Illumiroom

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Illumiroom

Post by Luke »

dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Illumiroom

Post by dsheinem »

I'd heard about this for a while but seeing that video was really something. Very, very cool. Since this is being developed by MS and will likely be an exclusive type of hardware, my interest in the next Xbox is now much much higher than it was before.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Illumiroom

Post by Luke »

A friend of mine just emailed me with this:

"MS already clarified this is not ready for the next xbox. Too bad but I'm sure it will be a periphery available for purchase."

Not sure if he is correct or not.
Retrodude
128-bit
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:30 pm
Location: The Middle Of Nowhere

Re: Illumiroom

Post by Retrodude »

Meh. It seems more like an expensive gimmick than a real step forward. TV Tropes has a name for this: Revenue Enhancing Devices

I seriously hope people won't be fooled, but I know such thinking is pointless cause it'll sell a ton of units regardless of whether the final product is good or bad. And if it's bad, you'll see people defending it no matter what to try and justify the amount of money they spent on it.

At least the Wii U's gimmick makes sense (using the gamepad as an options and/or map screen so you don't have to pause the game or go into a submenu). This just seems like MS is trying too hard.
I'm not a glitch, I just have pixlexia.
Raiiban wrote:That's a moral dilemma. Capitalism has no morals.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Illumiroom

Post by dsheinem »

Retrodude wrote:Meh. It seems more like an expensive gimmick than a real step forward. TV Tropes has a name for this: Revenue Enhancing Devices

I seriously hope people won't be fooled, but I know such thinking is pointless cause it'll sell a ton of units regardless of whether the final product is good or bad. And if it's bad, you'll see people defending it no matter what to try and justify the amount of money they spent on it.

At least the Wii U's gimmick makes sense (using the gamepad as an options and/or map screen so you don't have to pause the game or go into a submenu). This just seems like MS is trying too hard.
take this fanboy horse shit elsewhere. not all new tech is a "gimmick" that people will buy based on branding. if you don't see the appeal, fine...but it isn't an inherently bad idea or somehow "trying too hard". Let's at least wait to see how this is actually utilized by game devs before passing judgemnet, shall we? We can criticize the Kinect, Move, or Wii U screen based on its actual usage at this point. By contrast, we don't know how/if this device might pan out, nor do we know if it will be a high-margin "revenue enhancing device". So just stop.
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Illumiroom

Post by Erik_Twice »

It's a very smart concept. As someone who has a triplehead setup I can tell you, having peripherial vision makes games much more inmmersive. But, of course, triplehead setups requires several screens, which is expensive. What they are tring to do is to offer a cheaper, less powerful alternative which is a great goal.

Now there are two problems with this: One is that projectors are very expensive and the second one is that the effects can't be too amazing because the games are made to the limits of the hardware, not a fourth of it.
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Illumiroom

Post by isiolia »

General_Norris wrote: Now there are two problems with this: One is that projectors are very expensive and the second one is that the effects can't be too amazing because the games are made to the limits of the hardware, not a fourth of it.
The two of those factors taken together could provide a way that the system could actually be feasible.

A relatively low resolution projector that can get away with a lower brightness level could possibly work. In turn, the level of processing needed for the picture data would be lower - or could be offloaded to a cheap SOC.

Main cost concern would likely be bulbs, though LED lightbulbs have gotten better, maybe that would be sufficient.

This + Kinect makes me wonder if a consumer/commodity CAVE might be possible with it.
User avatar
CRTGAMER
Next-Gen
Posts: 11933
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Illumiroom

Post by CRTGAMER »

An interesting concept. I wonder if lighting up the furniture around the HDTV might distract from soaking into a game? I keep my room dark when gaming or watching a movie for this reason. However, it looks likes at times the Illumiroom works. The extended lighting such as the Starfield example, where the furniture does not show looks great!

Would this image be better just using a full wall screen?

Image
Image
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425

Image
Image
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Illumiroom

Post by irixith »

Whoa. I thought the extended FOV was neat, but I was completely captured by it with the lighting mimicking what was going on in the game, followed by items falling out of the TV.

That's pretty fucking awesome stuff right there.
User avatar
Nemoide
Next-Gen
Posts: 2395
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:37 pm
Location: New York state
Contact:

Re: Illumiroom

Post by Nemoide »

This definitely looks like it could be really cool.

...but I'm not sure if I'll ever have enough space to properly have it set up! D:
Image
Post Reply