Exhuminator wrote:BoringSupreez wrote:And MGS2 is the crowning achievement.
I think MGS2 is an ass basket, but I get why some folks love it. It's incredibly subversive and daring, and took some ballsy chances. But behind all its insanity, the actual gameplay doesn't measure up to its predecessor and I found the plot itself to be amateur hour. Truly MGS2 is the most divisive of the series.
Stripping away the story, and focusing purely on the gameplay, I find MGS2 to be a safe but natural evolution of MGS1's gameplay. Basically all the same stuff, with first-person shooting and analog movement added in. It's sort of like comparing Medal of Honor on PS1 to Medal of Honor Frontline on PS2.
The story, yeah, if you don't love it you'll probably think it's the most retarded thing ever. I remember MGS2 being one of those popular-to-hate games in the few years after release, sort of like Halo 2.
Exhuminator wrote:Everything I've heard about MGS5 makes it sound like something I'd love, so I'm nabbing a copy of it very soon. I've still got to play MGS4 and Ground Zeroes first though. I'm very leery of MGS4 because it looks like it has a lot more in common with MGS2 than MGS3.
MGS4 is like a weird hybrid between 2 and 3. It has crouchwalking, auto-camo, and it's mostly viable to run through the game shooting everybody like MGS3. At the same time, it's cramped and restricted like MGS2, and it's got an equally bonkers but much less clever story. I can't say I've met anyone who names MGS4 as their favorite MGS game, but it's still a must-play. Think of it as being the Attack of the Clones of the MGS series.
TBH you could play MGSV without playing MGS4 and still understand the story. It's Peace Walker and Ground Zeroes that you really need under your belt first. Ground Zeroes is really cheap and just 3-ish hours long if you only play the main story mission so don't hesitate.