Brony discussion split

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
jp1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by jp1 »

pepharytheworm wrote:
dsheinem wrote:
AppleQueso wrote: frankly I don't think a lot of people in those communities felt particularly welcome around here.

...probably because people keep associating them with pedophiles.
I don't see anyone doing that in this thread.
Maybe not in this thread particularly but we have had other Brony topics pop up. Either way whether or not people said anything about pedophilia doesn't matter as I have read enough negative comments about them in this thread and on this forum that her point still stands.
Really? In this thread? I think it has been an overall supportive vibe in this particular instance. You will always have exceptions, and I don't know about the board in general, however I think you may be reading too much into at least a few of these posts.
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by irixith »

Brony = paedophile, bestiality, potentially autistic
Gamer = fat, bearded, lives in basement, socially awkward
Woman = all women on the internet are men

........now we're all on the same page?
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by Pulsar_t »

Ya nobody has mentioned paedos here; furries on the other hand...
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
AppleQueso

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by AppleQueso »

irixith wrote: Woman = all women on the internet are men
REALLY trying to not read too much into this one
User avatar
jp1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by jp1 »

Why such a negative response to inquiries about autism? It seems counter intuitive to defend one thing for people's right to choose while at the same time condemning something they cannot. Autism does not equal stupid, and it has a very large spectrum of people, some of whom are highly intelligent and function quite well.

I don't follow with the sarcasm irixith, are you referring to my post?
AppleQueso wrote:
irixith wrote: Woman = all women on the internet are men
REALLY trying to not read too much into this one
Quite sure that those were some common generalizations, not pointed accusations. Following irixith's opinions on this thread leads to an obvious conclusion there isn't anything to read into there.
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by pepharytheworm »

jp1 wrote:
pepharytheworm wrote:
dsheinem wrote:
I don't see anyone doing that in this thread.
Maybe not in this thread particularly but we have had other Brony topics pop up. Either way whether or not people said anything about pedophilia doesn't matter as I have read enough negative comments about them in this thread and on this forum that her point still stands.
Really? In this thread? I think it has been an overall supportive vibe in this particular instance. You will always have exceptions, and I don't know about the board in general, however I think you may be reading too much into at least a few of these posts.
Did I say the overall vibe or did I say enough negative comments? Did I just mention this thread or did I say in this thread and on this forum? You yourself were defending against remarks you deemed negative. If I was a Brony I would not let it be known in this thread.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by pepharytheworm »

jp1 wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
irixith wrote: Woman = all women on the internet are men
REALLY trying to not read too much into this one
Quite sure that those were some common generalizations, not pointed accusations. Following irixith's opinions on this thread leads to an obvious conclusion there isn't anything to read into there.
Read AppleQueso's signature and maybe it will become more clear.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by irixith »

AppleQueso wrote:
irixith wrote: Woman = all women on the internet are men
REALLY trying to not read too much into this one
The first rule of being T is to realize that being offended is a choice. You might indeed be a special snowflake...perhaps even the most special of special snowflakes. The thing is, the rest of the world doesn't give much of a hoot, and sure doesn't enjoy having their language and/or jokes policed by a bunch of folks that have forgotten the lighter side of life because they're too caught up in what special snowflakes they are. It's a big ol' nasty mean world out there, and the sooner you get right with yourself and build up your resilience to the things that don't really matter, the happier you'll be both on and off the internet.

/not dancing around the issue
/intending nothing untoward
/always look on the bright side of life

I'm with you, gender hurts a lot of people...but your sense of self/identity should never be an internet comment away from crumbling around your ears. :)
User avatar
jp1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by jp1 »

pepharytheworm wrote:
Read AppleQueso's signature and maybe it will become more clear.
I'm perfectly clear on it. It obviously wasn't meant to be serious or offensive, check the rest of irixith's posts, and the context of the post. However, apologies if it seemed dismissive AQ, I can assure you it was not.

Of course I was defending their rights. I'm not sure what you're driving at, there have been more positive and supportive comments than negative ones. Expecting that nobody will have a difference of opinion is unreasonable. A majority (including myself) have been pushing to make all members comfortable regardless of gender issues or "Brony" status. To ignore that fact and put it out there as if this is an intolerant community is a bit short sighted and quite frankly dismissive of the efforts of people who have no skin in the game other than being supportive. I'm not sure where the communication barrier is here, but we share the same view on the topic at hand, it seems pointless to bicker over semantics.
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Brony discussion split

Post by pepharytheworm »

jp1 wrote:
pepharytheworm wrote:
Read AppleQueso's signature and maybe it will become more clear.
I'm perfectly clear on it. It obviously wasn't meant to be serious or offensive, check the rest of irixith's posts, and the context of the post. However, apologies if it seemed dismissive AQ, I can assure you it was not.
I am not one to speak for others but to me it was quite clear that AppleQueso wasn't thinking irixith was trying to be offensive or serious.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
Post Reply