been carefully scrutinized and none deleted! Certainly not sent on a private server preventing appropriate security clearance personnel to verify. How is that even allowed!?
The deletion of government documents which should include all Email between public office representatives if not against the law damn well should be!
The statement "I did not know the security level" and "I forgot" are absolute pitiful excuses especially for the United States Secretary of State! Elken's statement below applies to anyone taking public office.
ElkinFencer10 wrote:<Concerning Voters> I would argue that informing yourself is part of your duty.
)