PresidentLeever wrote:I'd say it's more questionable to not pay the original game devs (when possible) for the money made on this or VC games
Most of these games were Nintendo developed and published to begin with. Nintendo is still making money off of them if someone buys this device or through the VC.
Also in general when you buy a game, you are paying the publisher, not the developer. The publisher paid the developer already to develop the game. If there are royalties in place the developer may continue to make money off sales of the game, but that's not as common. And royalties such as that for these games would have expired long ago.
PresidentLeever wrote:to not provide an alternative to all the clearly overpriced old games that are in demand and not included with this console (personally I would only want to play ~20 of the 30 games too) is also bad business sense.
If this device sells well, that could encourage Nintendo to develop other variations of the NES Classic that include different libraries. It would be bad business sense to include every possible popular Nintendo owned NES game on their first classic console. That limits future profits.
The best thing you can do if you want this device but with other libraries, is to buy this first iteration to encourage further releases with the games you're hoping for. I'm pretty sure we all want SNES Classic / N64 Classic, but we've got to prove the market is viable to Nintendo first.
PresidentLeever wrote:I'm just weighing this against a PC connected to a good screen, with a USB NES pad or similar. NES emulation is great nowadays
Sure. I love emulation and IMO NES emulation has been great since
NESticle. But you have to understand most gamers don't want to mess with emulation for whatever personal reasons.